Комментарии:
Trump needs a major conflict to maintain the power of the $
ОтветитьEurope gave the world it's first two world wars and is working on a third.
ОтветитьJohn forgets that the biggest baddest kid in the playground is often the most cowardly n afraid kid too. N we teach kids not to be the bully. That it’s not the right way to be. It’s childish.
ОтветитьMost of these comments, are buffoons who mix emotion and value with describing how the world actually works.
Incidentally, economists are often foolish in regards to understanding politics. Sachs worldview doesnt work outside the years of 1991 to 2022.
America spreads its military power everywhere because of money… especially by selling weapons into wars
ОтветитьMr Sachs seems to be the only futuristic orientated cooperative person. All the rest seems to be in fear agression and in the past. Unfortunately.
ОтветитьThe growth of China is develloping a kind of paranoia in the head of many people, specially the Americans. Yes, they don´t want to loose his power for others, but this question is written in history books. All the superpower civilisations have his time of growth and decadence. Is like nature. You born, you live as much as you can and you die. Period.
ОтветитьWell, Mr.Dr.Prf. Jeffrey Sachs, I am SCHOCKED, THAT EVEN YOUR SOO CALLED " FRIEND ",
DOESN'T KNOW A CLUE ABOUT HOW IS FUNCTIONING
NOWDAYS THIS SWIFT OF POWERS ! USA Empire is GONE, like Mr. President PUTIN said, you want or not, China will BE,. The Next Hegemony Country ! And they Deserve it, because they have worked Hard, to be Number One on This Planet !!! Soo, sorry, again Mr. Jeffrey, but Pure and Simple, 7.0 Billion of People, don't wanna anymore to be treated as Vassals, ( Second Hand People ), from Nato ! As the danger of a Nuclear War, its very obvious, and clear as pure water that the real Threat,is coming from Nato ! But I do TRUST my dear Friends, from other Galaxies who are watching 24/7 the USA, that they Will never allow them to use the Nukes !!! Why ??? Because this All Planet, does not belong to the Homo Sapiens, but to other very highly Intelligent Civilizations !!! """ I don't know if this Universe is Infinite, but I do know that Stupidity is Infinite !"""- Albert Einstein.
""" One true believer of God, worth, much more than thousands of unbelievers in true God !!!"""- New Testament.
What both of them get wrong is a fundamental understanding that by its very nature and foundation, the US is fundamentally isolationist by design and intention from its very origin! Indeed most Americans could care less about matters outside our borders unless it threatens us, but when threatened, we are an unstoppable force for good. The danger is not that the US seeks conquer. We could easily have done so after WWII if we wanted to. The danger for the world that neither one of these so called experts understand, is that the US public is sick of sacrificing for an ungrateful world. The danger is that the US withdraw to our own borders, stop all foreign and military aid, be more prosperous than ever, stop disadvantageous trade, be energy independent, and let the tyrants of the world do as they will as long as they dont threaten us directly. Dont think that’s realistic in this global trade era? Think again, the US alone has the raw materials, intellect, resources and industrial and military might to simply withdraw to its own borders and let the world fend for itself. In fact the US would undoubtedly prosper even more. It nearly happened in WWI and WWII but we wisely took a stand. Listening to these two, I now wonder why.
ОтветитьWhat both of them get wrong is a fundamental understanding that by its very nature and foundation, the US is fundamentally isolationist by design and intention from its very origin! Indeed most Americans could care less about matters outside our borders unless it threatens us, they we are an unstoppable force for good. The danger is not that the US seeks conquer. We could easily have done so after WWII if we wanted to. The danger for the world that neither one of these so called experts understand, is that the US public is sick of sacrificing for an ungrateful world. The danger is that the US withdraw to our own borders, stop all foreign and military aid, be more prosperous than ever, trade only in the Americas, be energy independent, and let the tyrants of the world do as they will as long as they dont threaten us directly. Dont think that’s realistic in this global trade era? Think again, the US alone has the raw materials, intellect, resources and industrial and military might to become a very prosperous, probably the most prosperous nation on the planet.
