Комментарии:
I need about 100,000 of these.........with 1 million rounds of ammo each.
ОтветитьI've had a sightMark for years and seems to work well
ОтветитьI think a 357 Magnum round would be better. Just my opinion, because of more power.
ОтветитьGreetings once again from Kentucky and New Hampshire's Lake Region...if I can stop drooling for a moment, all I can say is: be still my beating heart! Keep fighting the good fight.
ОтветитьI've been waiting what seems like forever to see this thing! Thanks Jeff👍🏻
ОтветитьUrban legend ? Nope, Sightmark gets a lot of its well deserved, NEGATIVE reputation from previous owners that swear not to waste their money on any more Sightmarks. As I still have a few Sightmarks, sitting in junk jars, I keep them as a reminder of how poor the sights really are, and the lessons that Sightmark has taught me. #1 - buy a better sight. #2 - look at the specs for which battery the sight uses and how many #3- look at how long the sight is supposed to work on a single battery; but take manufacturer's specs with a grain of salt. #4 distrust of electronic on/off buttons/ more trust for a mechanical switch.
The Sightmarks I bought used 3 tiny watch batteries, was supposed to auto-off, and i ended up replacing the batteries every time I used the sights, even if I put fresh batteries in it yesterday, by today, the batteries would be dead. So, no, it's not urban legend; it's a reputation that Sightmark gets from releasing junk! Maybe a few product lines might be OK- but the ones I bought -- were JUNK.
Is Sightmark the only company on my do not buy list ? Heck now. Sharp electronics are crap generally. Toshiba. LG. Maxtor. Any number of products- that either failed early, or I tried a few and all exhibited the same early failures or were too expensive to keep throwing money at, or you could not trust to work reliably.. Nope, buy something else, maybe pay a little bit more, and hope that the quality is better.
I like it. Thank you and have a good weekend.
Ответитьwhat year was that made? is it a T & E gun or a federal stamped gun?
ОтветитьVery cool, thanks for the parts description. Lots of fun with that I am sure!
ОтветитьThumbs up Jeff, awesomeness.
ОтветитьHave 2 sightmark wolverines. they have been holding up fine. An improvement would be a circle dot in the $170 range. would give primary arms and holosun completion. you might want to mention it to them.
Ответитьare you going to the green mountain boys shoot in july
ОтветитьThat is one HELL of a door gun! YUT!
ОтветитьI need two of those mounted to the front of my truck badass thanks for the review and all of your great videos and cheers
Ответитьawesome 9mm I like and I did a post on my sight mark on my M-4 Jeff,I love this sight and I have had zero problems with it.
Ответитьwell I got 2 of the parts right lol nice weapon wouldn't mind haven one lol
ОтветитьYou mean the Frankenstein Gun? It's Alive... I Barrel part I figured out but the rest of the build was not familiar to me. Great video man.
ОтветитьCenter receiver? Is that a thing?
ОтветитьSo is the FAL section modified as an open bolt system?
Im sure someone could make a semi auto version of this fairly easily, using semi auto MAC parts and an FAL lower.
16" barrel and all. No stamp or SOT license needed
I love that thing!
ОтветитьI would probably agree with the myths out there on SightMark stuff or as excuses to their shitty shooting. I really appreciate you putting them through the paces...
ОтветитьWell I guessed a part or two correctly 👍
Great stuff, thanks for sharing. Please keep up the great work.
How hard would it be to build something with that rate of fire, but is chambered for 12 gauge rounds? 😀
ОтветитьNot POS $5 sightmark sights.
Ответить3 questions...
1. Where is Ted Nugent in this video
2. How can I get one of these?
3. How many zombies per minute do you think you could kill with it?
seems very reminiscent of a MPA 971, but converted to full auto with spade grips and barrel shroud.
ОтветитьNice looking gun ya got there. I want to see the bolt/recoil spring mechanism or is that top secret????
ОтветитьI'm sure Len Savage would love this.
ОтветитьGuessing you took the FAL lower and put in a Mac SMG FCG to run it as a open bolt?
ОтветитьIll take 20!!!
ОтветитьYou must have built this before 1986????'
ОтветитьDo you have to pay a 200 dollar tax stamping each gun u make with the manufacturer license after u get the license
ОтветитьThat's awesome man! How do you get around the whole "no manufacturing full auto after 1986" garbage?
ОтветитьSightmark is complete trash. It’s not a myth. I had the ultrashot plus and the windage/elevation screws didn’t do anything. I tried to contact sightmark 4 times via phone and email over a span of 4 weeks and never got a response. to this day i have never heard back from them. And yes i checked the spam folder.
ОтветитьAwesome build!
ОтветитьBadass gun!
ОтветитьSightmark P.O.S.
I beg anyone thinking of buying this Sightmark sight to save their money. 100% junk
Awesome gun though
ОтветитьI have multiple sightmark sights of different levels. Zero issues. Love them for the affordability and for the durability I have been getting out of mine.
ОтветитьLooks to be a highly modified Uzi
ОтветитьMounted a Sightmark on my Remington 870 and it didn't even make it through the first tube before it physically broke. Haven't tried them since, but thanks for testing them for us!
ОтветитьThis is cool i wish could make airsoft version ebb or gbb or hpa
ОтветитьM60 had that vietnam huey gunship
ОтветитьFn l c gbb comin soon in airsoft gbb vfc
ОтветитьLike barrel 30 BROWNING silencer cut down internal
Ответить