SpaceX's to Launch Falcon Heavy A $5 Billion Spacecraft into orbit Shocked NASA!

SpaceX's to Launch Falcon Heavy A $5 Billion Spacecraft into orbit Shocked NASA!

ALPHA TECH

5 месяцев назад

28,093 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@kevinbissett293
@kevinbissett293 - 09.06.2024 14:38

Good Morning. NASA and the government seems to always put SpaceX on the back burner. The politics of this is disgusting. Us some uncommon, common sense. Have a Great Sunday my friend.

Ответить
@abiepr_328
@abiepr_328 - 09.06.2024 14:43

ooo

Ответить
@markrosenthal9108
@markrosenthal9108 - 09.06.2024 15:13

“ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS, EXCEPT EUROPA.
ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE.
USE THEM TOGETHER. USE THEM IN PEACE.”

Ответить
@garylester3976
@garylester3976 - 09.06.2024 15:14

I think I know what happened on the Starship test flight number four.
It was doing fine at high altitude, velocity going down slowly but steadily, and then it started dropping into more dense air and was going too fast and began taking extreme damage. And before it was over, pretty burnt, even though it managed the landing flip and attempted the landing burn.

The root of the problem was likely the hull at high altitude was angled too far back trying to get more braking effect, and they werent getting any lift, so what they likely got was a ballistic parabola without enough velocity loss at the beginning, which translated into the extreme damage later.

Basically to get any lift, the hull would have to be at 45° or less from horizontal.

In my writs on the suggested flight profile, I mentioned between 5° & 15°, Which would have turned the hull and flappers into lifting shapes and surfaces, and extended that ballistic parabola much longer, and likely got more braking over all, than trying for too much at once.
They got too greedy on braking, and lost potential effect of air resistance over time, and went into the hot soup too soon and too fast.
I suggest on the next flight they try reducing the hull angle from horizontal, and starting the re-entry sooner, and getting as much distance as possible before dropping into thicker air.

That they cant just get chesty and get all the velocity reduction needed, has to have more finessé to the profile,.and get the high in thin air lengthened out as much as possible, so that they are flying the ship on the velocity and keeping it up long enough the velocity drops, and not just getting a bullet keyholing a ballistic parabola.

If you have excess speed, enough of it should be turned into lift, to stay above the dense levels, long enough that more subtile drag has time to work.

So I repeat: fly the hull at about 5° nose up from horizontal, and slowly over time increase that angle as velocity drops, and should go no more than about 15° until you are near subsonic.
And only then allow the ship to drop into denser air.

You need an intelligent flight, not a ballistic arc.
Otherwise, the ships wont be reusable, and only barely salvageable for scrap.

Ответить
@k.sullivan6303
@k.sullivan6303 - 09.06.2024 15:56

Shag Wellington was SHOCKED!

Ответить
@k.sullivan6303
@k.sullivan6303 - 09.06.2024 15:56

Buzz Killington was all hum haw about it. What friggin' buzz kill that guy is!

Ответить
@k.sullivan6303
@k.sullivan6303 - 09.06.2024 16:05

Sooo...how about we nuke it and see what happens? Who would suggest that?

Ответить
@dhen-marccastillon923
@dhen-marccastillon923 - 09.06.2024 16:08

HELLO MAHAL 💞 PANG ELON DAGHANA NA PAGHIMO KARON KAY SUNOD BUSY NA KA KAAYONG NAKO TANAN DIDTO SA MARS DAGHAN TA PANGHIMO ON MGA NEGOSYO NIMO TANAN PALAGING LAB LAB KAAYONGHONEYDARLING❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Ответить
@danielnogrady9004
@danielnogrady9004 - 09.06.2024 16:08

Very nice!

Ответить
@fionajack9160
@fionajack9160 - 09.06.2024 16:32

Title is gibberish

What’s new and shocking since yesterday

Ответить
@stephensfarms7165
@stephensfarms7165 - 09.06.2024 17:04

Thanks enjoyed watching the video 🌟🌟👍

Ответить
@tmg7476
@tmg7476 - 09.06.2024 17:06

Usual lousy headline but more informative video.

Ответить
@jroar123
@jroar123 - 09.06.2024 17:27

Europa is a moon bathed in radiation from Jupiter. The surface is sterile and any liquid too hard to utilize. The entire mission is a waist of money.