ОтветитьThe room full of warmoger except jeff
ОтветитьImagine if the World's two Superpowers make PEACE.....then instead of spending Taxpayers money on Weapons of Death and Destruction ,.....the funds were spent on improving the Quality of Life for all your own Citizens..... that's called a ' WIN WIN ' for HUMANITY !!....🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
ОтветитьThat Jeffrey lives in fantasy land. He is so full of bullahit
ОтветитьJohn is hardcore imperialist snob.
ОтветитьJeffrey, you could tell John at the end that there is no any fact proving that China ever did this to other entities in the world even when they were (for so long) biggest civilation and economical power in the region. Unlike US who's behavior was always to poke and cut the wings of whomever tried to rise. Even in a such short time from their existence.
The best ruthless fight for the power and hegemony was from within. Wild West, land grabbing, gold rush and stealing, banditism, etc is embedded in the ... nation.
The infantile idea that the US is a permanent superpower cuz of its economic might and any country that comes close to the US’s economy is a threat is ludicrous. History says otherwise
ОтветитьIf USA government were not so racist and love it's roots so much at a point that literally USA is maintaining Europe countries with Americas money. Meaning live America money in America from North Pole to Argentina rockies. The gold is from America the friuts and good are from America keep prosperity in America South and North don't take it to Europe they don't have anything to offer. USA worries China won't take America continent goods then start making America a prosperity continent for all not only for European descendents.
ОтветитьThe silence after Jeffrey Sachs talked about what he was truly afraid of…it is quite common sense; and what I think he meant in his response is that he’s afraid the U.S. is the imprudent country which would actually start this.
ОтветитьThis is hilarious… really. Will China cause WWIII ? No. But, the USA or Israel : yes more likely.
ОтветитьGood show 👍🏻
ОтветитьAmerica is becoming a rouge state unwilling to comply with international organizations such as the UN and the ICC and refusing to engage in diplomacy with china and Russia, instead perfering to engage in propaganda against china who are not at war with anyone, unlike the US which is constantly bogged down in forever proxy wars in other countries where thousands including children are being slaughtered despite calls from the international community including China to end these conflicts through diplomacy however the US government remains opposed to a peaceful solution through dialogue and international law which might threaten it's hegemony.
Ответить2 approach to a single issue, interesting that people who don’t need to put on a uniform and go to the front line will advocate for war, as Jeff understands it’s the kids who’s going to pay for the price, and China is no Russia, it will absolutely go head to head with US and set the world back 100 years…
ОтветитьUsa is causing all conflicts
ОтветитьTaiwan .. is 100ks of the Chinese coast ... People are mainland Chinese ... The west needs to but out.. and I'm a pro westerner
ОтветитьMore likely the USA
ОтветитьSince when poses China a threat? In every sector where they challenge the US, dumb US politics provided an opening for them. It is not their fault to accep these "invitations". The threat is the US with her screwed economic and foreign policies, as well as with Trump's hegemony.
Ответитьlets put this away, when will we go to Mars, its 2025 now, tik tok tik tok, im slowly dying.
ОтветитьMearsheimer is a warmonger. He said it himself. US has managed to destroy past empires (due to luck, circumstance and power)
ОтветитьWesterners always ask stupid questions
ОтветитьFact: The USA lives at the expense of the exploitation of the rest of the world, its standard of living is artificially maintained by the monopoly position of the dollar in the world payment system (which allows USA to borrow endlessly, which is then credited by the rest of the world) and does not represent the actual productivity of the American economy. In this sense, it is no surprise that the largest expenditure of the USA is the military budget, because it is the only way to maintain world supremacy and the high standard of living of Americans, which is not based on economic performance. Military expenditure (% of GDP) in United States was reported at 3.4549 % in 2022 which means by leaps and bounds the highest military budget in the world. And why? Does the USA feel threatened by Mexico, Canada...? No, the USA needs this budget to maintain its hegemony and rob the rest of the world in order to get cheap natural resources and especially oil. US aircraft carriers are not in such numbers in all the seas of the world due to tourist trips, that's for sure...
