RUSSIAN MEDIA REPORTS OF TU 160 OUTRUNNING F35 SEEMS FAKE ! DEFENSE UPDATES

RUSSIAN MEDIA REPORTS OF TU 160 OUTRUNNING F35 SEEMS FAKE ! DEFENSE UPDATES

Defense Updates

5 лет назад

251,385 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@livetosurvive4558
@livetosurvive4558 - 27.04.2021 20:01

according to google the tu 160 has a top speed of mach 1.6, and the f 35 is mach 1.3. So, it does make sense if it is true. None of this matters if the f 35 can out maneuver, and out shoot it.

Ответить
@vincentperez7542
@vincentperez7542 - 27.04.2021 20:34

The F35 is piece of shit.. my Dodge neon can out run that crap...

Ответить
@Tonetwisters
@Tonetwisters - 27.04.2021 21:46

First thing to remember: Jesus said, Satan is the father of all lies. I SAY: Putin is a child of Satan. NEVER DOUBT IT. Russia will lie its eyes out.

Ответить
@paulybassman7311
@paulybassman7311 - 27.04.2021 22:12

Interpret or intercept??

Ответить
@gypsysinclaire5933
@gypsysinclaire5933 - 28.04.2021 01:49

In military,things like that are not reported.

Ответить
@rake199
@rake199 - 28.04.2021 03:23

F35 is a POS so prob true

Ответить
@GPJACKSOGA
@GPJACKSOGA - 28.04.2021 03:23

Well Mr defence expert, the max for TU-160 is over Mach 2 while the F-35 disaster is only 1.6 Mach.

Ответить
@chrisschumacher5413
@chrisschumacher5413 - 28.04.2021 03:46

Somebody should teach this narrator how to pronounce names and places. Every video I've heard him narrate, he mispronounces several names and places. It's quite annoying.

Ответить
@pizzaman5169
@pizzaman5169 - 28.04.2021 05:14

It was probably a lot easier for the Russians to copy just the body of the B-1, but they don't have what's on the inside, technologically speaking ! You may be able to duplicate the body of a new a new NASCAR racer, but it's not quite so easy to replicate what's inside, all that makes it a go-fast ride. Face it... , the Russians & the Chinese lie almost as much as trump !! They may say that big plane is pretty fast (Mach 2) , but the reality is probably a long way from it. Regardless of what is true, that big plane can't out run the AIM 120D missile, Mach 4 & 105 mile range. It will need one helluva head start !!

Ответить
@bigbob1699
@bigbob1699 - 28.04.2021 05:15

All the fighters have to do is keep the bomber inside the range of the air to air missals .

Ответить
@RobinRobertsesq
@RobinRobertsesq - 28.04.2021 06:25

Since when is an F35 an interceptor?

Ответить
@tolitsdterrible4785
@tolitsdterrible4785 - 28.04.2021 08:20

There's no such thing as independent and free media in Russia. They're all Putin's mouthpieces.

Ответить
@michaelwalters3970
@michaelwalters3970 - 28.04.2021 15:54

Outran because they weren't being chased.

Ответить
@williamwallace69
@williamwallace69 - 29.04.2021 05:15

You mean to say "intercept?"

Ответить
@jqmachgunner2577
@jqmachgunner2577 - 29.04.2021 23:17

The new and enhanced Combat Intel System reduces identification confusion to a minimum. In a shooting war, if you are a neutral, you had better get out of the way or you will be targeted. Also, keep in mind that the F-22s and F-35s invisibly approach enemy targets and then shoot them with missiles at ranges where it is impossible to outrun, out maneuver, and outwit the missile. It is a new PARADIGM that the old minds simply cannot accept because they are rooted in aerial dogfights where the most agile and powerful usually wins. BTW, S400s and the new S500s? They longer are significant players as their proximity defenses are easily overwhelmed by drone attacks leaving its core bare naked and vulnerable to cruise and other missile attacks. The value of these air defenses dropped like rocks after it became widely known low cost drone swarm attacks open them wide open to being eliminated. BTW, why do you think Turkey suddenly cancelled its orders for S400s?

Ответить
@cocodog85
@cocodog85 - 30.04.2021 04:04

f 35...is the king with no clothes.

Ответить
@mohamedabdi2695
@mohamedabdi2695 - 30.04.2021 07:28

America the home fake news and propaganda end of an era 😢

Ответить
@calcrappie8507
@calcrappie8507 - 30.04.2021 19:24

F-35 wasn't designed to win any speed races.

Ответить
@ThaSilentOne420
@ThaSilentOne420 - 30.04.2021 21:00

Doubt it . even if it did if it wasnt able to cover the 50+ miles of range of the lock on if it came to it

Ответить
@ghostrider88jinetedelfanta31
@ghostrider88jinetedelfanta31 - 01.05.2021 12:46

As someone else pointed out, if you make the bomber turn back/away from the target , the intercept was successful 👍. It's acknowledged that the F35 is slow, and not going to run down a mach 2 plane. Remember though, supersonic flight requires afterburners, a whale like the TU160 is going to gulp down a huge amount of fuel. The question is, how close did the F35's get to the Blackjack, before their crew noticed the F35's? Assuming this really happened, which everyone involved is denying 🤔. Also the TU160 is a pretty big radar target itself. 🛰

Ответить
@llamudos9809
@llamudos9809 - 01.05.2021 15:59

f-35 A2A missile will not be out run that is a fact.

Ответить
@andrewlawrence9340
@andrewlawrence9340 - 02.05.2021 00:37

“Maybe be fake”? Strange use of “interpret”. This is not a western product. So who is behind this stuff?

