DEBATE: Flat Vs Globe | Brian & Plane Reality Vs Mordwand & Roohif | Podcast

What the hell is Brian talking about. He’s a very odd man

Typical flat earth L.

Globe model = 💥..🌎

Dome ⌒ + Water ꕀꕀꕀꕀꕀ = ⌓ model -------------------------------FL/\T E/\RTH --> We observe AIR PRESSURE and FLAT WATER...
There is no experiment to replicate the globe model because globe physics DO NOT EXIST
You have never seen a working globe model
You can't have a working globe model with No measured curve, no motion around a curve, no open vacuum, no gravity, NO light years, no cosmic evolution no big bang.

Can't replicate the globe model because its impossible
The globe is impossible, therefore it doesn't exist

Brian's constant interruptions with meaningless talking points is infuriating, please don't have him on again, or if you do have him on, please mute him the whole time and maybe black out his screen too.

balltards think an imaginary big bang can turns rocks into people and then pretend they are not RELIGIOUS fundies

Ryan: The "Modern" in modern day debate means that we address the current modern take on the debate topic.

Brian: Hold my beer, I'm going to talk about things that were debunked years ago and show that I haven't learnt a thing.

Don't bother standing at the Ifel tower and walking away from it.. it'll always APPEAR taller than you 😂

Oh, dear……..it’s like Brian and Plane Reality brought a crayon to an adult conversation (probably to eat)……this was a total non debate.

Plane reality hates precision instruments

Dude said the word horizon so often in that presentation that every other word in-between just merged into Charlie Brown teacher wompwompwomp Horizon wompwomp Horizon wompwompwompwompwomp Horizon

Imagine believing mankind doesn't know the shape of the earth, yet we have developed the cloud of internet knowledge that you can pick up with your phone. The stupidity is astounding.

Didn't Stitcher go defunkt? It was a good app, but as far as I know, it's no longer working (at least on Android).

brian keeps asking for a physical demonstration but he fails to realize globers never leave their house that’s why they will never have a physical demonstration 🤣

Another globberhead ownage.

No one is scared of small numbers. This is Roohif's only weapon, numerical semantics and ignoring perspective, optics, weather phenomema, empirical evidence. Plus like every other globberhead, has nothing to show to prove any of it. All the stuff he does show only proves flat earth 😂

Why debate these Flat Earth degenerates?? It’s a waste of time. They bathe in their ignorance

Buoy is pronounced as “boy” not boo-ee because it is short for buoyant!

@globers
There is no working globe model. THAT is a FACT. Thats why you and every other triggered glober with your shared IQ of 40 all spam with triggered emotional derp.

There is no experiment to replicate the globe model because globe physics DO NOT EXIST
​​YOU have never seen a working globe model

Globe model = 💥--->..🌎
You can't have a working globe model with No measured curve, no motion around a curve, no open vacuum, no gravity, NO light years,no cosmic evolution.

Can't replicate the globe model because its impossible
The globe is impossible, therefore it doesn't exist

Which "real world physics and experiments" do you naively think prove the globe?

Start with the origins of your cartoon globe..... Explain how your imaginary globe physics turned nothing into a globe. Name the experiments and real world physics?

Show a working physical globe model.

EXAMPLE: Dome ⌒ + Water ꕀꕀꕀꕀꕀ = ⌓ model -------------------------------FL/\T E/\RTH --> We observe AIR PRESSURE and FLAT WATER...
working model :Place a water filled bottle horizontal , the water in the bottle at rest is FLAT STATIONARY and PRESSURIZED . WELCOME TO FLAT EARTH

F l a t a F

Beautifully done with the 4 points! Haven't seen that before. Excellent SealionPrime!

Are these guys honestly saying that the only looking down is looking at your feet????? They can’t understand that 0.000001 degrees off 0 is either up or down. This is why you have to talk to them like 5 year olds. This is their mentality

Ryan you need to learn to STFU. You finally have a FE debate without people yelling and screaming and you have to incessantly interrupt.