Ответить
@dalejones4195
@dalejones4195 - 09.06.2024 19:06

Did SpaceX recover the booster and the Starship on flight 4

Ответить
@JasmineSinclair-i3n
@JasmineSinclair-i3n - 09.06.2024 20:29

Boeing still has an army of lobbyists, and they contribute millions to political campaigns (legal bribery). I'm glad the good guys, and fairness, won this time. Corruption is evil, and we should fight it at every opportunity.

Ответить
@semorgh2854
@semorgh2854 - 09.06.2024 21:31

I found out that the ratio of the fuel to total weight of a rocket is 90 to 98 percent. with this ratio you are only limited to go to Mars and that is the end of the road.
If researchers do more research on findings of Ning Li (the scientist) you can create a ZPE (zero point Energy) which is Directly connected to Universe's Magnetic field your efficiency will be flipped which means you would have a sustained(and constant) Fuel with efficiency of up to 90 percent payload and total weight of spaceship( this means your fuel is 10% of the Total weight).
the current efficiency is : for every 10 kilos you send to space you have to have 90 kilos of fuel. If Earth had This efficiency it would not Rotate and it would fall into Sun.
Talking about Earth efficiency which is 65-70 percent which means 30-35 percent of the Earth is the Molten IRON in the core.
it has to be that high since Earth is MASSIVE. And since we all know gravitational force is much weaker than Magnetic field Earth has established its distance from Sun and other planets with its Magnetic field.

Ответить
@tbur8901
@tbur8901 - 09.06.2024 21:41

Perhaps NASA needs to design a standardised serial built modular probe and a standard lander for solar system missions to cut costs and development time ?
Adapted to SpaceX payloads.

Ответить
@kevinsehl9156
@kevinsehl9156 - 09.06.2024 22:13

I wish this channel didn't bash competitors so much. Competition is healthy and everyone learns from each other. This guy sounds like a toddler on a playground, beating up the other kids. I hope it doesn't take losing an astronaut to be a little humbler.

Ответить
@davidrizzardi2277
@davidrizzardi2277 - 09.06.2024 23:48

So, a private business can do it for 178 million, but our illustrious, brain driven EXPERTS needed 3 BILLION to accomplish the exact same thing. WTF? We had better vote every one of these politicians out of office and replace them with proven successful business people. Oh wait, I believe Trump is a successful business person. There you go.

Ответить
@oswynjames8308
@oswynjames8308 - 10.06.2024 04:07

The toymaker and his burning biliondollar rockets!

Ответить
@nighttow8780
@nighttow8780 - 10.06.2024 06:02

The sun is NOT stationary. It is traveling through space at mind boggling speed

Ответить
@stephengordon4081
@stephengordon4081 - 10.06.2024 08:11

Put Elon on it

Ответить
@RoBear-xo6zw
@RoBear-xo6zw - 10.06.2024 13:28

If, I was launching Starship test vehicles… I would outfit one with solar panels, for a one way trip to orbiting Mars… and set up an autonomous observation platform manned by Grok or something 😂🎉🎉

No need for heat tiles or insulation or fins… If, a Tesla can go there, so can Grok😂

Survey for the colony location and weather observations, etc…🚀

October 6, 2020… plus 26 months plus 26 months… 4 yrs 4 months… February 2025… next closest alignment…

The thing is, Elon can do this now and not wait for 2027 or whatever… Also , just another business expense for Space X…

SSS-1… Starship Scout- 1… and give Scout a brain 🧐🙃🤙🏻

And setup Grok-SSS-1, with a twitter-X account…

And if, Optimus is up to it… put a Bot crew onboard… and a greenhouse 🍀

Between Tesla and SpaceX and X.ai… Elon can put the first test SSS-1 together in no time at all …

SSS-2, would be sent to every planet and moon of interest… with StarLink satellites to deploy, along with interplanetary communications equipment… with Grok leading the way and the conversation on X…

By the time the supercomputer is online in 2025… Grok will be orbiting Mars🚀🧐🙃🤙🏻

Ответить
@liongjiahwong5478
@liongjiahwong5478 - 11.06.2024 14:22

Talk and talk, starships, Space X, wow here wow there.. go land on the moon and let the world know your superiority.

Ответить
@DiggerD-w6r
@DiggerD-w6r - 12.06.2024 11:26

Time for exporation to go commercial. NASA is too enifficient.

Ответить
@Mannicx
@Mannicx - 16.06.2024 03:11

Can you name all the Falcon Heavy successful missions?

Ответить

Our little baby turns 3!! Kenza Zouiten Subosic