Ancient Earth: The Dawn of Mammals

Ancient Earth: The Dawn of Mammals

Best Documentary

2 дня назад

151,893 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@BANGDERR_YTch.
@BANGDERR_YTch. - 03.03.2025 06:27

Dari semua story quest karakter emang bareng Mizuki kita serasa dimanjain, tapi sayang banget, aku MC nya lumine😅kurang kena kesannya😅

Ответить
@Fredwinter-cv7tn
@Fredwinter-cv7tn - 03.03.2025 04:05

Wouderful clip thanks 🙏 thanks 🙏

Ответить
@Zombie-nx4ot
@Zombie-nx4ot - 02.03.2025 22:12

Y si en un universo paralelo o universos paralelos no se hubieran Extinguido los Dinosaurios

Ответить
@FgyFgy-k8q
@FgyFgy-k8q - 02.03.2025 21:22

😮❤الحمد لله على انقضاء هكذا مخلوقات مرعبه الحمد لله 😮الحمد لله 😮الحمد لله 😊❤

Ответить
@Alex.Vlasov..
@Alex.Vlasov.. - 02.03.2025 21:04

Все это лишь подтверждает Библию, что все эти животные и динозавры и млекопитающие уже были до потопа, но не все выжили во время потопа.

Ответить
@ТатьянаБакурская-п9ч
@ТатьянаБакурская-п9ч - 02.03.2025 20:36

Рассвет или расцвет?

Ответить
@warsoaftol5627
@warsoaftol5627 - 02.03.2025 17:11

غزات التاريخ و الاثار يحرفون كل شيء ،،هم من يكتب التاريخ فهم من يتحكم في اعلام

Ответить
@DomSimurg
@DomSimurg - 02.03.2025 17:03

Найденные в начале 21-го века окаменелости показывают палеонтологам, что первые современные млекопитающие появились на Земле 125 МИЛЛИОНОВ лет назад.
Но генетический анализ показывает, что они могли появиться ещё раньше.
Всё началось 250 миллионов лет назад в Триасовом периоде, когда этот мир был ОЧЕНЬ жарким.

Ответить
@romankotek6167
@romankotek6167 - 02.03.2025 16:15

Świetnie wytłumaczone i pokazane oczywiście łapka w górę.

Ответить
@eduardsjasinskis2981
@eduardsjasinskis2981 - 02.03.2025 15:46

Плохой звук

Ответить
@Kikifas
@Kikifas - 02.03.2025 15:42

Co za bzdury!!!
A Lisowicia Bojani???
Polscy paleontologowie dowiedli, że pierwsze ssaki, żyły już w Triasie i wcale nie w cieniu dinozaurów!
Lisowicia była wielkości słonia!!
Przestańcie powielać bzdury o małych ssakach w okresie Kredy, to już jest nieaktualne!
Boicie się, że Biblia ma rację!

Ответить
@mariangelesimazurcelay7669
@mariangelesimazurcelay7669 - 02.03.2025 14:49

Muy interesante el documento,,,pero, tengo mis dudas.

Ответить
@TheFasior
@TheFasior - 02.03.2025 14:26

Lektor jest kompletnie z dup*

Ответить
@ミクネコダイアリー
@ミクネコダイアリー - 02.03.2025 12:09

ほ乳類が恐竜に食われそうになるOP
こわすぎる😂

Ответить
@jeremylowe2309
@jeremylowe2309 - 02.03.2025 05:17

To whoever runs this channel, how do you get your vids? They obviously aren’t yours.

Ответить
@MiroslavZelenovic-f2s
@MiroslavZelenovic-f2s - 02.03.2025 01:45

Sad smo od pacova izgleda nastali a kad vidis 🦕 ist mi danas dve noge dve ruke koje ne koriste

Ответить
@Benjamitesarmy1992
@Benjamitesarmy1992 - 01.03.2025 21:00

Stop neighing after your 'friends' wives. Obey this Bible chapter to stay out of hell. Grow up.
1 Corinthians 7
King James Version
7 Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.

2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.

4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.

5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.

6 But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.

7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.

8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.

9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.

10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:

11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.

