This Man was Reading the New World Translation Until I Came Along

what is your reaction to muslims? are they satanic too?

Regarding the wealth of JW.
They are considered 40th on the wealth list in US. THAT means 39 religious organizations have more wealth, but you mentioned nothing of them.
Neither did you mention the main line evangelist, I have attached information on ONLY five. There are many, many more!
Further, while mainline organizations are declining in population ,Jw are increasing , now numbering more than 9 million. Thank you.

wealthiest preachers in America, along with estimated net worths:
Kenneth Copeland: Estimated net worth: $300 million.
Joel Osteen: Estimated net worth: $100 million.
Steven Furtick: Estimated net worth: $60 million.
Benny Hinn: Estimated net worth: $60 million.
Creflo Dollar: Estimated net worth: $30 million.

Whoever has the Son."::
Yes , JESUS IS THE SON OF GOD, NOT GOD THE SON!
YES , JESUS DIED AS A SACRIFIIAL DEATH IN EXCHANGE FOR ADAMIC SIN . ONE PERFECT HUMAN IN EXCHANGE FOR ANOTHER. NOTHING WAS SAID ABOUT BEING BORN AGAIN TO RECIEVE THE BLESSING OF JESUS SACRIFICE.
BEING BORN AGAIN IS A SPIRITUAL REBIRTH FROM PHYSICAL TO SPIRITUAL BEING TO BECOME A CORULER IN HEAVEN . I HAVE ATTACHED SOME INFORMATION FOR THE VIEWERS . I SUGGEST THAT EACH PERSON HAVE HAVE A BIBLE STUDY WITH JEHOVAHS WITNESSE TO GET THE FACTS.

Colossians 2:9✖
For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
οτιthatενin(to)αυτωto himκατοικειhe residesπανallτοtheπληρωμαcompletenessτηςof theθεοτητοςof deityσωματικωςbodily
The word θεοτητος is a form of the noun marked similar below. This form's case is genitive (which usually indicates "of"), its number is single, and its gender is feminine.
Abarim Publications' online Biblical Greek Dictionary
θεος
The word θεος (theos) means God, but although that may seem like an open-and-shut case it really isn't. In fact, our word θεος (theos) is fantastically complicated. To start with, it also covers humans (John 10:34) and even what seems to be the devil (2 Corinthians 4:4). There's clearly more to the word θεος (theos) than simply offering a kind of genus for the Creator to be classified as. In the New Testament, this noun occurs 1340 times; see full concordance. Let's have a look at this mysterious word.

Questions From Readers

● In John 1:1 the term “god” is applied to both the Father and the Son, the Word. But in the Greek text the word for “god” (theos) is written differently in these two instances. Why? What does it mean?

To a person unfamiliar with the Greek language it might seem that there is a significance indicated by the fact that first the word is spelled theon and next theos. But the difference is simply a matter of complying with the Greek grammatical case used.

John 1:1 reads: “In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God [τὸν θεὸν, literally, the god], and the Word was a god [θεὸς].”

Greek has five cases​—nominative, genitive, dative, accusative and vocative. How a word is spelled can vary depending on the case in which it is used. Take, as an example, the definite article “the.” In the masculine gender “the” is respectively written in the first four of these cases: ὁ, τοῦ, τῷ, τὸν, in the singular number.

Similarly, in John 1:1 the word theos is spelled in accord with the particular case being employed. In the first instance (“the Word was with God”) it is in the accusative case and thus is spelled θεὸν But in the second occurrence it is in the nominative case, and so it is spelled θεὸς. The spelling of theos does not of itself indicate the person or position of the one designated, as 2 Corinthians 4:4, 6 illustrates. In 2 Co 4 verse four Satan is identified as θεὸς, “the god of this system of things,” and in 2 Co 4 verse six the Creator is designated θεὸς. The spelling is theos in both verses, for the nominative case is used in each. So the fact that theos is spelled differently in its two occurrences in John 1:1 does not show any difference in meaning; “god” is the meaning in both instances.

