Quantum Computing: Top Players 2021

Quantum Computing: Top Players 2021

Sabine Hossenfelder

3 года назад

323,361 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@wric01
@wric01 - 17.11.2021 19:10

No actual app to take advantage of it's superior computing.

Ответить
@lukebrennan5780
@lukebrennan5780 - 19.11.2021 04:26

this was amusing. All these physicists.. all finding that they are failing. Could/might/maybe in every direction.

Ответить
@sku32956
@sku32956 - 19.11.2021 15:40

I would guess a good chunk of these companies will not last choose carefully .

Ответить
@multipointus
@multipointus - 20.11.2021 17:35

The 1 000 000 qubit requirement has been debunked since this video came out. Also low temperature aren't required for uon trapping.

Ответить
@ichigokurosaki2838
@ichigokurosaki2838 - 21.11.2021 15:54

Can you do a video on the 'Fusion-Based Quantum Computation' paper?

Ответить
@davidlowe8597
@davidlowe8597 - 24.11.2021 05:08

Quote from Goldman Sachs "There is a high level of uncertainty around widespread adoption" of quantum computing ⚛️🤣😆😂

Ответить
@williambudd2850
@williambudd2850 - 25.11.2021 07:44

She claims it is an emerging technology dispiotee thee fact thaat virtually nothing has emerged. That should be your first clue that she is full of bull.

Ответить
@EvGamerBETA
@EvGamerBETA - 25.11.2021 21:44

Would it be easier to mantain low temperatures required for quantum computers in space or vacuum, or it will only cause complication with cooling of conventional circutry?

Ответить
@tolkienfan1972
@tolkienfan1972 - 01.12.2021 21:25

If the atoms in ion traps are missing electrons, wouldn't they have a positive charge?

Ответить
@Practicalinvestments
@Practicalinvestments - 12.12.2021 07:25

Lmao didn’t you make a video saying “dont fall for the hype”? I knew this technogy was close to being commercialized and im glad I didn’t listen cause I made a 30% profit off of quantum computing already in that 6 month time period

Ответить
@juanrobles9309
@juanrobles9309 - 17.12.2021 01:43

Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity is wrong. There are several evidences that demonstrate this:
1. Albert Einstein hypothesis: nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Evidence: based on astronomical observations demonstrate some galaxies move faster than the speed of light.
2. Albert Einstein's hypothesis: the photon has zero mass so it can travel at the speed of light. Evidence: a photon is deflected by the gravitational field of a black hole, the sun or any planet, so it can be concluded that the photon behaves like any other object with mass.
3. Albert Einstein's hypothesis: the photon has zero mass so it has no inertia and cannot produce heat when it hits another object. Evidence: when a photon collides with a surface, it exerts a force of mv2/2, for this reason your body heats up when exposed to the sun.

Ответить
@espenbgh2540
@espenbgh2540 - 19.12.2021 14:14

Quantum computing - the holy grail of computing, or the scientific self-deception of them all. - The superior computing power over them all, the transition from sequential computing to parallel computing, but is it so true? Is not the world sequential after all. I was not born at the same time as my mother, so I would not be her son, but her brother. The evolution of life has always happened sequentially.Not only with parallel computing - sounded the wise words of the knowledge creator, but certainly if not also the promises of multi-parallel computing, - several tasks at once! A dream, but not a reality. Nor a general quantum computer - every man owns.Then there is the operationality of the quantum computers, the "programs" and not least the error corrections that are needed to achieve a result, based on which coincidences - that come into play and must be corrected, using probability - for where the error is in the result. Probability is used in the statistics when, for example. throws 100 coins in the air and will see how many land on heads or tale. - It's Probability! Well then let's say that 25% of the coins that show heads are wrong - so we do not count them, then we have the right result! - That is ridiculous.

Ответить
@mauroylospichiruchis544
@mauroylospichiruchis544 - 20.12.2021 22:55

Sabine was quite optimistic and almost non ironical in this video. Am I in a parallel universe?