Flerfs will always deny accuracy because the devil is in the detail

Eye balling shit and saying "ye fuck it" gives them an "excuse" to deny reality and call all us educated, devil worshipper's

These flerfs are the lowest of the low IQ flerfs, and yet Roohif and pal can’t seem to ever make anything stick. You chased every red herring Brian threw and allowed them to lie without consequence or correction. Y’all couldn’t even pick this low hanging fruit with any success. Wow.

How funny roohif asked for to model obstruction At 117:02 (which we did)... when modeling ANY object reappearing over a ramp in air is why the globe fails. Me as a flatearther am about to do a realistic scaled Version of the globe and I will Show the full spectrum of light doesnt make sth reappear in a realistic scaled model.

Please fix the audio. Voices are so low. When commercials come on, it's so damn loud.

Ryan can you do everyone a favour and just mute yourself after the introductions until the end of the debate.

I swear flerfs get dumber by the day.

the horizon is an apparent location.

Ok here's the issue: if the Earth were flat, there wouldn't even be a horizon at all - in so far as it being a clear, distinct line. It would just blur into the distance.
Now, flerfs can come up with all kinds of things as to why there would be a horizon on a flat Earth, and we can summarise those explanations as simply "reason X".
But, if the Earth were really flat and we did in fact see an indistinct blur instead of a clear horizon, we all know that no flerf would say "hmm, that's strange, there should be a clear horizon because of reason X" Instead, they would declare it as flat Earth proof and call it a day.

"The outliers are the ones that don't fit in the normal bundle"

Where do you find these idiots? The stupidity is honestly impressive.

Once you realise that the globe model and earth are measured flat with elevation angles, it ends the debate.

Omg these flerfs are seriously saying. " Hey i look at thing. Therefore it is" and dismiss actual accurate measurements. They literally said " i dont care about precision instruments"..mind boggling delusion

Man it's hilarious listening to flat earthers

If they actually put this much effort in to worthwhile work, they might actually be able to get a minimum wage job.

"someone who knows what they're talking about, like Witsit"

Lmao

With the data to prove the Earth is a globe we can make a bible for the globe religion. Aglobmen!

I love it when Flerfs post photographic evidence of Earth’s curvature and then claim it’s something else.
Why are we even debating these ppl?

Y'all tell me if I'm missing anything by skipping this, and any other debate where there are "teams" on both sides.

Its flat and stationary

GRAVITY is a BS globe claim. BS GLOBE CLAIMS = NO GLOBE

CAUSE /EFFECT
A scientific theory differs from a scientific fact or scientific law in that a theory seeks to explain "why" or "how", whereas a fact is a simple, basic observation and a law is an empirical description of a relationship between facts and/or other laws.


scientific method: research, problem, hypothesis, project experimentation, and project conclusion.

The logical approach to the "scientific method" includes : Question. Research. Hypothesis/Prediction. TEST/Experiment. Observation. Study Results/Conclusion. Presentation/REPEAT

manipulate independent variables (cause) and measure the effect on dependent variables to better understand cause-and-effect relationships

where did you get your gravity? To test a hypothesis, the independent variable must be altered.

GLOBER gravity has no cause and cannot be changed and is therefore not an independent variable.

Water and light are considered independent because they can be changed, while gravity cannot be changed and is therefore not an independent variable.

So far Flat Earthers were always arguing that the effect of things falling down does not correlate to the cause of gravity both explanation/description by Einstein and Newton without alternative/replacement density just circles back to mass and accelaration and electromagnetism would mean that large polarized objects would float but gravity is only attractive not repulsive.

Hey Ryan, big fan of you as mod, but so many times in this debate you pass the mic to the flat side when they keep interrupting Lucas.

Globe side:gives imperical evidence

Flerfe:"uhhh no math don't make sense"

Im right you're wrong wa wa wa !!! Like little man children

Brian is not only aggressively stupid, but he is rude and obnoxious. I hope he is never invited back, even his own partner was getting bothered with him.