The United States NEW Longest Range Missile SM-6 / Aim-174B Vs The F-22 Raptor | DCS |

I wonder why the Obama Administration killed the F-22 production line............................................

The problem with merely increasing the missile size, is that you also increase the missile's inertia. That means that the missile is going to want to keep going in whatever direction it's already going, which means that it's going to have a hard time hitting a small, manoeuvring target.

Super slugish hornet!

The F15EX would make the most of those 174B's. Long range radar, increased thrust, stronger airframe, all make those missiles more effective. 😁🤩

GS hoping his AMRAAMs shoot down the AIM-174Bs makes me wonder if the Peregrine missile in development could be used as a self defense missile. Raptor could carry 4 AIM-260s and 4 Peregrines (assuming two Peregrines can fit where one AIM-120/260 is mounted), use the AIM-260s offensively, and maybe use the Peregrine to shoot down enemy missiles.

I wonder if the new Peregrines would be best for this sort of mission. You'd have a couple more shots.

F14b w AIM-54c. Vs f18 w AIM-174b

China sending a mass fleet of ships and planes towards Taiwan, so a flight of B-52's loaded with AIM-174Bs up the wazoo, and Cruise missiles, defended by EA-18G Growlers with multiple F-35s on point as spotters, providing coordinates and all that, with an F-22 handling a rumored Russian Su-57 presence in the invasion.

Could have Super Hornets from a nearby US fleet providing additional air cover if needed, and the fleet itself providing tomahawks and harpoons.

When the missile you're fending off has a bigger RCS than you...

all this tech still dies from a lone f22

can you get the Dark Star with mods ?

The hornet should have fired the SM6s and then run away to show how it's not just more dangerous, but also more survivable.

It's supposed to be super long range and 18 miles is still 'too far' for them? What is it supposed to hit at its stated max range? A stationary target on the ground?

You have very interesting videos of the new missiles. Please tell me. Where can I get mods for aircraft and missiles that you show in the videos? I would very much like to evaluate F-22 and F-18 with these missiles in TacView.

Why do amramms have such low range?

If you shoot and notch you are actively dragging the bandit's missile out of the path of your Amraam.

Interesting video, though I think most of us know that no hornet or AWACS is getting a lock on a Raptor at the ranges it did here… seeing is one thing, a lock for tracking is another.
Fun to watch anyway!

How are those things falling out of the sky at that range? The SM6 has a 150 mile range even when fired from sea level. At 30 miles is should still be coming down on you at mach 5.

2 hornets with Aim-174b's vs 1 Raptor would be spicy.

Day 490 549th time asking for a reenactment of Sam City in the A6 Intruder from Flight of the Intruder, movie version. Talk to HeatBlur about their A6E.

You should have done this with a j20 instead of the raptor

How can these missiles see the F-22 so well? Should their radar not be a lot less powerful?

A real cat and mouse battle. You were "Iceman" and let the other guy make the mistake.

You going to do amy vids on the Block III Hornet?

I'd LOVE to see this same fight, but with the F-14 carrying the 174's instead.

more R-37M vs aim174

Would like to see all your videos at night in the mountains.

Awesome fight! Would love to see you play this from the F-18 Aim-174B side/

im confused a 200+ mile missile barely runs out of steam at 30 miles at low altitude?

Now I'm wondering what happens when you strap one of these missiles... on the Raptor. Or the F35. Maybe that could be a super interesting fight, F35 with SM-6 vs F22 with AMRAAMs.

why both the sm-6 & amraam lofted even with such low & close distance launch?

If he had roughly double the MAR, why wouldn't he have let you close to that fire his last missile or two.... since you had to eventually. Maybe fire off an Amraam instead of that last 174 to fool you.

That SM-6 is no joke!

Question, I'm not a DCS player, Do all these fight scenarios start from a cold start every time? Some are BVR and others are the merge, do they just start each time in flight or on the ground?

Day 31 of F-4 VS. Viggen

Why not 2 AMRAAM to start with?
(killing my ocd)

I'm still curious, if anyone has done any testing on a missiles ballistic coefficient, like bullets. I would think that a higher BC would make a missile more efficient and longer ranged, even in a low altitude engagement. This is from a guy that asked fighter pilots about the thrust to weight ratio of the missiles they carried! 😂

17 minutes with a f22 is really good

Where the new MACO hypersonic mission at?

Day 3 of asking for A-10 Vs F-4 Phantom

If he had a data link with a US Navy surface ship with the AN/SPS-49 air search radar it would give him a big help. That powerful L Band radar has proven pretty effective at detecting "stealth" platforms.

Although probably not modeled accurately in DCS, I wonder how the changing aspect of the F-22 affects its radar signature. For example, does notching (giving the missile a side view) give that missile a stronger radar contact to track?

I have to wonder how much these impact the performance of a F/A-18? Kind of makes you wish we had the Tomcat 21, if it could carry 6 Phoenix it could probably also carry 6 of the AIM-174.

I remember way back in about 1984 or so brainstorming with a GMM shipmate of mine about if this could be done with the SM-2 ER like we carried on USS Preble DDG-46. Apparently we were ahead of our time but back then the F-14 and the AIM-54 Phoenix were still around. It was in the middle of a long Indian Ocean deployment and we had a lot of time on our hands for stuff like that!

Heldentod! 😃

Do the missions from red storm rising

I've always wondered in these scenarios why don't you take out the airborne radar first, thus greatly hampering OPFOR?

Chaffing not changing missile mind's 😅

I see everyone talking about being able to guide the 174's from different platforms. See if it's possible to cook up a mission to where there's an entire strike-fighter squadron of F/A-18Fs holding like 4-6 AIM-174s which are guided by an AWACS, F-35C, Patriot or something to conduct air patrol and take out an entire enemy fighter wall while a fleet of F/A-18Es conduct a strike on a nearby airbase, taken over city, or any enemy territory. This would be a pure NAVY Mission with all fighters including the AWACS taking off from a Super Carrier.