On board the USS Zumwalt, the Navy's pricey new battleship

On board the USS Zumwalt, the Navy's pricey new battleship

CBS Evening News

8 лет назад

1,103,089 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@j.kearney484
@j.kearney484 - 12.07.2021 21:56

its called a battleship, a cruiser, a destroyer and a ship of the line

mhhhhh

Ответить
@soujirosasaki7570
@soujirosasaki7570 - 24.08.2021 13:07

Why does that warship design reminds me of ironclad?

Ответить
@anitaboodram5660
@anitaboodram5660 - 03.09.2021 03:13

Taliban run

Ответить
@lowkeyscustomcars
@lowkeyscustomcars - 21.10.2021 06:53

Its actually junk an look where it is now just another example of $ laundering !

Ответить
@jeffharder8706
@jeffharder8706 - 24.10.2021 14:46

God that’s an ugly ship

Ответить
@Godrickdaddy420
@Godrickdaddy420 - 30.10.2021 08:52

Its so ugly smh. Modern warships are Dogwater.

Ответить
@pepper13111
@pepper13111 - 30.10.2021 19:48

Capitan Kirk?

Ответить
@johnnytyler5685
@johnnytyler5685 - 19.11.2021 06:40

I know this video is five years old now but watching this vid and reading some of the comments made me realize something. Why isn't the US Navy re-naming these things to Guided Missile Cruisers (CG) and re-starting production with the now-totally-useless front gun turrets replaced with more VLS cells? The Ticos are not only way too old...but they are actively being decommissioned and scrapped as we speak because of their age. And not only are they being scrapped, but a replacement Cruiser program HASN'T EVEN BEEN STARTED YET!!! We are decommissioning and scrapping the Ticos without any replacement available now or in the near future, and the Navy claims that Arleigh-Burkes can't simply take over the mission that the Ticos perform in a Carrier Strike Group. So why not do exactly what I just suggested?

It was all of the cutting-edge tech and the reduction in procurement numbers that drove the price of these things to ridiculous levels and got the program cancelled. But today all of that tech is far more mature than it was when the Zumwalt program started. Moreover, now that we KNOW the front guns are literally useless chunks of wasted steel, they can be removed from the plans and the front of the ship can be redesigned to carry even more VLS cells and a conventional 5" gun in a stealthy mount for protection from small surface vessels. How is this not the perfect solution? Instead of starting a new CG development program from scratch, we are simply re-starting Zumwalt production with a new classification (CGs instead of DDGs) and a new mission set.

One of the reasons why the Arleigh-Burkes supposedly can't take over the Tico's mission is a lack of space onboard the DDGs. Well, as this video shows, the Zumwalts have TONS of room on board. I'm sure I'm not the first person to think of doing this so why hasn't it gotten more traction in Congress and in the Navy? I've never heard of ANY discussions...even tentative ones...to convert the Zumwalts to Cruisers and restart production immediately in order to replace the aging, dilapidated Ticos. It seems like the damn perfect solution to me.

Doing so would not only fix the problem of a lack of Cruisers, but it will totally change the narrative on these things. They would go from overpriced turds with useless guns and no clear mission to the most advanced Guided Missile Cruisers on planet Earth. And because Congress and the Navy has already decided that more Zumwalts will NOT be replacing Arleigh-Burkes moving forward, the next Destroyer (DDG) is going to be designed and built from scratch anyway. So now instead of designing and building both the next gen Destroyers AND the next gen Cruisers from scratch...which would be insanely expensive and extremely risky...we simply re-start Zumwalt production with minor changes to the design to become our next Cruisers and only have to design and build the next DDGs from scratch.

Ответить
@judsonkr
@judsonkr - 24.11.2021 10:31

...and never one that was so useless
...and never one that made Admirals so rich.

Ответить
@guidosarducci3047
@guidosarducci3047 - 09.01.2022 00:19

I don't think we have any battleships any longer.

Ответить
@michaelnoone5377
@michaelnoone5377 - 18.05.2022 22:33

Not a Battleship.

Ответить
@99Yeti
@99Yeti - 24.05.2022 00:20

ah yes the uss zoom walt thats a battleship

Ответить
@RHTeebs
@RHTeebs - 24.06.2022 02:23

At least the ship is commanded by Captain James Kirk.

Ответить
@Bomooney
@Bomooney - 30.06.2022 07:56

That's ship sucks trust me.

Ответить
@kermitTheFrog466
@kermitTheFrog466 - 10.07.2022 19:17

Did he say "captian James Kirk" ? brillaint!

Ответить
@stevencardoza1548
@stevencardoza1548 - 30.07.2022 03:02

ok if pelosi gets shot down then what?

Ответить
@nohandle62
@nohandle62 - 17.10.2022 01:14

NOT a battleship.

Ответить
@F-22_gorillatagplayer
@F-22_gorillatagplayer - 08.12.2022 18:22

No that is fake destroyer have 3 gun turret and not no cannon I know that is a CGI because battleshups and destroyers have turrets

Ответить
@ТомаРязанцева-ч2з
@ТомаРязанцева-ч2з - 24.12.2022 03:40

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮💩💩💩💩💩💩💩🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Ответить
@rontribbey9038
@rontribbey9038 - 27.12.2022 21:47

ZUMWALT is not a battleship.

