Some Stars Become Super Massive and We Finally Know How

Some Stars Become Super Massive and We Finally Know How

Anton Petrov

12 часов назад

46,549 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@achi-leanathlos8376
@achi-leanathlos8376 - 14.06.2025 09:59

Train-feed-rest and you will grow, universe is just a massive gym

Ответить
@Sanquinity
@Sanquinity - 14.06.2025 08:55

Honestly I wish your videos weren't so long-winded. Most videos are longer than needed to convey the information the titles alludes to.

Then again I do kinda understand. Since not everyone already has a lot of the base knowledge needed to fully understand what the actual new information means for science.

Ответить
@stlmopoet
@stlmopoet - 14.06.2025 07:33

I don't understand why the term "molecular cloud" is used. Everything is made of atoms/molecules.

Ответить
@digilyd
@digilyd - 14.06.2025 06:58

Do not overdo panazooming, it becomes a nuisance.

Ответить
@DanielStone-yw1rn
@DanielStone-yw1rn - 14.06.2025 06:49

When they were originally reading the sky did we have the same amount of stars or were they forming as they were watching

Ответить
@david94549
@david94549 - 14.06.2025 05:02

Anton sounds how i sound on MDMA and my jaw is rigid, i don't want it to be seen as a criticism, it's just an observation.

Ответить
@saull287
@saull287 - 14.06.2025 05:00

Maybe we can take some mass from the Sun and build something with it and not let it destroy the Solar System?

Ответить
@SciD1
@SciD1 - 14.06.2025 02:19

No, you only "think" you know.

Ответить
@DominicRyanOsborne
@DominicRyanOsborne - 14.06.2025 01:54

Tarantula is just Texas of the Universe

Ответить
@betterbuds
@betterbuds - 14.06.2025 01:48

So in simple terms 18 ish earths per day? That's insane growth

Ответить
@charlesjmouse
@charlesjmouse - 14.06.2025 01:15

Please never change, Anton.



I've just YTBlocked Astrum because it's just gotten far too clickbaity for me.

Ответить
@OnlyJalenPhd
@OnlyJalenPhd - 14.06.2025 00:50

This is so exciting!! What a time to be alive!

Ответить
@SashasMusicSpace
@SashasMusicSpace - 14.06.2025 00:06

I smoked a joint while wandering around the grounds of the Very Large Array in New Mexico.

Ответить
@animalbird9436
@animalbird9436 - 13.06.2025 23:33

When the gas gets to a certain point it starts to fuse and becomes a star..So all that gasin the accretion disc..how does it fall to the star,when surely the heat would destroy the gas molecules and the solarwind just pushes it away.
So how does it add mass when its already past the ignition faze.

Ответить
@xoslox3977
@xoslox3977 - 13.06.2025 23:02

Love your vids been subbed for a long time keep it up 👍🏻

Ответить
@blobrana8515
@blobrana8515 - 13.06.2025 21:01

"These cows are small, but those cows are far away . . . "

Ответить
@Apeiron242
@Apeiron242 - 13.06.2025 20:55

Masses in mass.

Ответить
@HighSEAL
@HighSEAL - 13.06.2025 20:52

Basically Main stream model is fake AF

Ответить
@YULspotter
@YULspotter - 13.06.2025 20:39

Wow this is very interesting. I also wonder if this efficient feeding of gas from the accretion disk to the proto star, means that the system may not form any planets at all.

Ответить
@herohamza1196
@herohamza1196 - 13.06.2025 19:51

You know what else is Hotter/Brighter

Ответить
@abavariannormiepleb9470
@abavariannormiepleb9470 - 13.06.2025 19:49

With all the talk about ammonia I was wondering if my cat litter box also had an observable red and blue shift - but my detectors could only find yellow and brown shift phenomena with ammonia mostly being present in yellow shifted areas ;-l

Ответить
@danield2685
@danield2685 - 13.06.2025 19:48

The simulations are amazing 🤩

Ответить
@JohnDoe-x2d9s
@JohnDoe-x2d9s - 13.06.2025 19:10

At 200 solar masses I wonder how short a life such a massive star would have.

Ответить
@andycordy5190
@andycordy5190 - 13.06.2025 18:59

I thought there were limits placed on the size of stars based on physical laws🤔

Ответить
@jakethornton4856
@jakethornton4856 - 13.06.2025 18:57

Tbh this is pretty much how I thought it happened but I figured that it was prolly based on what elements were in the cloud that was forming the star. I figured that stars formed from certain elements wud never develop planets because they wernt elements that would form planets and that since no planets formed it wud be easier for the star to keep the cloud in a rotating disk that wud constantly inch closer to the star so it cud continue to feed until it was huge, especially if the cloud contained elements that allowed the cloud to easily outpace the energy consumed by the star

Ответить
@Jason1975ism
@Jason1975ism - 13.06.2025 18:53

Nonstop breakthroughs and inconsistencies are a strong sign of a young science. It's not a bad thing to be wrong. It's simply an answer that requires one to be unbiased and open minded. Natural measurements take precedence over arbitrary ones. In other words, massive stars exist because they do. Understanding isn't required. The universe exists because it does. Be grateful to be a part of it.

