Did the CIA oust Australia’s Prime Minister?

Did the CIA oust Australia’s Prime Minister?

Mr M History

3 месяца назад

115,949 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@TheLunatrick
@TheLunatrick - 27.10.2024 11:10

It started in a McDonalds...

Ответить
@noondayaxeman4668
@noondayaxeman4668 - 27.10.2024 20:11

Ah yes the USA runs Australia. But who runs the USA? They have a little country inside Rome...

Ответить
@somedumbozzie1539
@somedumbozzie1539 - 28.10.2024 00:03

Whitlam was sacked by the Australian people in a landslide electoral victory in which they lost 30 of the 60 seats they held.

Ответить
@paulsandford3345
@paulsandford3345 - 28.10.2024 04:26

If they did, I say thank you on behalf of all Australians! Now can you do the same with albo?

Ответить
@stevemoore6164
@stevemoore6164 - 28.10.2024 19:40

All these apologists for P.O.S Whitlam
Despite either that the 1976 election in which he led the ALP the Australian electorate confirmed that Kerr was right in dismissing by voting the LNPin a landslide
These apologists don’t mention that Whitlam cosied up to the worst mass murderer in human history Mao ze dong
He signed the Lima agreement solely so he could have access to underage Peruvian boys he was well known kiddy fiddler like others in his government
He wrecked the Australian economy he gave us high inflation that took 20 years
To get under control
He began the process of selling Australia off
He was the grub who began flooding Australia with Islamic middle eastern scum
You can also start with the dip S..ts he had as fellow ministers in his government stating with Jim Caines
He was the worst prime Miinistet Australia had until Albonese came along
If the CIA did remove they did Australia a favour

Ответить
@robertwalker7924
@robertwalker7924 - 29.10.2024 08:26

Witlam gave West Papua to the Indonesian invaders and mass murderers...unforgivable Gough

Ответить
@glennblanchard4193
@glennblanchard4193 - 29.10.2024 08:38

Who cares?

Ответить
@maypoole5854
@maypoole5854 - 29.10.2024 09:01

Australia needs to be a republic. As someone who was born and raised here, this whole ordeal is taught completely differently to what the facts point to. You get taught that the government got ‘dissolved because no bills were getting passed’.

Ответить
@jamesmuntz386
@jamesmuntz386 - 29.10.2024 17:17

Sloppy historical analysis with several factial errors and a number of cherry-picked assumptions to build a flimsy conspiracy theory.

Ответить
@jamesroper5571
@jamesroper5571 - 29.10.2024 23:47

Not only did they overthrow the Whitlam government they also killed Prime Minister Harold Holt, who was totally against the building of the Pine gap Spy Base, once he was out of the way it was built. The U.S. is not our friend or ally. We have been stupid enough to follow them into every war based on lies and propaganda, it’s time to wake up and oust our corrupt politicians who have sold their souls to the devil and regain our independence

Ответить
@AlbertoCowburn
@AlbertoCowburn - 30.10.2024 03:57

Ousy him 🤣🤣🤣 they fucken murdered him dude, it's what happens when you don't tow the line.

Ответить
@cranegantry868
@cranegantry868 - 30.10.2024 04:30

Nope. CIA didn't get rid of him, in an overwhelming landslide never seen before in Australia, the Australian people VOTED him out of office and got rid of his commie chums too.

Ответить
@chrisbarker3034
@chrisbarker3034 - 30.10.2024 13:07

If they did then it is the one and only decision they got right

Ответить
@daveb3987
@daveb3987 - 31.10.2024 12:13

Whitlam didn't see Fraser in the waiting room - that's what makes it all the more devious. Please look into the history books a little more closely about events on that day - because Kerr's actions here really highlight that it was wrong.

Had Whitlam spotted him, he'd have been able to turn around and leave before being sacked - and then he could have sacked Kerr by simply contacting the palace. Kerr was very particular about not letting Fraser be seen, Fraser's driver was directed to park around the back otherwise Gough would have known straight away.