What is interesting is that in John 1:1 the definite article ὁ [ho] is not used in front of theos when applied to the Son, the Word. Regarding this point the noted Bible translator William Barclay writes:

“Now normally, except for special reasons, Greek nouns always have the definite article in front of them, . . . When a Greek noun has not got the article in front of it, it becomes rather a description than an identification, and has the character of an adjective rather than of a noun. We can see exactly the same in English. If I say: ‘James is the man’, then I identify James with some definite man whom I have in mind; but, if I say: ‘James is man’, then I am simply describing James as human, and the word man has become a description and not an identification. If John had said ho theos ēn ho logos, using a definite article in front of both nouns, then he would definitely have identified the logos [the Word] with God, but because he has no definite article in front of theos it becomes a description, and more of an adjective than a noun. The translation then becomes, to put it rather clumsily, ‘The Word was in the same class as God, belonged to the same order of being as God ‘. . . . John is not here identifying the Word with God. To put it very simply, he does not say that Jesus was God.”​—Many Witnesses, One Lord (1963), pages 23, 24.

Hence, in both their translations Dr. Edgar J. Goodspeed and Dr. James Moffatt render the phrase as, “the Word [or Logos] was divine.” This reflects the fine distinction in wording that the apostle John used, a distinction that accords with the fact that Jesus was not equal in power and eternity with the Father but was the created Son of the Father. (1 Cor. 11:3) The New World Translation accurately renders the Joh 1 verse 1: “In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.”

God-by-nature. John L. McKenzie ****(Catholic Biblical scholar) wrote that ho Theos is God the Father, and adds that John 1:1 should be translated "the word was with the God [=the Father], and the word was a divine being."

Hebrews 9:27 and John 10:28-30? Do these verses seem contradictory in meaning to them?
Give us an example please. When I was a Baptist every other verse seem to contradict something. Since I've been a Witness all my confusion has disappeared and no verses are contradictory. I can give you an example.

I always wondered why Jesus said, in the Sermon on the Mount, “Happy are the mild-tempered, since they will inherit the earth.” Matthew 5:5. Since I was being taught that you go to heaven when you die, I couldn’t figure out why you would want to inherit the earth. What would you do with it? No one ever answered that question for me until I ask one of Jehovah's Witnesses, and he answered me promptly and from the Bible.

What specific debt relief options (e.g., consolidation, management plans, settlement) are most suitable for seniors born around 1970 or before who owe more than $10,000 on credit cards?
Still unknown to many Seniors with over $10,000 in credit card debt is a brilliant financial relief rule that could benefit so many Seniors and consolidate over $10,000 of their credit card debts! Many are even getting up to $200,000 consolidated!

So what exactly is the "rule"?

The #1 rule we have for anyone with over $10,000 in credit card debt is to check if you qualify for debt consolidation through this private debt consolidation program. This program has helped thousands of US residents with over $2 billion in debt!

You could be paying for your home renovations, fund your business, & even ta

Hebrews 9:27

27 And just as it is reserved for men to die once for all time, but after this to receive a judgment,

Before Christ made it, and that was a miracle, there was only death forever as the Bible teaches. There was no salvation without Christ. So now because of Christ there is a judgement for all of us. So, in John 5 we see that there is a judgement for MOST people who are resurrected on earth.

The only way before Christ was dead forever as there is no “eternal soul” found in the Bible. That was put there by pagan emperors and kings to make it so people who did not do what the “god anointed” ruler tells them they then have this fantasy of torturing in hellfire forever. Life under tyrants was so bad that death would seem like a good option rather than going out and killing people for these emperors and kings. So this fake idea of eternal soul is needed to get them to kill for the emperor. “You will suffer forever if you don’t do what I say”; so saith the “god installed” emperor or king.

God is Love, Mercy, Forgiveness and Justice. Not a monster. These emperors and kings were the monsters who put that pagan nonsense in their religions and mistranslated Bibles.

John 5: 28–30 explains it.

27 And he has given him authority to do judging,+ because he is the Son of man. 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment. 30 I cannot do a single thing of my own initiative. Just as I hear, I judge, and my judgment is righteous because I seek, not my own will, but the will of him who sent me.

