Google FORCED to Sell Off Chrome! DOJ Might BUST THEM UP?!

Google FORCED to Sell Off Chrome! DOJ Might BUST THEM UP?!

Clownfish TV

4 часа назад

19,694 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@foxylover9250
@foxylover9250 - 24.11.2024 10:18

The thing is, they had to find a way to shove Breadtube down everyone's throats somehow, unfortunately due to Google being a private company dealing with its clientele (that being the far left of course) they won't face any legal reprecussions once they uncensor the rest of us.

Ответить
@laidoffjournalist
@laidoffjournalist - 24.11.2024 10:19

Yes, destroy Google. We need more millionaires, and less billionaires.

Ответить
@rachellight1186
@rachellight1186 - 24.11.2024 10:21

This is why I have a Samsung phone cause they have their own internet search engine on all their devices.

Ответить
@LrdBxRck
@LrdBxRck - 24.11.2024 10:23

The fact that Clownfish don't consider themselves "Of The Right" is almost mind blowing. I've listened to them for some time now and their stance in the culture war(Disney) puts them in that camp 100%.

Ответить
@UnnamedUno22
@UnnamedUno22 - 24.11.2024 10:26

I'd love to see X buy Chrome!

Ответить
@L_mattox
@L_mattox - 24.11.2024 10:31

An early Christmas present, from Uncle Sam!

Ответить
@alphamike87
@alphamike87 - 24.11.2024 10:35

Google should be broken up and more usable search engines/browsers should be developed

Ответить
@futureshockxl
@futureshockxl - 24.11.2024 10:36

The the 80s we have the Baby Bells, now we're gonna get the Gerber Googles.

Ответить
@m.f.r.5827
@m.f.r.5827 - 24.11.2024 10:41

Google is garbage

Ответить
@LoknAtstuf
@LoknAtstuf - 24.11.2024 10:44

LMFAO

GOOGLE AND CHROME

SCHEME TO SELL OFF CHROME TO SPLIT IT INTO 2 TOMAKE TWICE THE MONEY?

GOOGLE MUST OF BRIBED THE DOI TO FORCE IT TO BREAK UP

MIGHT AS WELL MAKE MICROSOFT SELL OFF I.E.

LOL

WHAT ABOUT APPLE SELLING OFF IT'S OS?

LOL

TALK ABOUT DUMB BECOMING DUMB-ER (MORE DUMB)

EACH GENERATION ... LOL ... JUST LOSES A FEW MORE BRAIN CELLS.

Ответить
@nowherebrain
@nowherebrain - 24.11.2024 10:44

this mentality that trump is far right is just crazy, most of his supporters are also not far right..I was always democrat, voted for biden...until now...people label me as being far right, when really the line shifted...not the people.

Ответить
@jessicakeethler8633
@jessicakeethler8633 - 24.11.2024 10:48

The censorship and dirty tricks are easy to fix.
Amend the CDA, section 230.
Require a declaration from them.
They get to Register as a Carrier and enjoy the protections of CDA 230 but they have ZERO control of user content or interactions... including censorship, editing, "clarification" where they paste what they require you to believe over your video...
They get no DMCA automated system... somebody wants a legal fight they don't get to do it from the shadows.

They get a hold button... for removal of illegal content.
Use of this feature constitutes an actionable accusation with recourse if they're wrong.
They get no button for someone losing an argument on a public forum...
As a public forum, it becomes a town square venue.

EXCLUSIVE OR...

They register as a PUBLISHER and have complete editorial control AND responsibility for the content of their their site...
They become subject to vicarious defamation, CSAM, and the petty conflicts of their users.

In neither case do they enjoy the comfort of binding arbitration for any violation that meets a criminal threshold or federal civil tort.
They're free to arbitrate petty squabbles between users but not actions that invoke criminal prosecution or federal tort for financial damage.

Gasp!
They get to do business in the same reality the rest of us do.
Where they are either a Carrier who passes through user speech for which the user is responsible OR they get to act as a publisher in which they get complete control AND complete responsibility...

They don't get to pick and choose which they wish to hide behind.
They REGISTER as one or the other and they are held to that registration, with statutory penalties for violations.
Statutory penalties to be paid to users damaged by their abuse.
Failure to pay Penalties within a statutory time limit, invokes a multiplier and a new time limit... subject to lien and foreclosure under civil statute.

Ответить
@toddnolastname4485
@toddnolastname4485 - 24.11.2024 10:49

Does Chrome in this situation include the Chrome OS?

