James Webb Discovered Something So Improbable, It Shouldn’t Ever Happen

Sorry for giving you a heart attack...

Aren't Pluto and Charon in a binary orbit? I know where I sit on the Dunning Kruger graph when it comes to astronomy but like, maybe binary systems are more common when there's less sources of strong gravitational interference?

We live in an infinite universe, either something is impossible or it's happened an infinite number of times regardless of how improbable it may be.

Peter Griffin has died

my favorite yap channel until I sleep

“The odds are astronomical”
Well… yeah…

It's important to consider the place where we can see them, as it's not a common occurrence, in the sense the sky is not full of Orion nebulas.

just thinking out loud. you have dense nebula gas. it itself cant form a planet, but if any planet gets ejected into that dense nebula gas would that be enough to form a Jupiter size planet? so the reason we see a lot of jupiter size rogue planets is either because our instruments cannot see smaller planets. or smaller planets ejected during solar system birth are ejected into gas dense areas and grow to jupiter size?

You can go to the other side of space to mine a planet or you can fire a massive object to eject planets you want to mine so that they come to you.

Isn't that the point of the universe? A ginormous random number generator, so big that even the most improbable configurations can occur.

They have their own ideas about how things work and should work. A fascinatingly epic struggle ensues.

Could it be, not and yet related, that the laws our physics are different on different galaxy than our, like gravity and all of it ? Could it be. That smart 😅

Could a protoplanet require "seeding" by a smaller high density masses stirring a larger gas cloud and making it coalesce aroung high gravity nodules.

What if the Sun and Jupiter are meant to be binary stars?

The odds are astronomical, but then again, we are talking about outer space

In the end, The God of our universe has blessed our Astronomers and Scientists with great discoveries.

Hypothetically speaking, the assumption “life” requiring a star to exist in a system is a clear sign of bias.

Two concepts with equal out comes.

The idea of a civilization completely “masking” their systems star as to hide themself from others is a potential we should consider.

The aspect of life existing in the void of space isn’t unrealistic. Rouge planets or even deep space civilizations could inhabit locations that we’d consider impossible.

The idea of, everywhere or nowhere is interesting. The idea that life is all over the universe could be simply explained by stars. None traditionally, the idea stars are “artificial” created, is not crazy. The idea all stars are, in fact, alien civilizations.

In an infinite expanse it is more improbable that something doesn't exist.

"One thing scientists all agree on is that our models of the universe are certainly WRONG!" ... Does this mean that somebody in the scientific community might someday admit that asteroids don't just miraculously morph into hydrogen whenever they crash into Jupiter? -- Which, oh by the way, is what has spared Earth from being the target of the shooting gallery for billions of years!!

THAT WASNT A FUNNY PRANK BRO

Maybe Orion has been collecting them for ornaments on its belt.

Scientists say it’s improbable and freak out that it happens, and yet no scientist is probably like: “It’s not impossible”

That was me in Universe Sandbox 2, sorry

Lol religion 101

Seeing a pool table with all white balls with only numbers makes me unreasonably upset..where’s the pretty colors :’(

Seeing as the universe is pretty much infinite & we don't know anything I don't see how you can really think anythings impossible.

It's likely that planets are also formed as stars are sometimes, like pearls on cosmic filaments that correspond to birkeland currents, collecting matter through marklund convection. In that case it's not weird that they form in pairs that orbit each other, as most stars do.

i eould rather imagine i am somewhere else, especialy with you history of spewing nonsensical information

Maybe u answer this later but it seems clear that they are essentially a failed star, where instead of all the gas combining, or having enough gas to become a binary star system, they get stuck as binary big bois

Is microlensing a relativistic effect? It is caused by GR effects but I think it's improper to say it's a relativistic process. The fact the the curvature of spacetime causes photons to take curved paths is not unique to things that are small and fast.

ha ha ha ha ha you got me there! XD Aw sad.

According to pretty much every proto civilization everywhere, Saturn used to be the sun. We see this in the Americas, in Asia, in Europe, in the middle east, and Australia.

If it's already happened then the odds are 100% in favor of it happening.

The JWT has certainly provided more questions than affirmations, to be sure. Makes one think that perhaps the "science" might just be off a tad

stars are formed along the Z pinch of plasma filaments and stars form planets and spit them out magnetic fields need electricity to be present that would be p[plasma energy flowing creates MAGNETIC FIELDDS, AND PLASMA IS Every where it connects everything

Brought to you by people who, in the words actually spoken by a few of them, will only accept a naturalistic explanation for the existence of the universe and by extension, life on this planet.
They all predicted the JWST would show us galaxies in their earliest stages of formation. "Way out there" equals "way back in time."
Instead, we see fully formed galaxies, as predicted by Dr Jason Lisle.
Maybe you should give his vids on the JWST results and other actual, observable science on this site a look?

Who's to say that the Kuiper Belt isn't forming JuMBOs right now and will lose them at the weak edge of Sol's pull after it goes nova again? We are just so small and short-lived that we haven't the time scale to see it happening. It's like glass has properties of a liquid, but we don't see it as such until a lifetime (or more) has passed. We are moving slowly enough through time-space that objects seem solid that are actually liquid, like the planet. Earthquakes ripple the earth like a liquid. It's about the only time (molten rock aside) that we recognize just how fluid rock can be.

On that note — what if everything has liquid properties in other dimensions and we are like gerridae? Perhaps we don't experience the other dimensions and other frequencies like most denizens of the universe. We may be skating through the pond scum of a small lake in the universe, but we call it "the universe" because we are too limited to know better. One day, we may discover that electrons duck into another dimension and when they do so, their movement in and out of that other space is what keeps all matter "afloat" for us to interact with.

Is it bed time already? Cripes, I get punchy when tired. And I also get inspired to post wild theories without mathematical backup. XD

That's odd, given the JWST is studying and staying located next to the sun

Surely a very smal black hole could provide the impetus in the cosmic dust cloud to provide the missing energy to create the jumbos. Not every black hole has to be big straight away.

So love this as am just an educated person and not a scientist of any kind, but even me know what ! Out there 😅

I think how do the balls fit in the same pocket.

Title description could be better...but great content

If atoms can get together and form a life form, anything is possible.

You scared me.

So the early universe had a bunch of supermovas, which formed metal and rock particles, which are in the nebula, right?

So the gassesc compress into brown dwarfs or stars, and the non-gas, which doesn't try to repel away, form into smaller planets.

Right? No?

No mention or Plasma anywhere?
Is it forbidden for today's cartel Cosmology Club to mention "Plasma" and it's electrodynamic forces of electro-magnetism and its induction?