If you want to know more about what is required for salvation, get a free Bible Study from Jehovah’s Witnesses and you will be amazed at what you learn.

The key to everlasting life is here:

John 17: 3 This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ.

[knowing Jehovah and the one he created and sent, Jesus Christ, is required. And knowing what is required for eternal life is explained by Jesus Christ.]

Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the Kingdom of the heavens, but only the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will.

So, to have the best possible chance for life in God’s Kingdom, is to do what God teaches in the Bible and it is not that difficult.

proskuneo as obeisance vs. worship:

The verb proskuneo is used fifty-eight times in the New Testament. When the King James translation was made, the word picked to best convey the meaning of the Greek word was "worship." At that time, the English word "worship" had a range of meaning close to what I have suggested for the Greek word proskuneo. It could be used for the attitude of reverence given to God, but also for the act of prostration. The word was also used as a form of address to people of high status, in the form "your worship." So the King James translation committee made a pretty good choice.

But modern English is not King James English, and the range of the meaning for the word "worship" has narrowed considerably. Today, we use it only for religious veneration of God, so it no longer covers all of the uses for the Greek verb proskuneo, or of the English word in the day of King James. For this reason, it is necessary that modern translations find appropriate terms to accurately convey precisely what is implied by the use of proskuneo in the various passages where it appears. If they fail to do this, and cling to the old English word "worship" without acknowledging its shift of meaning since the days of King James, they mislead their readers into thinking that every greeting, kiss, or prostration in the Bible is an act of worship directed to a god. (p. 42)

Then it goes on to say :

Rendering a single Greek word into more than one English alternative is not necessarily inaccurate in and of itself. Since Greek words such as proskuneo have a range of possible meanings, it is not practical to insist that a Greek word always be translated the same way. . . . But in our exploration of this issue, we can see how theological bias has been the determining context for the choices made by all of the translations except the NAB and NWT. There are passages where many translators have interpreted the gesture referred to by the Greek term proskuneo as implying "worship." They then have substituted that interpretation in place of a translation.

I am not going to enter into a debate over interpretation. It is always possible that the interpretation of the significance of the gesture may be correct. But the simple translation "prostrate," or "do homage," or "do obeisance" is certainly correct. So the question is raised, why depart from a certain, accurate translation to a questionable, possibly inaccurate one?

The answer is that, when this occurs, the translators seem to feel the need to add to the New Testament support for the idea that Jesus was recognized to be God. But the presence of such an idea cannot be supported by selectively translating a word one way when it refers to Jesus and another way when it refers to someone else. . . . They might argue that the context of belief surrounding Jesus implies that the gesture is more than "obeisance" or "homage." It's not a very good argument, because in most of the passages the people who make the gesture know next to nothing about Jesus, other than that it is obvious or rumored that he has power to help them. (pp. 47-48)

Can’t we use John 10: 30 “I and the Father are one” to prove the Trinity?
No, because John 10:30 with logical links to other scriptures is this.


But, brain washed crowds would act like this.


If you want to prove the trinity don’t use John 10:30. Try Mark 17:3 instead. Or read the scriptures in this diagram.


You are welcome. 😁

In answer to the question above, no. The scripture of John 10:30 cannot be used to “prove” the unbiblical “Trinity.”

When stating, “I and the Father are one.” Christ Jesus did not imply that he and his Father were of “one substance” or “the same Deity.” On the contrary, in his explanation to the Jews, Christ Jesus had explained that he and his Heavenly Father were “One” in unity and in purpose, as well as in agreement.

In the scripture of John 17:21-23, Christ had even further expanded on this meaning of “oneness” with his Father in Heaven. While in prayer to his God and Father, Jesus stated:

“So that they may all be one, JUST AS, you Father, are in me and I am in you, so that they may also be one WITH US. That the world may believe that you Father, sent me. I have given them the glory that you have given me, in order that they may be one JUST AS, we are one. I am one with them and you are one with me, in order that they may be perfected into one, so that the world may know that you sent me and that you loved them, just as you loved me.” -John 17:21-23

Now, as can be clearly be observed in the verse above. While in prayer to his God and Father in the Heavens, not only did the Christ ask of his Father to continue to watch over his disciples and to keep sanctifying them(John 17:11;15-17), but the verse also shows that the Christ asked, wanted and desired for his Followers to become “one,” in the exact manner or JUST AS, he and his Father were one.