Ответить
@andrewlawrence9340
@andrewlawrence9340 - 02.05.2021 00:38

“Marginal” sea? Doesn’t know how to pronounce “archipelago.” Who is running this channel?

Ответить
@Deathstaroya
@Deathstaroya - 02.05.2021 03:29

looks like a Concord on roids

Ответить
@jimtoomey9522
@jimtoomey9522 - 03.05.2021 00:57

Too many ads.

Ответить
@marknelson463
@marknelson463 - 04.05.2021 00:39

What kind of radar did they have to see(detect) a f35 it be very good

Ответить
@williamdawson3792
@williamdawson3792 - 04.05.2021 13:13

Run Russia Run !!!!

Ответить
@baconcrusader7476
@baconcrusader7476 - 05.05.2021 13:48

Russians setting themselves up to fail.

Ответить
@1563ckg43
@1563ckg43 - 07.05.2021 02:45

The Lockheed SR-71 Black Bird (1966 arena) could simply outrun most missiles (2,193 mph-Mach 3) or if it detected a missile launch it could just speed up moving out of the missiles range. It’s design had minimum stealth characteristics (the wings reflected radar to a point) and its fuel was chemically doped not to leave a big exhaust trail. And most missiles of that area could touch its 80,000 feet altitude service ceiling.

Ответить
@aardvarkansaw
@aardvarkansaw - 08.05.2021 00:27

You have a few auto correct errors that your "voice reads to us.

Ответить
@aardvarkansaw
@aardvarkansaw - 08.05.2021 00:29

An F 15 is faster that this very fast Russian bomber. The F 35 is slower. If there are ship or land based missiles in the vicinity that can take out this big fast bomber ?

Ответить
@aardvarkansaw
@aardvarkansaw - 08.05.2021 00:35

Generally in all of your videos, when writing the script, and quoting someone: It is better to state their title or position FIRST and then state their name. This prepares the listen with a context before naming the individual.

Ответить
@henrysanchez4810
@henrysanchez4810 - 08.05.2021 02:07

No way that can happen..

Ответить
@juanluna6600
@juanluna6600 - 09.05.2021 08:20

Fake news from russia and china hahaha bullshit...

Ответить
@charleskuyon9752
@charleskuyon9752 - 09.05.2021 11:06

Your concluding statements are correct. However, the tu - 160 has protection missile system against attack.

Ответить
@markfrost8745
@markfrost8745 - 10.05.2021 13:45

As if all intercepts are from the rear, what a joke! Another point, the TU-160s never knew the F-35s were there until the pilots of the F-35s let them see they were there. Ooops. How long were the F-35s in the Blackjack's blind spot just hanging out.

Ответить
@redstone51
@redstone51 - 11.05.2021 03:58

Listening to the Soviet or Chinese media is much like listening to CNN and Wolf Blitzed!!!

Ответить
@MarineScoutSniper
@MarineScoutSniper - 11.05.2021 08:13

The Russians ran and we let them. 😂

Ответить
@jmsmaxwell
@jmsmaxwell - 17.05.2021 08:20

Sounds more like they Russians had a "Wet Dream". only way would be if they were running home at max speed and
the F35's were satisficed that there was not threat an they were not to pursue.

Ответить
@tshavfengvang7831
@tshavfengvang7831 - 18.05.2021 14:08

Russian media intentionally did this to save face even though knowingly they got caught red handed. Defense 101: Never show your vulnerability to others.

Ответить
@Ubereme
@Ubereme - 20.05.2021 12:25

When they claim all these thing they never quote correct facts. Take into account if its carrying weapons as if it was the weight changes its top speed and range. Just look up the combat figures and then it shows how much rubbish from the propaganda mupputs is being stated. And it's all a mute point due to the misses that would be fired will go faster than the TU 160 could ever fly. Russian technology is badly maintained so the TU160 would probably brake down if used against a real energy lol

Ответить
@melvinmelvin8577
@melvinmelvin8577 - 24.05.2021 07:53

I mean, 4 engine vs 1! It supposes to outrun it!

Ответить
@JeffBourke
@JeffBourke - 25.05.2021 14:13

The Chinese people who read and believe the wording in these recaps... you have to wonder.

Ответить
@sultanmehmoodghaznavi6312
@sultanmehmoodghaznavi6312 - 01.06.2021 02:12

I saw that video. I was looking for it again and found this one. TU-160 turned on after burners and disappeared. the scene was spectacular!

Ответить
@mt5144
@mt5144 - 20.06.2021 01:00

If the TU 160 would have outrun a F.35 , The 160 would last about 10-15 mins in full afterburner before it called Bingo Fuel.

Ответить
@bucketman7984
@bucketman7984 - 13.07.2021 23:41

1 TU-160 engine is atleast stronger than 2 f35 engines. And it has 4 of em...
The TU-160 Has litrally equiped with rocket boosters .

Ответить
@tupolev.designs
@tupolev.designs - 30.11.2021 06:30

they can definetly outrun an f35, but yeah it is an animation, the tupelovs pilots wont even realise though that were being tracked until the interceptors are legit on their tail or beside them

Ответить
@EC-it2fx
@EC-it2fx - 05.04.2022 05:32

Ya spelled “interpret” in the title and said it in the intro too… is this a mis-wording for “intercept” ?

Ответить
@byronbailey9229
@byronbailey9229 - 26.08.2023 01:47

Can’t outrun missiles!

Ответить
@angeldomingojr.7538
@angeldomingojr.7538 - 21.05.2024 00:45

F-35's don't need to race that Russky crap let aim-120 do the trick..this only show how scared the dumb Russkies were..besides Russian claim is no different with Chinese claim...faking and hyping everything to save their shameless faces,,,,

Ответить