Ответить
@LePedant
@LePedant - 23.12.2021 11:29

Wait, Honeywell has a Quantum Computer??? I thought they just made space heaters.

Ответить
@EddieVBlueIsland
@EddieVBlueIsland - 25.12.2021 00:06

It was VonNeuman dream (and assumption) that computers can replace real experiments - with no proof or even a thought that it could work.

Ответить
@usingThaForce
@usingThaForce - 02.01.2022 08:24

Should have been Marcus Garvey on her shirt but hey potato, zapthnath maranahem (reserved for destruction)

Ответить
@cyrusvalkonen3665
@cyrusvalkonen3665 - 21.01.2022 16:37

Would you create an Onlyfans channel, where you talk more advanced physics?

Ответить
@Radio12315
@Radio12315 - 25.01.2022 03:17

From a formal point of view, extended fuzzy logic, in Pythagorean, intuitionist and neutral sets, covers any quantum computing, in extensive form.

Ответить
@salvatoreshiggerino6810
@salvatoreshiggerino6810 - 04.02.2022 12:06

Quantum supremacy? Sounds like they need to come up with a fourteen-word slogan for that.

Ответить
@nightmisterio
@nightmisterio - 08.02.2022 10:56

If it takes more actions to get 1 number they can never be faster, I see a gimmick to pump stock while using specialized cores and AI to solve certain problems faster, also they need a excuse to use the backdoor in encryption of the NSA used in bitcoin.

Ответить
@franciscolobo8240
@franciscolobo8240 - 14.02.2022 19:26

Can you post in your description interesting articles as the ones you have read on the topic? Thank you!

Ответить
@cmvamerica9011
@cmvamerica9011 - 02.03.2022 02:22

It’s not happening.

Ответить
@neilzambrano6496
@neilzambrano6496 - 10.03.2022 21:29

You already demystified quantum entanglement,do'es it mean quantum computer's only selling point is it's super conductivity compared to present computers?

Ответить
@foopadr9076
@foopadr9076 - 21.03.2022 15:57

nah, its a new way for companies to fk people over

Ответить
@marcelinogalicia7612
@marcelinogalicia7612 - 06.04.2022 18:47

Sabine can any of these quantum computers be accessed by voice command? Or asked questions?

Ответить
@radinelaj3932
@radinelaj3932 - 18.04.2022 16:07

Need a computer which think, which feels emotions, a computer which produce apps like man . what is man ? Is a machine who produce apps( applications) ,that would be an attainment

Ответить
@BillHimmel
@BillHimmel - 21.04.2022 12:59

Is quantum computing as well „confirmed“ as „Dark Matter“? Given that all existing Quantum Computers have ordinary computers attached to them, I don‘t see any real proof that these things really work!

Ответить
@BillHimmel
@BillHimmel - 21.04.2022 17:12

Hei Sabine: Here is my „challenge“: Quantum Computers are‘nt based on Quantum Theory, but only of our interpretation of it. To explain it as simple as possible: Quantum Theory predicts the „Double slit-experiment“ and is well coroborated in this. Now one can assume that the photon flies through both slits at once (or that that cat is alive and dead at the same time!) and based on this assumption, quantum computers would be more efficent, because a qbit would be in both states 1 and 0 at once. But nobody knows wether this interpretation is correct, right? All we know in the end is that the cat is alive OR dead when we open the box and that there is an interference pattern behind the double-slit. So Quantum Computers are probably a hoax and their results are due to the ordinary computers attached to them. What do you make of this?

Ответить
@alexcarter1291
@alexcarter1291 - 07.05.2022 23:02

Thank you very much for this concise and clear overview

Ответить
@clydeblair9622
@clydeblair9622 - 16.05.2022 06:08

Repeat. You're so cute.

Ответить
@andreif7992
@andreif7992 - 17.05.2022 06:18

Didn't she say that wormholes don't exist in her another video?