Therefore, in conclusion. One must then ask themselves. If Christ's disciples or Christians are to be “one” in the exact manner or “just as” the Christ and his Father were “one,” then truly, in what sense are Christians to be “one?”

Are we, as Christians, commanded to be “one” in the sense of unity and togetherness? Or, are we to unreasonably conclude that the Christ had expected his disciples to be “one,” in the sense of “one substance” or a singular Human Entity?

(Remember. Christ had asked and had desired for his followers “to be one” in the exact manner or “just as,” he and his Heavenly Father were “one.”)

Thus. For those who attempt to assert that Jesus had claimed that he and his Father were “one substance” or “one Deity” in John 10:30. Please, answer the question above wisely,

Are we to conclude that Jesus had expected his disciples to become “one,” in the sense of “one substance” or a singular Human Entity?

Not only that. But, if you dare claim that John 10:30 supposedly “proves” the unbiblical Trinity, then wouldn't the scripture of John 17:21-23 teach that Christians are also a part of said “Trinity” or a Quadrinity(Quaternity), since Christians are to be “one” with Christ and his Father, as is explained in John 17:21-23?

Truly, is that a reasonable conclusion?

Questions From Readers

● In John 1:1 the term “god” is applied to both the Father and the Son, the Word. But in the Greek text the word for “god” (theos) is written differently in these two instances. Why? What does it mean?

To a person unfamiliar with the Greek language it might seem that there is a significance indicated by the fact that first the word is spelled theon and next theos. But the difference is simply a matter of complying with the Greek grammatical case used.

John 1:1 reads: “In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God [τὸν θεὸν, literally, the god], and the Word was a god [θεὸς].”

Greek has five cases​—nominative, genitive, dative, accusative and vocative. How a word is spelled can vary depending on the case in which it is used. Take, as an example, the definite article “the.” In the masculine gender “the” is respectively written in the first four of these cases: ὁ, τοῦ, τῷ, τὸν, in the singular number.

Similarly, in John 1:1 the word theos is spelled in accord with the particular case being employed. In the first instance (“the Word was with God”) it is in the accusative case and thus is spelled θεὸν But in the second occurrence it is in the nominative case, and so it is spelled θεὸς. The spelling of theos does not of itself indicate the person or position of the one designated, as 2 Corinthians 4:4, 6 illustrates. In 2 Co 4 verse four Satan is identified as θεὸς, “the god of this system of things,” and in 2 Co 4 verse six the Creator is designated θεὸς. The spelling is theos in both verses, for the nominative case is used in each. So the fact that theos is spelled differently in its two occurrences in John 1:1 does not show any difference in meaning; “god” is the meaning in both instances.

What is interesting is that in John 1:1 the definite article ὁ [ho] is not used in front of theos when applied to the Son, the Word. Regarding this point the noted Bible translator William Barclay writes:

“Now normally, except for special reasons, Greek nouns always have the definite article in front of them, . . . When a Greek noun has not got the article in front of it, it becomes rather a description than an identification, and has the character of an adjective rather than of a noun. We can see exactly the same in English. If I say: ‘James is the man’, then I identify James with some definite man whom I have in mind; but, if I say: ‘James is man’, then I am simply describing James as human, and the word man has become a description and not an identification. If John had said ho theos ēn ho logos, using a definite article in front of both nouns, then he would definitely have identified the logos [the Word] with God, but because he has no definite article in front of theos it becomes a description, and more of an adjective than a noun. The translation then becomes, to put it rather clumsily, ‘The Word was in the same class as God, belonged to the same order of being as God ‘. . . . John is not here identifying the Word with God. To put it very simply, he does not say that Jesus was God.”​—Many Witnesses, One Lord (1963), pages 23, 24.

