Комментарии:
I bought one of your books. Then i chance upon your channel and everything is about pissing on other people. Feels small and catty. That is underwhelming.
ОтветитьI try to prove spritiual theories with science (as a hobby) and I also make mistakes. I dont really understand the critic of Huberman. If something is wrong in science, you can disprove it with science. He always quotes the studies and you should always read them. If Soberg really made mistakes these mistakes are in her papers, so you can disprove them. Science can be reproduced and you get the same results every time. Scientists dont put intentionally wrong science out there, because they could lose their jobs and reputation. Scientists in the STEM fields have the least mistakes by the way.
ОтветитьOnce Huberman gives advice on psychology or other medical advice, I stop listening. He is unquestionably good on brain and optic but not other fields. It takes different level of years of years of studying, researching and undestanding it. Yes, I still listen to him when he is talking about just brain.
ОтветитьHey Scott, quick question, do you still recommend the Wim Hof Method?
ОтветитьHe just forgot to disclose that info. Wink wink 😉
I'm sure that is honest mistake by Huberman. Wink wink 😉
He just wanted to help that lady, as she is doing a big favor to a humanity. Wink wink 😉
Great video as usual, thanks!
ОтветитьWhen I originally watched the interview with soberg I just kept thinking, they must have been intimate because there's something flying around between them.
But I was like ah he's a professional, now I look back and that and wonder.
Ofc this is their business if that was the case though I don't care about it but I did wonder about that at the time.
As always - you’ve got to follow the money Scott
ОтветитьIncredible fact finding here. Would love to see some further work on the ill-advised use of hyperventilation as a daily practice (mouth breathing dust particles, lack of NO2 uptake, bohr effect and not releasing enough O2 to muscles due to lack of CO2, no nasal breathing, overall insensitivity to CO2 in the bloodstream, all red flags). The proof is seen in recent Hof guided videos where you can clearly hear him take deep, labored breaths in-between sentences - a clear indicator of long term, over breathing as a result of using the method. Why is this method advocated? Keep up the great work.
ОтветитьHe was probably sleeping with her.
ОтветитьHaven’t had this much fun with someone in a while 😂
ОтветитьThey got to sell the magazines somehow
ОтветитьYou provide absolutely no evidence that Huberman had anything to do with the article getting accepted or getting on the cover. Was he the handling editor? Were there conflicting peer reviews? What is your professional issue with the actual science of Søberg? Further, is Huberman the person in charge of what gets to the cover of the Cell Press (that really would be newsworthy given that he’s not the editor-in-chief).
It honestly seems like you are grasping at straws, systematically searching for anything related to the guy that you can spin (or free associate) in a negative light. Yet you seem to think you’re Woodward or Bernstein. It seems quite sad to be honest.
SAY IT AIN’T SO.
ОтветитьGOT TO ADMIT THIS GUY THOROUGHLY DUPED ME
Ответить😲 keep digging! Grateful for your posts!
ОтветитьIt's clear what Søberg got from this, but wondering what did Huberman got out of that?
ОтветитьYou are a hater 🤦🏾♀️. Be a bigger person and stay focused on what you’re building instead of kicking people whole they are already down. Don’t let your life be about someone else
ОтветитьScott... You are talking about what Andrew and Susanna did like it is something unusual or uncommon.. You are explaining the entire conflict of interest that penetrates the entire system... Is this somehow a bigger scandal for them than it is for the others? Or is it just because they are both pretty? Everyone who has to answer to a sponsor has sh***y science. While sponsorship and money is involved in deciding what is and what is not science... I saw three different videos with Andrew pushing peptides last week... The conflict of interest you talk about is in existence for all of them... Except for the ones who break away......... And if you want to keep your licenses and certifications and MONEY I guess that's out of the question... But when you operate in INTEGRITY you don't NEED ANY OF THEM. And you still get the money. It takes a good dose of bravery and iron will.... CONNECTING TO THE LOVE THAT ACTUALLY GOT YOU INTERESTED IN THE SCIENCE IN THE FIRST PLACE
ОтветитьScott! Thank you for posting. again!
ОтветитьHey man! I am new to the channel and really enjoy your way of speaking and thinking (found you through your quotes on the New Yorker article). I will say, just like a few of the other commenters on this post, I am a little put off by your persistence with the Huberman story. On the one hand, I think your coverage is helping us better understand who Huberman is, especially as a scientist. But on the other, I get this unsettling feeling that you are just milking the story and disparaging him in the process. I would just love to have some transparency on your end for why you are covering this story is so much detail because it really is hard to trust people on the internet these days. With all respect, I hope you understand my point.
ОтветитьThis is my logic why I stopped to listen Huberman podcast
The main benefit for me was - trustworthy material from science. But if person behaves like sociopath or narcissist - I loose trust immediately, as psychotherapist I know how often they are lying for benefits. I don’t trust any word from Hubermans part. Especially about scientific critic I knew already from you, thank you.
But how about guests. It’s also interesting. Guest chooses to not confront this fact, because there is no feedback from Huberman about situation - it means guests are choosing consciously his side. Side of manipulation, lying, playing with facts. Why I should trust this guest in this case? I don’t. And don’t recommend anyone.
Cell Reports Medicine has a dreadful Schimago H ranking.
ОтветитьI think he was trying to recruit the author to his harem if she wasn’t already in it. Did anyone see his live with her? Wasn’t she in Denmark? Isn’t that where his dad moved? Maybe he wanted some supply there.
ОтветитьHe’s criticized for not having enough women on the podcast and criticized for promoting a female scientist’s work. Can’t win 😅
ОтветитьYou may consider getting some therapy for whatever issues you have with Huberman. If you're just trying to get clicks more power to you. If not; you should probably reach out for some help. Good luck to you.
ОтветитьIs the Huberman podcast on Alcohol true…?
ОтветитьIf cold water therapy produces brown fat then why does Wim’s brother who does none of Wim’s protocols have nearly twice as much brown fat? So much for cold water immersion producing brown fat!
ОтветитьSomething stinks here! This bloke sounds like a 'deeply spurned wonan'. And his dramatic gestures made me laugh!!! ah!!! H has some interesting stuff but he never interested me. Leave H alone
Ответить...woman ..
ОтветитьDamn I noticed Dr Huberman changing his tune for cold exposure and cold showers and all… never knew it was this fishy
ОтветитьWatch Huberman's video where he talks to Søberg on his channel. He's flirting. It's obvious.
ОтветитьDo we know that Andrew was the action editor for her paper? Big journals have tons of editors so are we sure that he handled her paper and sent it out for review?
ОтветитьIn addition to money, I think Uberman slept with her to go on out for her. In one of Uberman interview, he hinted that people within his work sphere slept with each other and it was okay... check out Sam Vaknin book on Malignant self love: Narcissism. I worked with disturbed kids and I can spot someone like Uberman and his bros from far away.
ОтветитьGreat video. This huberman business has gotten far enough. It’s completely out of control on linked in where he constantly slates vital medication taken by vulnerable populations.
ОтветитьIt is strange how big grifting has gotten. I’m beginning to wonder whether this kind of behaviour would be a fairly serious personality disorder. He must know he is lying because he studies neuroscience- it’s the constant repeated lying that is quite concerning.
Ответить