Комментарии:
Ralph is 100% on ND to cover. Thanks Joe and WT for this vid!
ОтветитьAt Texas AM, AT USC, ranked Louisville, GT (Who should have beat Georgia), ranked Army, Ranked Navy and FSU (How is it ND's fault they fell off a cliff). Wouldn't consider that a weak schedule. But thats the typical narrative by the talking heads...
ОтветитьHalf of B10 do not have winning record, but committee says they have 3 of top 6? Committee is a FRAUD! No SOS or SOR used! SEC MUST leave CFP! SEC Championship Playoff! B10 brought PAC cupcakes and refuse to use SOS or SOR!
ОтветитьThe side is completely untouchable to me because I project Notre Dame -7.5. I played the 1H under 26.5
ОтветитьRoarke over 198.5 passing
ОтветитьDo better than the soup can and string audio......
ОтветитьIt is interesting how people look at the same set of facts and come to opposite conclusions... ralph is railing about the lack of good rushing attacks that Indiana faced but when they faced Ohio State they have up 115 yards total rushing on 29 attempts and for the game, they only gave up slightly over 300 yards to Ohio State TOTAL OFFENSE ... against the only truly balanced attach Notre Dame faced over the last 10 games, ie, USC, Notre Dame allowed just short of 200 yards rushing ... ND has faced a patsy schedule just like Indiana and they are being given far too much credit for shutting down Army and Navy whose lineman are outweidght massively by the ND D line ... GO HOOSIERS !
ОтветитьHow can you talk crap about Indianas schedule when notre dame has played nobody and lost to NIU?
ОтветитьOK. For the 10,356th time. Pay attention, I’m not gonna say this again. It’s not who you play. It’s how badly you beat who you play. And for most of the year Indiana led the country in this category. If they were winning by a field goal or a touchdown, then it might have some credence. But they weren’t. They were beating teams by 30, 40, 50 points. Try to overcome your bias.
ОтветитьWrong
Ответить