Whitlam went in thinking he was going to call a half-senate election. Kerr sacked him, deceptively.

Ответить
@gammonbunji9292
@gammonbunji9292 - 31.10.2024 12:22

lol

Ответить
@SirMint-yi9zc
@SirMint-yi9zc - 01.11.2024 12:46

is this channel moderate or biased?

Ответить
@darrylhalden1948
@darrylhalden1948 - 02.11.2024 10:19

..yes I think they played a major role...some Australian academic in recent years came back with a refuting ïnvestigation" ..cant recall who it was....I thought at the time it sounded like an attempt to turn a blind eye...but thats the only serious effort at the subject I can remember in public at least...the meek and mild in this case shall inherit an alliance..but when so much of your economic progress is predicated on a good relationship to one emrging power and your security is resting with the other established power..when cometh the existential crisis?

Ответить
@christopherharvie8716
@christopherharvie8716 - 03.11.2024 05:14

The path that should be followed is who was Tarith Khemlani?
Google him beyond a date of birth and death & his association with this situation there is nothing about him???
He pops out of nowhere when, unsolicited, line of credit is discussed with an Adelaide property developer Gerry Karidis. This man is known to Whitlam cabinet member Clyde Cameron. The amount offered is too much for Karidis to need at the time but sensing an opportunity for a finders fee, more in his comfort range. Ace as a go between. This line of credit dries up but the Khelmani “hears” of the Australian Government’s interest and starts say the can help them access billions.
Khelamni strings this process out for months on end.
Enough time for the process to be entrenched and then “uncovered”.
Was Khelmani a CIA plant. Look him up there’s very little to nothing in him. A lack of presence, where to the point where the identity for such a significant person to start to become questionable…
This is the sort of backdoor entrapment process you’d read in a La Cáree book. Not enough is known. It’s suspicious to say the least.

Ответить
@Mercury-Wells
@Mercury-Wells - 03.11.2024 13:02

Well, you sucked all the drama out of that

Ответить
@grantdenniston2839
@grantdenniston2839 - 05.11.2024 01:00

Gough opposed the establishment of the Pine Gap facility on Australian soil and look how that turned out !!

Ответить
@sithlordofoz
@sithlordofoz - 05.11.2024 13:47

No. He was punted by the electorate in the General Election of December 1975. Had he been re-elected by the voters he would have gone back to being PM - and we'd have had a new GG by Christmas.

Ответить
@dennisdmenace4664
@dennisdmenace4664 - 05.11.2024 14:36

Early 20s then and voted for the I'ts time labor slogan.....I can tell you Australians and Labor were in a spending and debt frenzy a bit like today. Gough had to go, he had no control over his team of MPs. Outside of that he really meant well, should have stuck to being a lawyer for the battlers.

Ответить
@audries5048
@audries5048 - 06.11.2024 04:03

So many wonderful legacy things provided by the Whitlam government - it is amazing to think they had such a short run. What would we have had if they had had a full term? 2 full terms? Our standard of living now is still largely thanks to Whitlam

Ответить
@sanelapasagic8477
@sanelapasagic8477 - 06.11.2024 08:57

The threat to Australians comes from Zionists.

Ответить
@peterjoel345
@peterjoel345 - 08.11.2024 15:32

That's it im becoming PM

Ответить
@kevindee4871
@kevindee4871 - 10.11.2024 10:32

Any Australian under 65 years of age who acts appalled at ALL by this unsubstantiated fantasy is nothing but an ABSOLUTE moron, a product of this revisionist age. You weren't there to see the state of decay our nation was then suffering, GENERAL strikes, NO petrol, NO electricity half the time as INFLATION kept climbing (10-15% annually) as we headed to bankruptcy. 1972 and "it was time" for the MOST inept, corrupt, straight out stupid government this nation had till Kevin 07's equally appalling arrival. And ALL those children feigning rage for Gough's thankful sacking, precisely ONE month after he went back to the electorate and was massacred by the Australian people. Similar to what will soon happen to Mr 32% primary vote Albo and his delusional clowns as he buys himself a waterfront mansion whilst you ALL howl. 🤣😂😅,

Ответить
@sunriseboy4837
@sunriseboy4837 - 12.11.2024 14:11

In an iterview, Arthur Calwell was asked, "What's the difference bet. the Labour Party, and the Liberal Party".
AC: "If you took two empty bottles, and labelled one Labour, and the other Liberal, that would be the extent of the difference."

