Machine Gun Comparison -- U.S. .30 caliber vs. German MG-34 and MG-42

Machine Gun Comparison -- U.S. .30 caliber vs. German MG-34 and MG-42

OkraJoe

12 лет назад

63,059 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@trap3400
@trap3400 - 09.02.2020 00:52

Zis is zo wrong!

Ответить
@Final-Boss-Crusher
@Final-Boss-Crusher - 20.02.2020 18:46

real americans heroes used a bow with arrows... 😂

Ответить
@Nclake5485
@Nclake5485 - 29.05.2020 05:54

Mg-42 the best machine gun in the world as long as you bring 6 extra barrels

Ответить
@davide8528
@davide8528 - 22.06.2020 15:45

Mg-42 the best!

Ответить
@Retronyx
@Retronyx - 12.09.2020 17:03

ya as if in the war you are shooting at one target lmao the mg42 can spray the entire platoon.

Ответить
@siler7
@siler7 - 14.09.2020 09:57

CEASE...

Ответить
@josephstalin6913
@josephstalin6913 - 30.10.2020 06:26

U don’t need accuracy when u got 2x the lead flying down range plus 8-9 mgs firing at the same time

Ответить
@ThatZenoGuy
@ThatZenoGuy - 20.11.2020 05:01

US propaganda, since the 30's to today!

Ответить
@matjes00007
@matjes00007 - 02.12.2020 06:37

When u order machine gunners by wish

Ответить
@maxyusha241
@maxyusha241 - 18.01.2021 23:46

Americans machine gun goes ratatatatatatatata
Mg42 goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Ответить
@manuels9747
@manuels9747 - 03.02.2021 18:22

Main requirements for a WWII machine gun:
- Speed
- Low weight
- Standard ammo (compatible with other guns, i.e. 7.92)
- Speed
- Speed
- (...)
- Speed

Useless requirements for a WWII machine gun:
- Accuracy.

Ответить
@luisleonardojuarez7389
@luisleonardojuarez7389 - 03.02.2021 21:52

Y yo creí que falsificar la firma de mis jefes era de lo más evidente.

Ответить
@chrsjennn8202
@chrsjennn8202 - 09.02.2021 18:32

M1919 Browning: drinks coffee MG42 and MG34:*wins*. light 30: sleeps without no noises

Ответить
@Armelier
@Armelier - 29.04.2021 05:53

Give me the MG42 and you will see how well i can dismember the enemys

Ответить
@jockeanus
@jockeanus - 08.05.2021 18:49

Love to see them compare tiger- sherman tanks, the heavy, big Canon tank can't hold aS many shells inside. Our's sHermans is better!

Ответить
@pawelsawicki1750
@pawelsawicki1750 - 30.06.2021 21:30

Since when a machine gun like that was supposed to be dead accurate? It's job, I imagine, was to suppress infantry, make enemy to crawl and scare the shit out of it. And I believe MG's have done the job much, much better, then any other counterpart gear at the time.
What German army lacked in manpower it compensated with a superior weaponry. MG's, MP40's, 88's, STG 44's (which basically was worldwide most famous AK47), and so on. German Luftwaffe was first army in the history to have jet fighters actually in service ( I believe almost 1500 ME-262 were built).
Last months of the war it was just and only race between USSR and USA, race to get to Berlin first and to steal as much technology, as much resources and as much scientists as possible.

Ответить
@wz1thoughtadjuster330
@wz1thoughtadjuster330 - 20.07.2021 22:40

Ahhhh liars, had to lie to their troops plus he says “the rate of fire eats up ammunition, “ ? And your troops lol

Ответить
@williamwest9204
@williamwest9204 - 25.07.2021 20:37

Propoganda to make the soldiers feel better. Mg42 is one of the finest weapons ever made

Ответить
@darknero1681
@darknero1681 - 30.07.2021 17:49

So 16 hits vs 24 hits but the German uses 3 times the ammo so therefore fires at a rate 3 times of that American counter part.
Therefore in the same amount of time 16 x 3 = 48 hits (90 fired) vs 24 hits (30 fired). This is if their test is accurate they were trying to make the MG look bad so may actually be more accurate then tested here. Conclusion is the MG has more bullets hitting the target in the same given time. The other assumption is that those 'missed' bullets didn't actually go on to hit another target.

Ответить
@mikeheinlein3746
@mikeheinlein3746 - 07.08.2021 11:39

The problem with american machine guns of that era was that they didn't go where you wanted them to go! They were not designed to be portable, lacked easily interchangeable barrels, and they weren't as light as the German MG's. There's a reason why america copied the German MGs and didn't further develop their own machine guns.

Ответить
@dutchthespitfire3204
@dutchthespitfire3204 - 04.09.2021 23:11

Virgin 50. Cal vs chad Mg42

Ответить
@LumocolorARTnr1319
@LumocolorARTnr1319 - 28.09.2021 20:23

They should have done as the British did when they first captured a fully working Tiger tank with over 200 shell marks on it, DON'T TELL ANYONE ABOUT THIS MACHINE! And invent new cannons for ALL our tanks quickly.

Ответить
@randomizerteleviewage307
@randomizerteleviewage307 - 09.11.2021 18:17

Watch this...

* clears throat *

BAR wins

Ответить
@JerryMetal
@JerryMetal - 06.12.2021 13:21

Looks like if you are two soldiers standing shoulder-to-shoulder, you will be riddled with bullets by any of these. So the difference between these guns is not that important is it?

