Комментарии:
The problem with using concrete is that it’s production produces a lot of carbon dioxide gas currently. Other than that very nice as well as interesting.
ОтветитьI wish you success
ОтветитьI don’t understand.. what is keeping 3D printed houses from being an affordable alternative to traditionally manually (primitively) built houses?
Ответитьcan this work for inground pools
Ответитьget the hell out of the way
Ответитьno one should be homeless in 2021 and technology shows its the governments and red taped regulations and tax's are the reason why we have housing crises around the world, because bottom line too many chiefs not enough Indians is the saying, time is now we have new generation that doesn't care about pockets but want innovate a better world, I am in middle of bringing it to Australia as a healthy competitor as we have no regulations as yet but sure they find a reason to stop this great innovation and charge us younger gens from letting it happen. this is future and hope world comes together and changes construction industry save planet and people money as realistic value of a home is not millions of dollars as people make it out to be.
Ответитьyou mentioned SG80 in reference to regulations in the US. Do you have any more information on this? I am having a hard time finding anything.
ОтветитьNice!! I would like to see more earth "cob type" material. Good job with the standard ABB robot
ОтветитьInteresting pattern on that.
ОтветитьThere's been a number of new & interesting construction innovations in NZ and they all have definite benefits for NZ Houses but as history has proven, it will get gazzumped by the NZ Building Code & the way individual councils administer the Building Act. The issue is its not an 'Acceptable Solution' so will need to be processed as an 'Alternative Solution' and that means a lot of hoops to jump through eg. B1 Structure & complying with earthquake code as cant see how reinf steel can be incorporated, B2 Durability - councils views new technology as a liability risk with main criteria being what if the technology fails. The big issue though is E2 External Moisture and compliance with weathertightness including the windows install as there are no flashings in this technology.
Expect at least 6 months+ in endless council processing.
its really2 3D printing of an object,just like --same as Robotics doing automotive works in assembly line//. we Only use 3D printing"" On Paper ""Geophysical Results way back 1986; couldnt wait till it done in Constructions.
ОтветитьI wonder how they added the steel reinforcements
Ответить