Ответить
@allanpendrick420nm8
@allanpendrick420nm8 - 14.11.2024 01:48

And all this led to us having a "paper" King of Australia. look at Hawks Australia act. He finished off Whitlams dirty work. Our media lied to us then, and they lie to us now.

Ответить
@craighodgson6056
@craighodgson6056 - 22.11.2024 01:29

Do Australians just play the voice with prime ministers? What's with these crazy jingles in their political ads lol?

Ответить
@gavinharding9270
@gavinharding9270 - 22.11.2024 10:38

to be americas enemy is dangerous. to be her friend is lethal

Ответить
@jamesmccann355
@jamesmccann355 - 23.11.2024 02:00

This is why the Commonwealth must be Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. And unite and get rid of American interference in our nations. This is achievable. America is not your allie....AMERICA IS THE BIGGEST TO YOUR COUNTRY!

Ответить
@keithad6485
@keithad6485 - 30.11.2024 22:38

All referendums are about increases in power - with few exceptions.

Ответить
@keithad6485
@keithad6485 - 30.11.2024 22:40

This dude is wrong, Whitlam changed the national anthem only after a plebescite, similar to a referendum. I am Aussie and I think our national anthem Advance Australia Fair is weak, insipid and I have never sung it. Most Aussie I know, don't know the words.

Ответить
@keithad6485
@keithad6485 - 30.11.2024 22:55

1932 sacking of Lang nearly caused a civil war? Rubbish. Where is this uploaders evidence. No one on the streets with guns. Lots of unsupported claims in this vid.

Ответить
@liquidh5226
@liquidh5226 - 14.12.2024 08:11

Subscribed

Ответить
@cloobs1
@cloobs1 - 17.12.2024 00:31

I f&*k it up and its everyone else's fault...the left in a nutshell

Ответить
@APP1E5
@APP1E5 - 21.12.2024 23:34

CIA? Harold Holt! Shark? I dont think so, Australia had begun withdrawal from Vietnam before Whitlam. Although Holt Initiated Pine Gap, there were allegedly questions on the operation outside the lease.
"As of the 2022-2023 financial year, foreign entities owned approximately 13% of Australia's agricultural land, with the United States holding about 0.7% of this total.
FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW BOARD

In terms of overall foreign investment, the United States is Australia's largest foreign investor, accounting for approximately 25% of total foreign investment, equating to around AUD 1.09 trillion.
U.S. EMBASSY AUSTRALIA

These figures highlight the significant role of U.S. interests in both agricultural land ownership and broader economic investments within Australia."

Ответить
@dumdumbrown4225
@dumdumbrown4225 - 23.12.2024 07:45

Awesome video mate 👌🏽 would you consider doing one about how American interests toppled the Rudd Government by generously funding Gillard’s faction to undermine Rudd?

Ответить
@troybeecroft7729
@troybeecroft7729 - 25.12.2024 13:24

Offering to buy isn’t threatening to invade and take over.. Denmark is jumping at shadows. At least their now getting some shiny new toys lol 😂

Ответить
@jw-vx8im
@jw-vx8im - 26.12.2024 13:48

South Koreans recently stood up against American political interference.