But what browser will they include on Android?

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:53

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:53

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@rpmgrlca
@rpmgrlca - 24.11.2024 10:56

Google was awesome when it was new.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:56

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:57

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:57

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@jonathanlanglois2742
@jonathanlanglois2742 - 24.11.2024 10:58

They do need to be busted up, or at the very least, they need to be severely reprimanded and fined. They are abusing their market position to lockdown addon features that they have deemed undesirable.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:59

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:59

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@susandolan9543
@susandolan9543 - 24.11.2024 10:59

Chrome is 💩 anyway so no great loss.

Ответить
@wizdumb_and_valor
@wizdumb_and_valor - 24.11.2024 11:00

lol i use fire fox🖤

Ответить
@monsterslurpee7212
@monsterslurpee7212 - 24.11.2024 11:02

No more outro?

Ответить
@Smdjrjj
@Smdjrjj - 24.11.2024 11:06

Chrome should be given to Microsoft

Ответить
@Taiko206
@Taiko206 - 24.11.2024 11:09

Haven't used Google for years, Always went straight to DuckDuckGo, even on my phone

Ответить
@jub8891
@jub8891 - 24.11.2024 11:09

why chrome? google have like thousands of services they could sell of..it seems pretty specific..

Ответить
@BR7Fan71
@BR7Fan71 - 24.11.2024 11:13

what good is selling chrome? its still using google search

Ответить
@CTomCooper
@CTomCooper - 24.11.2024 11:17

In the late 70’s, the US government didn’t break up airline companies. It instead deregulated, and market competition met demand. Between the likes of IP laws and government regulations on underground lanes for ISPs, big tech is so encumbered by government monitoring that of course only big tech companies being the highest bidder with congressional lobbyists would stand to benefit. Breaking up something is only temporary when the policies that exist by top executives in said big companies still influence an industry.

Ответить
@kyledabearsfan
@kyledabearsfan - 24.11.2024 11:18

good! the government has been far too relaxed on anti-trust. I dont like the government having much power, but anti-trust should be one of their main priorities.

Ответить
@Hammerhead547
@Hammerhead547 - 24.11.2024 11:18

General Motors dropped google car play from their entire company lineup because they got sick of google ripping them off.

Ответить
@AstroTibs
@AstroTibs - 24.11.2024 11:19

I'm no huge fan of Google, but they're not a monopoly because they drove out or bought up all the competition—they're a monopoly because their competitors are incompetent.

There's a difference between breaking up a runaway powerhouse, and punishing a company for being peerless at what they do.

Ответить
@pelinoregeryon6593
@pelinoregeryon6593 - 24.11.2024 11:24

Past time.

Ответить
@byronrodriguez8974
@byronrodriguez8974 - 24.11.2024 11:24

Microsoft should be forced to sell off Windows as they are the ones with a Monopoly.

Ответить
@xcelron1580
@xcelron1580 - 24.11.2024 11:28

But I've been using Chrome for years. What's gonna happen to all my bookmarks?

Ответить
@WeAreHere-42
@WeAreHere-42 - 24.11.2024 11:29

Here's a novel idea...maybe the Government should stop giving corpo's special treatment via tax breaks, trade protectionism, government contracts, and regulatory favoritism .

Ответить
@reaperdragon4188
@reaperdragon4188 - 24.11.2024 11:32

Nothing that ticks me off more is avatars hiding being voices... no worst then AI ... stop hiding being filters.. be real

Ответить
@TheSleepLes
@TheSleepLes - 24.11.2024 11:34

Good.

Ответить
@reaperdragon4188
@reaperdragon4188 - 24.11.2024 11:38

Just rehashed information spoken by a Ai or avatar.... not very credible.. Just saying

Ответить
@tonyb6007
@tonyb6007 - 24.11.2024 11:39

This is long overdue. Looking forward to the break up.

Ответить
@reaperdragon4188
@reaperdragon4188 - 24.11.2024 11:39

Not original ... just looped and copied

Ответить
@elgoat3038
@elgoat3038 - 24.11.2024 11:40

Im guessing this is why they made purchasing books available through the Kindle app now

Ответить
@mrsmerily
@mrsmerily - 24.11.2024 11:40

Chrome is down the train anyway. People are moving on to other browser anyway... i hope something more important is broken away...

Ответить
@nathanielenochs1843
@nathanielenochs1843 - 24.11.2024 11:40

Google has been part of the Mediaopoly for over 18+ years

Ответить