Hence, in both their translations Dr. Edgar J. Goodspeed and Dr. James Moffatt render the phrase as, “the Word [or Logos] was divine.” This reflects the fine distinction in wording that the apostle John used, a distinction that accords with the fact that Jesus was not equal in power and eternity with the Father but was the created Son of the Father. (1 Cor. 11:3) The New World Translation accurately renders the Joh 1 verse 1: “In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.”

If Jesus's body was gone from the tomb, where do the Jehovah's witnesses think his body went?❤

So glad you gave him the real Bible.

Very similar has happened before. (Acts 13:8-10) "But Elymas the sorcerer (for that is how his name is translated) began opposing them, trying to turn the proconsul away from the faith... ...will you not quit distorting the right ways of Jehovah?" (Acts 13:40) "Therefore, watch out that what is said in the Prophets does not come upon you..."

What's the relevance of this pastor's argument? Can we not just agree to imitate Christ's love rather than get into theological spats and badmouthing? Anyway, the concept of a literal Hell is now controversial in Christianity.

just let people believe what they choose its that simple ,,,,

I am Chinese and was born in Malaysia. My first language is Chinese. My second language is English, and I also speak Malay, which is my country's official language.

Recently, I have been watching your videos a lot and have subscribed to your channel. I am very interested in your story about converting from Islam to Christianity.

I have some questions about Christian beliefs, especially about what a person must do to enter heaven on Judgment Day.

Bro, God bless you…You’ve showed him the way. JW’s aren’t the way forward. This was fate. Hope that man is well.

We also believe that Jesus appears many times in the old testament in various places and under various names or descriptions. Michael is one of them to some people, just like melchizedek, angel of the Lord etc.

So Jesus got his perfect saint human life back? So Jesus didn't sacrify his perfect human life for us and we have no salvation?

Thank you Brother for your amazing work in preaching the Gospel to everybody from Athiests to JWs to Muslims. Truly filled with the Holy Spirit! We all need to support your ministry wholeheartedly!

Onward Christian Soldiers 🙏 ✝️ 🕊

Thank you for allowing God to use you to save him.
❤

This is awesome brother and not by accident

Please don't out bible in back pocket your jeans

You should only be reading the King James Bible not the nkjv. The nkjv has many parts where the translation is much more archaic than the trusty kjv. Not to mention all the lies and twists the nkjv inserts. Study textural criticism

So... instead of becoming a JW cult member, you convinced him to join the biggest religion of Lawlessness that ever existed.
well done :/

God is good all time and he is the only way ✝️🩸

tell your camera person to go easy on that gum lol, that chewing is a bit much

Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27

WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL

THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE

From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) – Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 – MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5

Jesus in FACT mentioned the FATHER IS GREATER than I am. JOhn 14:28. BEFORE he WAS SENT, the Father is ALSO GREATER than Jesus.
Most truly I say to you, a slave is not greater than his master, nor is one who is sent greater than the one who sent him.q John 13:16 . Jesus was SENT BY GOD - and called as SERVANT OF GOD. Acts 4:27


AFTER his resurrection the FATHER IS STILL GREATER than Jesus - WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL

Glory to God!!!🎉

“From the Jehovah’s Witness Satantic Bible”
😂 so true

🙏❤️🙏

Looks like you pulled another stick out of the fire 🔥. If he’s a lonely old man the JW will give him companionship along with their false Gospel. Pray that he understands who Jesus really is. He’s not the ArcAngel Michael. He’s God!

God bless you for correcting this man

Thank you for what you are doing!!!! God bless your ministry and this man. You need a mic that allows the background sounds to be dampened and your voice to be clearer.