Ответить
@CeeTee-12345
@CeeTee-12345 - 13.06.2025 18:42

So the star is young and has big jets, we got it Anton!!

Ответить
@VoidOperator
@VoidOperator - 13.06.2025 18:35

TiL: Massive stars get massive by absorbing mass

Ответить
@DougieJohnson-l5w
@DougieJohnson-l5w - 13.06.2025 17:57

from a lower dimension humons probably look same as that,, constantly streaming golden showers randomly everywhere followed by sphincter holes emitting gas everywhere else!

Ответить
@DougieJohnson-l5w
@DougieJohnson-l5w - 13.06.2025 17:51

who is gettin' billed for all that gas? spinning, flowing, jetting & yellow streams? er one hell of a golden shower

Ответить
@AaronWolfenbarger
@AaronWolfenbarger - 13.06.2025 17:35

Ya the whole it gets pushed away at least you said SHOULD but since you believe everything is driven by gravity even though the electromagnetic force is MANY magnitudes greater than gravity you way of looking at it is incomplete and again its because you cannot explain things that way because then youd have to admit an arbitrary influence that is to say GOD!

Ответить
@AaronWolfenbarger
@AaronWolfenbarger - 13.06.2025 17:32

Ya thats God saying "youre stupid and I am holding you in derision"

Ответить
@AaronWolfenbarger
@AaronWolfenbarger - 13.06.2025 17:31

it hillarious for them to take pictures and call it a stellar nursery when they havent proven at all that those stars were recently "born" seeing how stars with lots of stellar gasses to feed upon will remain younger and young appearing but they dont mention that at all as even a possibility because again GOD! Youre a bunch of idiots banging your heads against God and its friggin hillarious!

Ответить
@AaronWolfenbarger
@AaronWolfenbarger - 13.06.2025 17:29

NO! We are NOT observing the formation of different types of stars youre running a simulation based upon something that isnt true or factual. That you would or could say thats what we are looking at demonstrates a kind of insanity, a break from reality.

Ответить
@AaronWolfenbarger
@AaronWolfenbarger - 13.06.2025 17:27

The fact of the matter is they made a model and its a lie a self deception based on a hatred and denial of the God head because for men and women like yourself God holding you accountable is unacceptable but the fact remains that God must hold you accountable to him because he cant stop being God.

Ответить
@AaronWolfenbarger
@AaronWolfenbarger - 13.06.2025 17:25

Stars dont spontaneously create themselves out of dust and gasses dude!

Ответить
@AisleEpe-oz8kf
@AisleEpe-oz8kf - 13.06.2025 17:23

Looks capable of explaining early massive blackholes, perhaps. A continuous accretion disc through massive stars to direct collapse. thanks

Ответить
@gulfstream32
@gulfstream32 - 13.06.2025 17:18

How to become a Megastar⭐️

Ответить
@thomasgeorgecastleberry6918
@thomasgeorgecastleberry6918 - 13.06.2025 16:18

Disney promoted tiny stars, with his immortal song, "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star."

Ответить
@upontheroof
@upontheroof - 13.06.2025 15:36

With all this energy in the universe, how come my utility bills are so high?

Ответить
@holysecret2
@holysecret2 - 13.06.2025 15:10

At first I thought the thumbnail showed a giant eagle's head

Ответить
@axle.student
@axle.student - 13.06.2025 14:35

Nice, Gravity vs anti-gravity (spin). Or gravity vs centrifugal...
>
Big stars that don't implode and go bang :P

Ответить
@lucidd4103
@lucidd4103 - 13.06.2025 14:22

one more jewel, thank you anton

Ответить
@vaakdemandante8772
@vaakdemandante8772 - 13.06.2025 13:24

Again, what is the magnetic landscape around the star? If the star produces radiation that pushes the dust away, but the local magnetic filament feeds the star new material in copious amounts then the star will grow regardless.

Stars grow due to magnetism first and gravitation second. Magnetism is 40 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity. When will that sink in in the scientific community?

IMHO as the times goes on the academic research feels more and more like a joke.

Ответить
@weicco
@weicco - 13.06.2025 13:13

So there's gas that smells bad spinning around a star and the star is feeding on that. But that's almost how I got so big! I just don't eat the gas. I release it.

Ответить
@ClosestNearUtopia
@ClosestNearUtopia - 13.06.2025 12:56

Ahhh so it was possible all along now!? Scientist🤦🫠🧀

Ответить
@ataaamic6321
@ataaamic6321 - 13.06.2025 12:54

Fascinating stuff! I wonder how this will affect our calculations of pop III stars and their average masses. Very very cool, I wonder what initiates such an accretion disk because it can't just be mass or density but it must be able to remain stable somehow... very very cool stuff! Can't wait to see what comes out of this

Ответить
@yvonnemiezis5199
@yvonnemiezis5199 - 13.06.2025 12:46

Great video, very interesting information and discoveries, beautiful pctures,thanks❤👍

Ответить