Ответить
@boostergoal65
@boostergoal65 - 21.01.2023 03:59

James Kirk, nice

Ответить
@fernandacondinho8030
@fernandacondinho8030 - 24.01.2023 17:30

Alguém roubou o perfil deste senhor Contra Almirante James Andam kirk para me chantagiar emocionalmente e assim fui vítima de burla, e este senhor nem sequer teve conhecimento, que deixou uma mulher de coração partido 💔em Portugal

Ответить
@johnhess351
@johnhess351 - 31.03.2023 22:03

Not a Battleship

Ответить
@opprometheus
@opprometheus - 10.04.2023 23:41

Four billion for a surface ship? PT Barnum was right.

Ответить
@annl7708
@annl7708 - 19.04.2023 15:00

Six years later, it has been proven as the most expensive white elephant ever built.

Ответить
@efexzium
@efexzium - 11.06.2023 21:49

Looks like 1970s attempt at a modern ship 🚢 after seeing avengers or Star Trek US navy ships
🚢 leave a lot to desire.

Ответить
@rontribbey9038
@rontribbey9038 - 13.06.2023 20:54

Its not a battle ship dumm goof balls.

Ответить
@ryankujawa7062
@ryankujawa7062 - 02.07.2023 23:07

Seeing this beauty made little 12 year old me want to join the navy

Ответить
@billklacks9908
@billklacks9908 - 05.08.2023 06:34

sickening

Ответить
@jessegreer862
@jessegreer862 - 08.09.2023 14:55

CAPTAIN JAMES KIRK.

Ответить
@awol354
@awol354 - 09.09.2023 19:19

James T Kirk?

Ответить
@planetjupiter2551
@planetjupiter2551 - 19.09.2023 00:11

Not a battleship. This is a tincan not a battleship.

Ответить
@CLanzetta1970-
@CLanzetta1970- - 06.10.2023 01:42

It’s a DESTROYER!!!!! My buddy who is assigned on the Zumwalt stated, that the technology and weapons that this ship has is so futuristic it’s almost unbelievable. He won’t say what or how, but says….sleep tight, it’s a ship to be reckoned with. That ship can do things that are only in movies and beyond. ❤❤❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸! Yeah yeah yeah…..it’s expensive, but I guarantee the Chinese and Russians don’t have anything close to this. Good Luck sinking it! I sleep better knowing it’s on the water!

Ответить
@FaimNana
@FaimNana - 17.10.2023 03:11

Good Morning 🦚 bebi girl 👍 Good oke bebi 😘🍩😋🐚🦀

Ответить
@colinjames7569
@colinjames7569 - 08.11.2023 13:03

It’s not built to be pretty. It’s built for task and purpose. All weap systems are designed to spec. modular.
My sons built this ship. They are proud of their work. And I am proud to be their father 🇺🇸

Ответить
@JimD410
@JimD410 - 08.12.2023 01:03

Was his name actually James Kirk ? Did I hear that right if so that's awesome!

Ответить
@AndreaRomanelli-i4p
@AndreaRomanelli-i4p - 26.01.2024 23:03

Tonga see the Form Vulcano 🌋👽 1977 26 November British tv👽

Ответить
@AndreaRomanelli-i4p
@AndreaRomanelli-i4p - 26.01.2024 23:06

👽😊Switch off and then Earth -72 Grad Celsius sleep anno 2183/2187 anno

Ответить
@AndreaRomanelli-i4p
@AndreaRomanelli-i4p - 26.01.2024 23:13

Turkey Earthquake 2019/2020 on paper Name Aria Morta TVin Italy Immobilian junkes smile

Ответить
@connermini9390
@connermini9390 - 06.02.2024 09:34

Complete industrial waste 😂 spent 7 billion US dollars (considering R&D costs). As a result, combat effectiveness garbage is dying. New technology is not equal to combat effectiveness, but like a piece of iron garbage 😂

Ответить
@kempmt1
@kempmt1 - 17.02.2024 05:41

Çan ordinary AP and HE shells be made for the big guns?

Ответить
@muhlenberg2608
@muhlenberg2608 - 28.02.2024 23:55

It looks like many people beat me to the punch, reminding CBS evening news that this is a destroyer. It is not a battleship. And presently, the U.S. Navy is not operating any battleships. Come on CBS, terminology matters.

Ответить
@GreenTambourine1
@GreenTambourine1 - 02.03.2024 04:38

ALL OF THEM ARE FOR SALE !! I’m not joking !

Ответить
@patriotic80
@patriotic80 - 09.04.2024 00:40

The bring back the iowa’s . This thing is crap.

Ответить
@beachcomber39553
@beachcomber39553 - 13.10.2024 19:19

The ship doesn't get the USS Title until the commissioning is performed. Millions more are being spent on these ships currently at HII Pascagoula where I work. I support 1000 and 1002. 1001 will be here after after one of the two are returned to the Navy

Ответить
@saha-q5z
@saha-q5z - 24.10.2024 20:13

Obscene waste of money!

Ответить
@NicholasBartel-rl8se
@NicholasBartel-rl8se - 29.10.2024 00:43

Word Stealth define a car

Ответить