ОтветитьIt’s a well known historical fact that China has never in history try to take over another country or try to dominate another region. They have fought civil wars and some against their neighbors, but never against another country with the intention to conquer and take over. I really believe they prioritize improving their own country and wellbeing of their people, and not trying to bring another country down. If the US push them to their limit, they might actually start to retaliate and that will not look good for the world and humankind
ОтветитьTwo great minds! Thanks for the civil discussion. Jeff tried honestly and sincerely to help the Soviet Union but tasted defeat bluntly because of the u.s. government! He is deeply disturbed since then…!
ОтветитьIts already started by america by killing thousands in middle east.....
ОтветитьWhen Mearsheimer speaks of "US security," he means "US hegemony." He's afflicted with the Anglo-Saxon delusional belief that they have an inviolable right to forever rule the world.
ОтветитьThe fact that they can’t see that the great agricultural areas like Europe, Eastern China, South Asia, the Eastern US etc. need to be regional hegemonies to defend their citizens which will each be in the billions at some point is alarming. Huge fertile regions are the sources of GDP majorities in their regions and each separately must rule their areas, whether directly or indirectly. That is the only way to balance the field of eight players.
ОтветитьI am with Sachs!
ОтветитьI'm a huge fan of both of these men! However, in this discussion i have to totally side with Jeffrey Sachs. You can talk about the oceans that separate us, but this world is a small planet getting smaller by the day. We need to stop thinking of others as rivals and star thinking as fellow humans that share the same planet. No one power has the right to rule the rest of us and the planet. By doing this, we can stop spending all of our effort and time on weapons of war and start spending those resources on making this planet a better place to live.
ОтветитьHow can you demonstrate the unprecedented military build up that China has pursued over the past 5-10 years and not perceive China as a threat? If there not a threat then why have they hacked so many plans of high end flight, missile and ground force weapons systems in all the major military branches. To the economist on the panel I would say, “the greatest deception men suffer from is their own opinions.”
ОтветитьJohn's mindset is going to be the downfall of the US.
ОтветитьFunny thing is China isn't even thinking about the hegemon thing. They simply are for prosperity.
Ответитьjm an idiotic mentality hawk of 4ever usa hegemony. nothing great about him. js real gung ho against 5 idiots. sorryvto b blunt. usa hegemony is doom
ОтветитьIf there are people like Jeffrey sachs in the world, we would have a better world, peaceful world, and more harmonious world. Look, some of them are so educated but fully disturbed mind . And they want to implement their war mongers mind to rule the world. Then where the peace comes from? They don't include the world. They think they are separate from others. Still not quite develop mind. When the disaster strike in their family or children, then only their mind will change.. it takes time. I hope the disaster doesn't happen to anyone. ❤❤
ОтветитьI’m Singaporean, no, it’s not true China. will never started a war!! History shows is an American obsession more than China, just make sure that everybody has a roof And something to eat every day.
ОтветитьThe USA is the problem. They don’t like the rise of China and they will force a war in time, just like they do with anyone who questions their hegemony.
ОтветитьWhy u are treathen U are superior fear for nothing
ОтветитьFear then I fight with my 6 generation fighter
ОтветитьRascal & thief are always fear & jealous other hard working intiligent success of china. They want to sanction & stop other to be rich & better lives
ОтветитьDon’t worry. The US is already doing that
ОтветитьJohn is a psychopath, I really think he needs to seek medical help
ОтветитьMearsheimer frames conflict as inevitable, drawing from a "realist" perspective shaped by centuries european of war. Sachs offers a more nuanced view, recognising China’s focus on stability, trade, and long-term vision. I don’t think China would push for conflict as it goes against the harmony they seek. Understanding China's history and cultural mindset reveals that conflict is not a foregone conclusion. With thoughtful engagement and mutual respect, there is a path toward coexistence and shared progress.
Ответить