Комментарии:
its called a battleship, a cruiser, a destroyer and a ship of the line
mhhhhh
Why does that warship design reminds me of ironclad?
ОтветитьTaliban run
ОтветитьIts actually junk an look where it is now just another example of $ laundering !
ОтветитьGod that’s an ugly ship
ОтветитьIts so ugly smh. Modern warships are Dogwater.
ОтветитьCapitan Kirk?
ОтветитьI know this video is five years old now but watching this vid and reading some of the comments made me realize something. Why isn't the US Navy re-naming these things to Guided Missile Cruisers (CG) and re-starting production with the now-totally-useless front gun turrets replaced with more VLS cells? The Ticos are not only way too old...but they are actively being decommissioned and scrapped as we speak because of their age. And not only are they being scrapped, but a replacement Cruiser program HASN'T EVEN BEEN STARTED YET!!! We are decommissioning and scrapping the Ticos without any replacement available now or in the near future, and the Navy claims that Arleigh-Burkes can't simply take over the mission that the Ticos perform in a Carrier Strike Group. So why not do exactly what I just suggested?
It was all of the cutting-edge tech and the reduction in procurement numbers that drove the price of these things to ridiculous levels and got the program cancelled. But today all of that tech is far more mature than it was when the Zumwalt program started. Moreover, now that we KNOW the front guns are literally useless chunks of wasted steel, they can be removed from the plans and the front of the ship can be redesigned to carry even more VLS cells and a conventional 5" gun in a stealthy mount for protection from small surface vessels. How is this not the perfect solution? Instead of starting a new CG development program from scratch, we are simply re-starting Zumwalt production with a new classification (CGs instead of DDGs) and a new mission set.
One of the reasons why the Arleigh-Burkes supposedly can't take over the Tico's mission is a lack of space onboard the DDGs. Well, as this video shows, the Zumwalts have TONS of room on board. I'm sure I'm not the first person to think of doing this so why hasn't it gotten more traction in Congress and in the Navy? I've never heard of ANY discussions...even tentative ones...to convert the Zumwalts to Cruisers and restart production immediately in order to replace the aging, dilapidated Ticos. It seems like the damn perfect solution to me.
Doing so would not only fix the problem of a lack of Cruisers, but it will totally change the narrative on these things. They would go from overpriced turds with useless guns and no clear mission to the most advanced Guided Missile Cruisers on planet Earth. And because Congress and the Navy has already decided that more Zumwalts will NOT be replacing Arleigh-Burkes moving forward, the next Destroyer (DDG) is going to be designed and built from scratch anyway. So now instead of designing and building both the next gen Destroyers AND the next gen Cruisers from scratch...which would be insanely expensive and extremely risky...we simply re-start Zumwalt production with minor changes to the design to become our next Cruisers and only have to design and build the next DDGs from scratch.
...and never one that was so useless
...and never one that made Admirals so rich.
I don't think we have any battleships any longer.
ОтветитьNot a Battleship.
Ответитьah yes the uss zoom walt thats a battleship
ОтветитьAt least the ship is commanded by Captain James Kirk.
ОтветитьThat's ship sucks trust me.
ОтветитьDid he say "captian James Kirk" ? brillaint!
Ответитьok if pelosi gets shot down then what?
ОтветитьNOT a battleship.
ОтветитьNo that is fake destroyer have 3 gun turret and not no cannon I know that is a CGI because battleshups and destroyers have turrets
Ответить🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮💩💩💩💩💩💩💩🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
ОтветитьZUMWALT is not a battleship.
ОтветитьJames Kirk, nice
ОтветитьAlguém roubou o perfil deste senhor Contra Almirante James Andam kirk para me chantagiar emocionalmente e assim fui vítima de burla, e este senhor nem sequer teve conhecimento, que deixou uma mulher de coração partido 💔em Portugal
ОтветитьNot a Battleship
ОтветитьFour billion for a surface ship? PT Barnum was right.
ОтветитьSix years later, it has been proven as the most expensive white elephant ever built.
ОтветитьLooks like 1970s attempt at a modern ship 🚢 after seeing avengers or Star Trek US navy ships
🚢 leave a lot to desire.
Its not a battle ship dumm goof balls.
ОтветитьSeeing this beauty made little 12 year old me want to join the navy
Ответитьsickening
ОтветитьCAPTAIN JAMES KIRK.
ОтветитьJames T Kirk?
ОтветитьNot a battleship. This is a tincan not a battleship.
ОтветитьIt’s a DESTROYER!!!!! My buddy who is assigned on the Zumwalt stated, that the technology and weapons that this ship has is so futuristic it’s almost unbelievable. He won’t say what or how, but says….sleep tight, it’s a ship to be reckoned with. That ship can do things that are only in movies and beyond. ❤❤❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸! Yeah yeah yeah…..it’s expensive, but I guarantee the Chinese and Russians don’t have anything close to this. Good Luck sinking it! I sleep better knowing it’s on the water!
ОтветитьGood Morning 🦚 bebi girl 👍 Good oke bebi 😘🍩😋🐚🦀
ОтветитьIt’s not built to be pretty. It’s built for task and purpose. All weap systems are designed to spec. modular.
My sons built this ship. They are proud of their work. And I am proud to be their father 🇺🇸
Was his name actually James Kirk ? Did I hear that right if so that's awesome!
ОтветитьTonga see the Form Vulcano 🌋👽 1977 26 November British tv👽
Ответить👽😊Switch off and then Earth -72 Grad Celsius sleep anno 2183/2187 anno
ОтветитьTurkey Earthquake 2019/2020 on paper Name Aria Morta TVin Italy Immobilian junkes smile
ОтветитьComplete industrial waste 😂 spent 7 billion US dollars (considering R&D costs). As a result, combat effectiveness garbage is dying. New technology is not equal to combat effectiveness, but like a piece of iron garbage 😂
ОтветитьÇan ordinary AP and HE shells be made for the big guns?
ОтветитьIt looks like many people beat me to the punch, reminding CBS evening news that this is a destroyer. It is not a battleship. And presently, the U.S. Navy is not operating any battleships. Come on CBS, terminology matters.
ОтветитьALL OF THEM ARE FOR SALE !! I’m not joking !
ОтветитьThe bring back the iowa’s . This thing is crap.
ОтветитьThe ship doesn't get the USS Title until the commissioning is performed. Millions more are being spent on these ships currently at HII Pascagoula where I work. I support 1000 and 1002. 1001 will be here after after one of the two are returned to the Navy
ОтветитьObscene waste of money!
ОтветитьWord Stealth define a car
Ответить