Orbital Velocity Explained

Orbital Velocity Explained

PhysicsHigh

8 лет назад

39,129 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@craigrussell4105
@craigrussell4105 - 28.11.2016 13:01

i feel dizzy

Ответить
@AtharvaGulhane
@AtharvaGulhane - 10.02.2017 07:24

Nice work it helped me a lot

Ответить
@ashwaryagupta7168
@ashwaryagupta7168 - 11.05.2017 15:45

very helpful

Ответить
@awfaihfpiawjfp
@awfaihfpiawjfp - 20.06.2017 11:56

your videos are sooo helpful man

Ответить
@sujasaju5793
@sujasaju5793 - 07.11.2017 16:42

helpful

Ответить
@australianjuniorscience9672
@australianjuniorscience9672 - 13.11.2017 07:24

Thanks great channel

Ответить
@srujankumart.n9377
@srujankumart.n9377 - 03.03.2018 09:16

how the cetripetal force actimy on the satellite or body

Ответить
@julialawless7094
@julialawless7094 - 30.03.2018 02:38

Why is the GPE negative?

Ответить
@wernerboden239
@wernerboden239 - 12.04.2019 04:17

It does seem a bit counter intuitive though.
I understand that orbital velocity would be slower at greater distance.
However, in order for a satellite in orbit, to increase it's distance from earth,
it seems, that it would need to increase orbital velocity.
Or maybe, that would only result in an eliptic orbit...
Would it simply need to point it's thrusters towards earth, and slightly tilted forwards,
in such direction, that it would move to higher orbit, as well as slow down ?

Ответить
@glenncaldwell344
@glenncaldwell344 - 31.07.2019 15:48

Hi, can you calculate the net gravity being felt by an astronaut in the ISS..? taking into account an approximate 90% G + the change in direction due to the movement around the curve.

Ответить
@varuno7560
@varuno7560 - 08.09.2019 17:12

In my book, this equation is further exceed by Putting G= gR^2/M which I don't understand. It again exceeded by V= √gR^2/m.r ×M. Then V= R√g/R+h .

Ответить
@flatearthanswers
@flatearthanswers - 22.10.2019 05:22

Can you show us a REAL example of a ball spinning, wobbling, and rotating around a larger ball that's dragging 9 other balls around at different speeds and rotations traveling through a near perfect vacuum, year after year right to the millisecond?

Not a cartoon version like yours though

Ответить
@kouso4413
@kouso4413 - 28.04.2020 18:53

PUTISIMO AMO, ERES UN CRACK UN FIERA UN MASTODONTE, NUMERO UNO, LOCOMOTORA, MONSTRUO, TITAN, GIGANTE

Ответить
@JohnMaffina
@JohnMaffina - 30.05.2020 08:17

i knew that!!!!!!

Ответить
@liljons6753
@liljons6753 - 29.07.2020 00:31

Who determined north from south? Why siuth cant be north? What is up ? What is down.....?

Ответить
@boptah7489
@boptah7489 - 05.09.2020 00:07

absolute nonsense. there is no such thing as "orbital velocity" and the initial tangent when you release an object changes immediately the gravitational pull is sustained. ie the initial tangent only applies initially. and not continually.

Ответить
@Kagankagan1984
@Kagankagan1984 - 24.04.2021 15:13

Gravity is not a force, you are explaining it with newtonian physics, you should consider about general relativity rules.

Ответить
@moniquekeating5840
@moniquekeating5840 - 22.08.2021 05:44

this made no sense sorry

Ответить
@Nixontheman
@Nixontheman - 11.09.2021 22:58

Is it revolving rather than rotating?

Ответить
@leopardtiger1022
@leopardtiger1022 - 03.10.2021 18:11

Excellent. Clear logical.

Ответить
@leopardtiger1022
@leopardtiger1022 - 03.10.2021 18:19

What I like is trampoline is no where in this game. It is our old Newton science in practical application.

Ответить
@First.Last.99
@First.Last.99 - 25.10.2021 22:29

My questions is why we even get a specific radius between planets. In other words why is Earth 4th planet and Neptun last and Saturn 6th from sun ??

Ответить
@VortekStarling
@VortekStarling - 05.01.2022 15:42

Here's the weird thing though. The moon orbits the earth with no force input at all, just pure inertia. If gravity is trying to pull it toward the earth, like an elastic, why does it not require rockets or something to make it speed up every time the elastic of gravity tries to pull it down and increase its RPM like a figure skater makes themselves spin faster? The moon would still be going the same speed but getting closer and closer to the earth until it collided. It doesn't make sense that it can resist that happening without any power source.

Ответить
@eddybrevet6816
@eddybrevet6816 - 02.04.2022 14:01

A wheel, orbiting earth, also spinning at near or orbit velocity?

Ответить
@Shamanhealer111
@Shamanhealer111 - 10.10.2022 10:23

Your formula is badly flawed. This formula was used for satellites in low earth orbit like the space station where the mass of the satellite is negligent as compared to the earth. It's a short cut formula. But this Formula has been brainwashed onto you as a correct formula for the moon tangent force. It is not. When you work out the formula using the moon and earth's mass the answer is 28,000 mph! You can see why they eliminate the mass of the moon because the speed of the moon is less than 3,000 mph. Space station needs to go 18,000 but the moon 3,000. No, something is very wrong. 28,000 mph yes that seems right. This is hidden because it 100% disproves cosmology as we are told. I am shock how millions of professionals have absolutely no ability to think for yourselves. You just repeat a lie your were taught!!! They use you for brain washing propaganda. But it proves just how easily a ball earth is brain washed in the professional sector. I'm going to give you 100% scientific way to know you are on a level earth. The horizon is at eye level always. At 37,000 feet the horizon at 280 miles out would have to be 34,000 feet lower. It can not be at eye level.
You would have to look down to see the earth horizon but it remains at eye level.
Think about this. You have been lied to! You seem like a nice person; wake up and re-educate yourself. I am giving you a gift of your life because everything is a lie. Please be educated enough to understand space pantomime. There is not one real picture of earth from space. Just think about your simplistic drawing of how the earth is also wobbling in a small orbit and add in the sun and other planets and think about the moon spinning so that it faces the earth perfectly forever. Tidal Lock is impossible. Apolo lunar lander showed a earth rise from the moon. You know that is impossible!!! Proving that apolo moon landings were all faked.
Low earth orbit is all we have done. The earth is most likely very large, and may be infinity large. Our sun is 3,000 milea away. A right triangle is all it takes to verify this fact.
And now look at a time laps to verify with your own eyes. Notice the sun is curving verifying it is traveling in a circle above earth as is the moon. When the sun passes the moon this explains the shadow west to east across the USA. These are all 100% scientific evidence. Re educate yourself and live in the light. Truth, knowledge and love...

Ответить
@ananyasingh5409
@ananyasingh5409 - 19.11.2022 05:43

Please answer!
1) Why doesn't Moon falls in Earth due to constant gravitational force?
2) Why we equal Gravitational force & Centripetal force?

Ответить
@unclvinny
@unclvinny - 13.06.2023 00:45

The thing I don’t understand about this is that it seems like the moon could weigh twice as much and still orbit at the same radius and speed. But apparently astrophysicists can use radius and speed of exoplanets to determine planetary mass?

Ответить
@20becky35
@20becky35 - 18.08.2023 08:03

thank you love you

Ответить
@nsdEditz
@nsdEditz - 05.08.2024 21:33

Nice❤

Ответить