Ответить
@4toes1nose
@4toes1nose - 19.05.2022 03:59

Thank you

Ответить
@rayoflight62
@rayoflight62 - 27.05.2022 20:16

While the idea of a quantum entangled computer "has a lot of potential", the shortcomings are severe. I refer to the technology used in the transducers, which is suboptimal at best. The lack of definition of the measurements are startling. A current quantum computer is the equivalent of the Moon rocket envisioned by Jules Verne, powered by a charge of gunpowder. We need a totally new class of sensors and transducers before a quantum computer can have any potential application. A well designed analogue computer, without any new technology, could outclass any quantum computer of the current days.
In my opinion, even the best state of the art quantum computer is a money spinner and public relation booster; but I see quantum computers on the same level of muon-catalysed cold fusion, which also "has a lot of potential".
Thank you for the video Dr. Hossenfelder, which I greatly appreciated...

Ответить
@DrinkingStar
@DrinkingStar - 31.05.2022 01:23

I hope you update this topic. I have looking at several of the companies in which to invest that you have mentioned.
P.S. Your videos are extremely fascinating and easy to understand. Thanks.

Ответить
@SameAsAnyOtherStranger
@SameAsAnyOtherStranger - 04.07.2022 19:17

Super computer geek 1- "Well, we're bumping up against the atomic size limits of electronic transistors. What are going to do now?

Super computer geek 2- "I don't know. Maybe we could create a bug free programming language."

Super computer geek 1- "Nah. Let's use quantum mechanics to do anything it could possibly do that could be called computing."

Ответить
@poksnee
@poksnee - 18.08.2022 01:22

Interesting use of the word ion and the phrase eye on.

Ответить
@ranevc
@ranevc - 11.09.2022 11:20

I want to order a quantum computing laptop.

Ответить
@TheEarthsEyes
@TheEarthsEyes - 14.10.2022 04:17

Any thoughts on the Rydberg atom based QCs?

Ответить
@gmxmatei
@gmxmatei - 15.10.2022 04:30

Instead of talking about ghosts, we could discuss about Universal Software Model -- a future Nobel Prize!

Ответить
@NickRoman
@NickRoman - 11.12.2022 11:07

I think there is a world market for maybe 5 quantum computers, once they start really working. (yes, that is a kind of joke for those who get it)

Ответить
@andymiron7941
@andymiron7941 - 19.12.2022 12:59

Will be fun to see the Quantum Computer Bubble burst. :D

Ответить
@IbrahimAkar1985
@IbrahimAkar1985 - 24.02.2023 04:42

I don’t think quantum computers will beam us but it will calculate the location to where to land us fast.

Ответить
@Theineluctable_SOME_CANT
@Theineluctable_SOME_CANT - 20.03.2023 05:07

Wow...


Ion traps: an atom missing a few e- so have a NEGATIVE CHARGE?!

Very rare for Sabine to make an error.

Ответить
@Theineluctable_SOME_CANT
@Theineluctable_SOME_CANT - 20.03.2023 05:08

Love the t shirt!

Ответить
@dunengazelle689
@dunengazelle689 - 04.04.2023 09:51

Would you recommend learning quantum computing as a software developer?

Ответить
@BrianPowell-tq9pr
@BrianPowell-tq9pr - 30.10.2023 21:43

Sab we are intelgled I need you

Ответить
@jeffreyedwards767
@jeffreyedwards767 - 07.01.2024 02:08

🔥 = bad

Ответить
@SarahClark-q9c
@SarahClark-q9c - 25.11.2024 20:36

I bought a few hundred USDT from a friend, and he gave me a string of code e95295df4634a8e08e2a505b89339757ccebc4ea5e87b567140dc9aa09530f83. What does it mean? How do I transfer it to OKX?

Ответить
@CAThompson
@CAThompson - 15.05.2021 15:22

I'd been keeping an eye-on quantum computing (nice pun there) but got tired of seeing all the puffery in the news on it. This video is a great update on actual progress.

Ответить