Комментарии:
helikopterperen
ОтветитьARMA 3 the best!👊
ARMA 3 with mods is a complete war simulator, SQUAD is not!
squad is trash
ОтветитьShould I get both?
ОтветитьArma 3 is just like Asseto Corsa Competitive of fps. Super realistic, super fun to play but man you need to learn A LOT and play a lot to really enjoy it at its best. (Also, the controls are also pretty confusing but they can be used to)
Ответитьnow compare squad to arma reforger.
ОтветитьHonestly buddy you can get the same look in arma as you have in squad can not even really compare the 2 side by side because squad lacks mods. And lacks growth feel like fighting in a based Iraq war with all the equipment used then can do so wanna play ww2 with all that equipment can do so wanna play a modern war Ukraine Russian can do that. Arma allows you to set up pretty accurate war games based off past wars squad dose not. Squad is more for that cod player looking for something little extra, well arma is more that skilled based player looking for a real world shooter with the equipment to back it. As for milsim arma remains the original and have not seen many step up to it as it's in a complete league of it's own and has been used by the military
Ответитьshort and sweet, three years later you have influenced my decision greatly! cheers to a new revolution of "Mil-Sim"
ОтветитьWho TF said these games weren't milsims?
ОтветитьOne thing you didn't mention was that Arma is much more PvE focused than Squad. A big part of arma is doing large scale missions with unique objectives like destroying radio towers and rescuing hostages. I bought Squad but was dissapointed since all the gamemodes were variations of conquest from battlefield and felt way more arcady. I can see why people enjoy it but its just not a the kind of game I was looking for. I think comparing the two games to eachother is a little unfair to both. They have very different experiences
Ответитьi really enjoy arma 3 just because of the zeus gamemode, sog praire fire, mods, and the editor
i have played squad for only a couple of hours during a free weekend, for some reason i ran into some heavy performance and graphics issues (i could see grainy effect in the distance, i had resolution set to my monitor) when i did and it left a bad taste in my friends mouths
i dont know why i had such issues with squad because everyone else online seems to have no issues but i never figured it out because again, free weekend
Do you think the game will run on my Laptop where I have an GTX 1650, 8 GB Ram and Intel Core I5-10300H CPU 2.50 GHz
Ответитьif squad runs BETTER than arma 3... how shit fps then ARMA has 💀
ОтветитьJust bought squad and I'm so excited I am worried though that my potato PC won't play it.
Poor boy chronicles.
I play arma and squad,but squad have weird maps,i will pick the arma3
Ответитьover 1000 hours with ARMA which is the only game I have played for the past 3 years and I am still learning new features. Squad is a hell of a lot of fun and a fun shooter but it just cant match the complexity and range of possibilities you have in arma. to Laser guiding your own smart bombs from a targeting pod on your aircraft to setting up unmanned stugna missile turrets and ambushing convoys remotely km's away its just on a level of military satisfaction no other game can match in my opinion. and the firefights and sound design are just mwaah. There are literal hundreds of game modes and ways to play due to DLC's and the enormous steam workshop mods. That being said Squad is a close second in terms of milsims but leaves a lot to be desired and gets boring quickly if you're a long time arma player. Oh and it has Vietnam.. enough said
ОтветитьI couldn't make a decision, so I bought both and now I have 200+ hours on both. 10/10 would buy both.
ОтветитьCan wait to see arma 4 on the new engine 🙏
ОтветитьI couldn’t decide so I bought both
ОтветитьArma 3 is better.
ОтветитьBig difference: Arma has a lot of single player scenarios, including campaign missions (the most realistic i've seen) or missions mods, apart from the multiplayer. Squad has only multiplayer. Anyway, i love both games. Squad is more like a realistic Battlefield. Arma is more like its unique thing. I would recommend you begin with Squad; it can be addictive. Arma is not for everyone; but is closer to reality.
ОтветитьArma 3 > Squad
Squads engine doesn’t feel true to scale if that makes sense. I genuinely feel like arma has better graphics. Squad has better visual effects but depth and how natural the controls feel goes to arma for sure.
Give me your laptop 😤
ОтветитьArma for absolute Freedom, also to be sent out to space by a bicycle.
ОтветитьThese aren't arcade games
They are strategic games
If u want fun there's call of duty my boii
Opinion:
Buy both, both are awesome in their own way
arma 3 has way more features and way more ways to play especially if you play alone. squad pretty much has 2 game modes to play and is only online 0 single player options. there was a zues mod that worked very well for a while but the modding community is trash and pretty much all squad mods with the exception of galactic contention are either out of date and dont get updated ever or they just dont work. buy arma 3 5 times the game squad is regardless of graphics. i dont pay for graphics i pay for fun games and arma is infinitely more fun
ОтветитьYet the only I get is Project Reality
Ответитьthing i hate about arma 3 is you have to buy access to snipers, helicopters, and planes
Ответитьyou should remake this video every couple of years
ОтветитьI’ve also never gotten trained in arma 3 I jus play with ransoms sometimes they take it to seriouse and we argue 🤷♀️but sometimes they be fun af 🤣
ОтветитьI don’t play modded arma tbh and it’s so fun I have 200. Hours I recently got into the 55th br server I think das what’s it called it’s the best multiplayer server in my opinion you can fly wtv yu eant except cas
ОтветитьBuy all or nothing
Ответитьbuy both lol
ОтветитьThe one thing that I dislike about ArmA is that a normal map, Altis for example, has thousands of houses but none of the houses have furniture, and I believe it is like that because when the game was fiest launched it couldn't have handled all that objects. But I think newer maps like Livonia from the Contact DLC has furniture
ОтветитьNice video! Btw do you think sqaud can run on a gtx 1650, i5 9400f and 8gb ddr4 ram? I Will get a new pc in the future that Will be able to run it but for now this is what i have
ОтветитьSquad > Arma 3
ОтветитьSadly Squad just own by a greedy chinese piece of shit company, Tencent.
Ответитьi appreciate rust getting a shoutout
ОтветитьI have both
ОтветитьProject Reality >>>>>> Squad >>>> ARMA 3
ОтветитьI tried Arma III and yeah it's not exactly accessible. If I had friends pushing me to play it I might have kept it, but trying to navigate it solo was daunting... also the campaign is very boring, so even using it as a jump off was a no go.
ОтветитьI love Arma but my biggest issue with it is sometimes it feels like you need to learn to fix an engine just to drive a car
ОтветитьI hope when Arma IV comes the graphics question to be solved
ОтветитьIn my opinion squad is better in graphics...that would be remaining in Arma...but squad I think it's more limited about content and creating tools as a sandbox like Arma
ОтветитьArma
Ответитьi think squad is just for fun and arma is for being all serious and profesionall
Ответитьarma is better
Ответить