Ответить
@SZU_airsoft
@SZU_airsoft - 13.12.2021 13:23

Nice, MG42 hits 16 times from a short and a long burst in 4 seconds against 5 controlled very short burst in 13 seconds hit 24 times.

Ответить
@lanlan2147
@lanlan2147 - 12.02.2022 06:34

Mg42 the best ever build

Ответить
@aramisjesus376
@aramisjesus376 - 13.03.2022 01:27

E.u hizo este tipo de propaganda para contrarrestar la fama infernal que tenía la mg42 diciendo que su ladrido era peor que su mordida. Pero en el campo de batalla los estadounidenses comprobaron que su mordida era tan devastadora como su ladrido

Ответить
@dab0331
@dab0331 - 15.04.2022 07:45

Yep. MG42's and 34's were great at holding chokepoints and avenues of approach because anyone who passed through them was almost certainly going to get hit the moment they popped their head out. But the M1919 was better at covering a [wide area] of fire and creating a wall of fire to prevent an advancing charge from coming through without having to reload right away and with less chance of overheating.

Ответить
@buraktepe6683
@buraktepe6683 - 21.06.2022 05:05

He shoot 42 continues. But American weapons' wait and shoot. Of course this kind of shoot better aim.

Ответить
@combtkid
@combtkid - 25.06.2022 15:47

I'm getting an MG42 ringtone LOL

Ответить
@mariogomes4812
@mariogomes4812 - 29.06.2022 22:31

Bullshit... the mg42 is superior.

Ответить
@ClevorBelmont
@ClevorBelmont - 25.08.2022 00:34

Man on the 42 looks like he’s ready for some pipe lol

Ответить
@joeguzman3558
@joeguzman3558 - 15.09.2022 17:59

I wonder why today's military machine guns are so fast Lol

Ответить
@louditalian1962
@louditalian1962 - 02.10.2022 04:34

This is pure propaganda lol. They made videos like this for the civilians to think they are superior. But the Americans on the ground who believed this crap were carried away on a body bag.

Ответить
@kurtreese7408
@kurtreese7408 - 27.02.2023 17:29

Good ole USA propaganda. And US soldiers in WWII haD poor fire discipline.

Ответить
@yahablyaa
@yahablyaa - 05.03.2023 18:31

MG-42 великолепен даже когда не стреляет

Ответить
@Willchannel90
@Willchannel90 - 17.03.2023 02:37

It acts like a Thompson Machine gun.

Ответить
@Korpiainen
@Korpiainen - 07.05.2023 19:06

Sure. Some idiot NATO allies still use that useless german MG instead of super accurate .30 cal Brownings.

Ответить
@GHOST01LE
@GHOST01LE - 11.05.2023 04:07

Wondering about they didn't add the 1919 stinger

Ответить
@frankhajek6349
@frankhajek6349 - 22.06.2023 03:14

Gee wiz…3 times the ammo… does that mean3 times the bullets flying at you? imagine if the Germans could aim or ask the Russians about it

Ответить
@Wolfgang192
@Wolfgang192 - 02.08.2023 23:29

Superior? so Tell Why M60 copy MG 42? Tell me.

Dont lie to us soldier, acuracy is for rifles.

Ответить
@philthrelfall5294
@philthrelfall5294 - 12.11.2023 12:09

Yes, this is propaganda, the point is valid. The MG42 had a kick like a mule & you only have to watch one firing (off the bipod) and it bucks up significantly. This is why they were trained to fire short bursts, from prone. It would have done a fine job in suppression, but ammo consumption and need for barrel changes, were disadvantages. It was not the war winning weapon that many make it out to be. Good, but not without drawbacks.

Ответить
@WBenzSEL
@WBenzSEL - 20.01.2024 12:10

Let’s be real - the 42 is an absolute ripsaw

Ответить
@flatheadgg2443
@flatheadgg2443 - 08.06.2024 13:38

Didn't know the americans still used water cooled guns in 1944

Ответить
@samuelphillips4258
@samuelphillips4258 - 21.06.2024 16:45

Is this real WW2 footage or video

Ответить
@cherryscarlett
@cherryscarlett - 16.07.2024 21:39

Ç∅πç£μ§¡∅π:: /₹Ə∆£ VVƏ∆¶∅π§ ∆/₹ə j≠VV¥/₹ /₹Ə∆£ §∅£Cl∆₺²Əπ. .
/¡j≠ μ ¶μ₺ §ll(¡π²¥ lo∅¥§, (V)vv¥cll•| j≠əəlo£ə ∆/₹(V)§, ₺∅ j≠¡/₹Ə /₹Ə∆£ VV∆j≠²Əπ. . /₹ƏÇ∅¡£ l≤VV¡££ §¶/₹∆¥ loμ£²Ə₺§, ∆££. ∅√Ə/₹. ClƏ. ¶£∆ÇƏ.
//lo£∆(V)Ə Clə §∅£Cl¡Ə/₹, j≠vv¥/₹ VVƏ∆ll( j≠/₹∆¡£ l•|∆πCl§. .

Ответить
@Trollsoul946
@Trollsoul946 - 26.07.2024 20:53

American bullshit is always better😂😂😂

Ответить
@darreneccles7770
@darreneccles7770 - 19.08.2024 05:36

D day changed their minds real quick

Ответить
@thomaslauer7287
@thomaslauer7287 - 22.08.2024 17:40

Next try the same aiming time each

Ответить