Ответить
@Michael-r1x5h
@Michael-r1x5h - 28.12.2024 19:55

If they are still up on 'Wikileaks', have a look at the cables from the U.S. embassy in Canberra to the U.S. Department of State during the 'dismissal period' in Australia.
They indicate that the U.S. still regarded Australia as being in the British Sphere of influence and in effect still owned by the banks in London. They regarded Fraser and Whitlam as untalented political mediocracies of little consequence to American interests.
The banks in the 'old country' that essentially owned 'Australia' however were genuinely concerned when Whitlam's Minerals and Energy Minister Rex Connor sought to loan money elsewhere for what amounted to an attempt to 'buy back the farm'. They would certainly have wanted the Whitlam govt. 'gone'. The Crown, the Governor General and Malcolm Fraser would have had awareness of their concerns. In the end a threat to block supply gave the Governor General a situation to dissolve the Parliament and have an 'early election'.
Although at the time there were people saying it was a CIA 'plot', over the years it perhaps was thought to be prudent by the actual perpetrators to continually shift the blame on to the Americans. (Everyone hates Americans!)

Ответить
@Michael-r1x5h
@Michael-r1x5h - 28.12.2024 20:32

Threadneedle Street has everyone fooled to this day. (Like almost anything - follow the money!!!)

Ответить
@pouwakaruwhiu8349
@pouwakaruwhiu8349 - 01.01.2025 08:09

It's never too late to remove America from Pine Gap, Australians stand up and save our country from the American oligarchs, from Qld 🦘

Ответить
@Melbournelost66
@Melbournelost66 - 02.01.2025 09:34

Whitlam and his government were a bunch of BUFFOONS! This old chestnut that the CIA orchestrated the sacking of the Whitlam government is classic ALP denial of their shocking performance in government. Whitlam appointed Sir John Kerr, believing he was a good Labor man. So good Gough thought in his supreme arrogance, that Sir John would take orders and be a good boy for Gough. The problem was, that this government was amateurish to say the least. Rex Connor, incompetent, Jim Cairns a total embarrassment. The Kimlani affair, on and on it goes. Cairns involved himself in all sorts of shenanigans. Over the years I've observed many young ALP students thinking Whitlam was some sort of great leader who was unjustly treated. The truth is, Gough was a great speaker but an average operator, as were his very inexperienced highly Socialist team. They got found out in the end. As for the CIA theory, the US had bigger fish to fry....the whole suggestion they were somehow involved is an embarrassment.

Ответить
@mmmoroi
@mmmoroi - 03.01.2025 00:50

Whitlam had literally a stature of a statesman having implemented many policies under his own initiative. His dismissal by the authority of the Governor General was, albeit in compliance with the provision of the Constitution, considered as brutal denial of democracy in Australia, whereafter perception of the arrangement of the Commonwealth was no longer the same. It ought to be reminded that the Japanese PM Kakuei Tanaka, Whitlam's comtemporary was overthrown by an ariticle accusing his funding scandal in an influential weekly magazine reputedly based on the intelligence obtained from the CIA. Not a few believed that his visit to Beijing under his own initiative for normalising diplomatic relationship between Japan and China incurred wrath of the then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. 15 months after his resignation as PM, Tanaka was politically snuffed once and for all in the midst of the Lockheed payoff scandal, which was legally one of the most dubious by any standard. Witlam's dismissal may well have been engineered by the same bunch of people who expelled Tanaka. So this headline seems spot on. Undoubtedly Whitlam started his initiative for improving the Australia-China diplomatic tie without bothering to consult with Kissinger beforehand. "No surprise" is one of the critical principles they impose on whom they unilaterally regard as subordinate.

Ответить
@AussieCarnivoreRunner
@AussieCarnivoreRunner - 06.01.2025 03:06

US AUS CORP

Ответить
@dancinguy99
@dancinguy99 - 10.01.2025 02:48

More leftist nonsense. Law caysed that fool his dismissal as in our constitution. Here's the gr8 thing in Australia...WE the people coukd have voted thise shitheads back IN, but WE gad enough of Labor's disgusting nonsense, do WE fired the filth! Grow up, you lefty idiots.

Ответить