12 But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.

13 And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him.

14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

15 But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.

16 For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?

17 But as God hath distributed to every man, as the Lord hath called every one, so let him walk. And so ordain I in all churches.

18 Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.

19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.

20 Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called.

21 Art thou called being a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather.

22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ's servant.

23 Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.

24 Brethren, let every man, wherein he is called, therein abide with God.

25 Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord: yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful.

26 I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be.

27 Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife.

28 But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I spare you.

29 But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;

30 And they that weep, as though they wept not; and they that rejoice, as though they rejoiced not; and they that buy, as though they possessed not;

31 And they that use this world, as not abusing it: for the fashion of this world passeth away.

32 But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord:

33 But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife.

34 There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.

35 And this I speak for your own profit; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is comely, and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction.

36 But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.

37 Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.

38 So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.

39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.

40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Ответить
@savitrimishra4762
@savitrimishra4762 - 01.03.2025 20:32

आप ने बहुत ही अच्छा और व्यवस्थित जानकारी दी है आप को बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद ❤❤

Ответить
@WanderleyAlvesdeAraujo
@WanderleyAlvesdeAraujo - 01.03.2025 19:47

Como assim? Se o planeta Terra tem apenas 6 mil e poucos anos?

Ответить
@SuhaimiAmin-x8h
@SuhaimiAmin-x8h - 01.03.2025 18:42

Apa benarkah adenya zaman dinosor yg sebesar kapalterbang?atau zaman purba dimana semuanya tanpa pakaian?

Ответить
@Ketutsubadiyasa01
@Ketutsubadiyasa01 - 01.03.2025 17:45

Kalo ngomong satu bahasa aja dong kalian bingung jadi nya😂

Ответить
@정진수-j6e
@정진수-j6e - 01.03.2025 17:26

백악기 공룡시대를 몰래 훔쳐보고 싶습니다 ^^ 항상 흥미로워요

Ответить
@skiphope
@skiphope - 01.03.2025 17:19

pelajaran sejarah

Ответить
@akb0216
@akb0216 - 01.03.2025 17:11

fosil purba

Ответить
@SkipMedia
@SkipMedia - 01.03.2025 17:10

dunia prasejarah masih sederhana & kejam

Ответить
@gbe1988
@gbe1988 - 01.03.2025 13:31

That reading of the text by AI is distracting me. They used some deep fake in the translation and I'm analyzing what is wrong during reading the text instead of concentrating myself on the content. Please don't use AI in translation. It discourages people from watching those interesting movies.

Ответить
@TomMorrison-cc6xw
@TomMorrison-cc6xw - 01.03.2025 01:52

Lol. I was CERTAIN it would end with the meteor!

Ответить
@Алмаз-ъ2у
@Алмаз-ъ2у - 01.03.2025 01:33

Хмм довольно хороший документальный фильм мне понравился

Ответить
@TomMorrison-cc6xw
@TomMorrison-cc6xw - 01.03.2025 01:33

Thanks so much for the graphics showing what these animals looked like. When they kept placing blocks of stone down in front if the scientists, I had NO IDEA what they were seeing.

Ответить
@kriszukowski4530
@kriszukowski4530 - 28.02.2025 20:58

Not accurate enough. Dinosaurs were not wiped out by some Hollywood-style bam-bam sudden cosmic disaster. They were a very diverse group of reptiles that existed for much, much, I repeat much longer period of time – for around 180 million years - than our species. And they were already on the evolutionary way out when that presumed cosmic disaster struck around 65 million years ago. So change your script. Remember, Darwin never said anything about “survival of the fittest”. Instead he was in favour of the survival of the most adaptable.

Ответить
@gilvanioferreira8410
@gilvanioferreira8410 - 28.02.2025 16:46

Quanta besteira 😂

Ответить
@ВладимирПавлоград
@ВладимирПавлоград - 28.02.2025 15:53

Травы 🌿 не было тогда, а в фильме много травы на земле

Ответить
@Александр-э5о7х
@Александр-э5о7х - 28.02.2025 13:04

Пока выкапывают останки которым миллионы лет,вымирают современные животные и растения. Так что им работы до скончания веков.