I read a Hebrew Bible 🎉
In 2017, I was about to drive head-on with an 18 wheeler, after I going to church for over 50 years, because I was still living as a complete hypocrite! Then I found out that it Only takes 1 DAY to Listen to the New Testament Bible, and I instantly repented of 151 willful sins, like: anger, bitterness, complaining, cursing, debt, depression, doubts, drugs, fear, gossip, insecurities, jealousy, LAWlessness, lying, materialism, pagan holidays, porn, pride, promiscuity, rebellion, religion, suicidal thoughts and attempts, unforgiveness, vanity, victim mentality, worry, etc... I stopped wasting my time going to church 3X a week=10-12hrs. Instead, I spent all that time reading Matt-Rev every single month for 5 years. ~ But since ALL Scripture is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, I was so convicted when I realized that my entire Audio Bible on DVD was exactly 72 hours:
72÷30=2.4hrs! !
10% of our TIME is far more valuable than 10% of our $$, especially when a Million, Billion, Trillion years is only the beginning of Eternity for Lukewarm believers, who think it's impossible to live Righteously. But Yeshua said: Go and sin NO more: Not less! Paul explained HOW: I simply stop for 10-20-30 Seconds To Take Every Thought Captive & I Make it Obedient to The Messiah! I simply ask myself: "Will this thought, word, deed glorify Satan or Elohim? Those who have been forgiven Much, ❤️ Much! So, ever since June of 2023, I've given most of my Time to reading the entire Hebrew Bible 1-2X every month. Anyone who doesn't want to spend most of their time with Yeshua now, will not be forced to spend all of Eternity with Him...
Nobody wants to hear: "I never knew you", but Many Christians are so busy like Martha, with their "Religious activities" like: going to church 2-3hr, bible studies 1-2hr serving 3-4hr, missions 1-2 wks, teaching 1-2hr, choir 1hr, community groups 2hrs, fellowship 2-5hrs, etc... it's All Filthy Rags, because they don't have any extra Time to sit at His feet for hours like Mary.
Everyone can push play and Listen to the Audio Bible, while they are getting ready, driving, shopping, cooking, eating, cleaning, exercising, walking the dog, taking a bath, tossing and turning at night, etc... But frankly, most people would rather spend hours scrolling through their phone!
He is the same yesterday, today and forever, so He does not change... The original Covenant was Renewed. He only doing away with the Temple, the High priest, Sacrificing animals, and stoning people caught in sin. The rest of The 613 all fall under 1 or more of the 10+2 Commands.
Yeshua said: Teach them to Obey Everything that I have Commanded. "IF" you ❤️ Me, Obey My Commandments. Yet most Christians can't even obey 3-4! So whoever truly ❤️ Him with ALL of their heart, mind, soul and strength, they will be able to stay on the Narrow Path, and refuse to do anything that the World is doing. The very first warning about the end times was: Do not be deceived! Elohim specifically said that we Must Remeber the Sabbath, because He knew that it would be changed to Sun-Day by the Roman Catholic church. The 24 Hour Sabbath is from Friday at sundown - Saturday at sundown.
Yeshua was always Hebrew, so don't blaspheme His name by calling him Jesus, Gor, spirit, etc.
We are Never eat an unclean animal like pork and shellfish: they are only here to clean the earth! Never celebrate Pagan Holidays like: Valentine's Day, Easter, Halloween, Thanksgiving, and Xmas which all have blatant Pagan origins, and steeped in sins: covetousness, greed, debt, etc.
False believers Refuse to celebrate the 7 High Biblical Feasts that are Eternal...
Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith - test yourselves. Or do you not know that Yeshua is in you unless, of course, you have failed the test.

Your in san antonio? Go have a dialog with the hebrew israelites, i think their by ripleys believe it or not in downtown

I'm so thankful the Lord revealed this man to you and the you obeyed the Spirit and planted a seed of truth!

The nkjv is just as bad as the nwt, full or error.all modern translations are false, if only people would stick with the kjv, but they would rather listen to nonsense, o it’s much easier to read, there taken from better manuscripts lies lies lies, if the modern translations were taken from better manuscripts, why is there nothing new in there, in fact there is less in them, also they are riddled with errors, kjv is Gods word for us today still, modern translations are of the devil.

ExJW here and now a follower of Jesus. Thank you for helping save this mans soul!

✌️😂😂😂😂😂Jehovah's witness satanic bible. 2 good.

Jehovah's Witnesses are the true worshippers of YHWH