Ответить
@EdoVargas-n9n
@EdoVargas-n9n - 28.02.2025 12:53

Mantap, terima kasih

Ответить
@davidmayhew8083
@davidmayhew8083 - 28.02.2025 11:33

This is a revelatory doc. I stopped watching Nova and National Geographic years ago because the productions were so cheesey. I'm assuming the degradation coincided with the rise of anti science politicians: Republicans. But here you have a wonderful example of state of the art production. I'll be looking for science related content outside of the US from here in out.

Ответить
@goinoutlikegeez
@goinoutlikegeez - 28.02.2025 08:20

This is fake news none of this is true I was there

Ответить
@Борис-в8я
@Борис-в8я - 28.02.2025 07:55

Срасибо, класс, люблю науку о происхождении жизни на земле, еше реревод хочу

Ответить
@FredericoRolim-k8p
@FredericoRolim-k8p - 28.02.2025 07:32

Os evolucionistas criaram a fantasia de que um Asteróide extinguiu os grandes dinossauros, e que pequenos mamíferos enfiados em buraquinhos no solo conseguiram sobreviver já que precisavam de pouca comida; agora descobriram que existiam mamíferos grandes na suposta época de mínimos 65 milhões de anos atrás, o que contradiz aquela primeira tese fajuta da extinção em massa; mas como bons evolucionistas os amantes da teoria inventam que por causa dos conjuntos de dentes diferentes, estes mamíferos grandes sobreviveram à catástrofe (uma explicação de merda que na verdade não explica nada). Mas o mais engraçado foi aquele francês retirando uma folha de um pedaço de solo, mostrando que ela estava flexível, como se tivesse sido colocada ali há pouco tempo, e decerto por meio de um aparelho de datação implantado no seu dedo ele apontou que a dita folha estava ali há 100 milhões de anos, fingindo não saber que um organismo com a tal datação já teria se tornado puro mineral há muito tempo. E assim vai este Frankenstein chamado teoria da evolução, que a cada momento recebe mais um enxerto de desculpa esfarrapada.

Ответить
- 28.02.2025 03:48

Dowiedziałem się z tego filmu, że pradawne ssaki ssały swoje młode... 😅😂😊

Ответить
@onyetyucub
@onyetyucub - 28.02.2025 01:55

Apakah mamalia sejenis harimau sudah ada?

Ответить
@roll411
@roll411 - 28.02.2025 00:39

Терапутус...

Ответить
@brentholladay3113
@brentholladay3113 - 28.02.2025 00:15

The biggest scam ever perpetuated!
It doesn’t matter how many zeros you continue to add on, you will never find adaptation from one species to another!
The Stokes monkey trials worked in the 1950s.
Today, everything points to a creator, a designer, an architect, God ❕
Cleverly created animation is all the facts this bogus science has to offer.
Every skeletal remains evolutionists have used have been debunked. It’s very amusing.😂

Ответить
@Realardians
@Realardians - 28.02.2025 00:14

Visual yg mengagumkan 🎉

Ответить
@tn9760
@tn9760 - 28.02.2025 00:07

Я всегда знал, что мой дедушка - мышь

Ответить
@SomeMan001
@SomeMan001 - 27.02.2025 22:22

الصينيون أساتذة في تصنيع كل شيء حتى الحفريات .. صراحة أشك في وثوقية حفريات الصين التي كثرت بشكل كبير

Ответить
@shibolinemress8913
@shibolinemress8913 - 27.02.2025 17:00

When was this originally broadcast?

Ответить
@JMDinOKC
@JMDinOKC - 27.02.2025 16:47

Well, about 50 years ago there was a "Dinosaur Renaissance." Now it's time for a "Mammal Renaissance."

Ответить
@wildnaturedocumentaryus
@wildnaturedocumentaryus - 27.02.2025 11:59

An extraordinary documentary that immerses you in nature’s raw power.

Ответить
@radosawpiwowarski6480
@radosawpiwowarski6480 - 27.02.2025 07:46

Ale chujowo zrobione

Ответить
@GriseledTroll
@GriseledTroll - 27.02.2025 06:51

This was released in 2018

Ответить