Tim Bayne - Neurophilosophy vs. Neuromania?

Patricia Chuchland would dislike this video lol

Guys cover up his ignorante in brains funcions in baseless picture reality in brains. He doesnt knows Science and philosophy proceedings.

It’s the war between good and evil inside the mind. Who will deliver us? We need help! We can’t look to each other for help since since everyone has the same problem. Only our Creator can perfectly cover for us Himself and remake us again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can in a million years.

Every creation with blood has thought, breath, and footsteps. Once you start going beyond this paradigm, you will fall hard. The amount of power you exert walking correspond directly to your breath moving inward toward earth. In this continuous process, energy also lean into you going upward. Your thoughts during the aforementioned processes let great things to become available because it is in control letting out some great effects in you. Just as the earth has properties humans kill and steal for, so has the body of man to reach such great heights.

Whether or not this formula is right to you, I have come to the conclusion that humans are just greedy, wicked and ignorant, plus they will do anything to have limited advantage instead of supporting the progress of another to supplant real-time wisdom that last and can be passed to the younger generation. Have you ever asked yourself why mothers and babies are the through representation of what man must learn and grow from? Do you even ask or observe why the armed forces march than they run and jog during their training? Do you suppose that running and jogging do a better just like yeast on dough, instead of walking or marching? What do you understand and have applied regularly that balanced or let your thought have control over your breath and how long you did it for.

Brain connectomes

how might particles in brain recohere into quantum wave function?

Turn out the lights, folks; the party's over. 😴

This would seem to be a topic that should be looked at in more depth. Exactly how clear of a picture are the measurements we're making giving us of an understanding of the totality of what's going on?

to be fair: we are all in a kind of Neuromania now and maybe since the dawn of the I - due to the human hybris , but there is one eastern philosophy that does a(n) actively try to get rid off that on a daily basis...

You should consider interviewing Bernardo Kastrup.

Where's Cosmin?
Poor guy get the ban?

IQ + EQ + GUIDANCE = TRUTH

When the class ask the teacher weather not nor they could play baseball or not instead of learing or practice twice learn grammar of free mind then knowledge of God miserly if You leave You keys in the car how could You break the window and pop the truck of the car

how could we describe "experience" without been here walking the earth

I don't understand why this interview was published! The interviewee said nothing worth the effort of listening to him. It doesn't even leave memory on what to think. Robert L. Kuhn is getting lost in the labyrinth he has built for himself.

To paraphrase (update) Nietzsche, "Mind is Dead". 👍

What's under this tarp? Handwaving, and speculative buzzword neologisms based on brainscans

I’d say if Fmri images show activation durring certain processes (& we see a lack of said activity in people who can’t do x proceess) combined with stimulating that area having a certain effect and lesions or removing a part of the brain disrupting x process then we can honestly say there’s more than just correlation happening. For example I don’t think the amygdala just happens to correlate with someone ability to detect threats and entree fight or flight mode because we know people damaged amygdala’s have that aspect of themselves disrupted or that it’s size correlated with how aggressive and fearful different people are. I think ye dishonest to call that neuromania.

Neurophilosophy or Neuromania? Its Neurophenomenology (Embodied Cognition) for me

This is what you get for trying to explain the nature of consciousness through neuro philosophy.

I wanted to believe in CTT, i would like to have believed that CTT was a great source of Knowledge and information, but I just can not from the lack of spine all these modern men display - tis is a ship without a captin, without a due set course, going around in circles, lost at sea, the very problem that is democracy, when unscrupulous men think they compare and are equal to the great Philosopher's. These pseudo intellectuals believe that philosophers' paraphernalia, that being science, a tool which used for inquiry, somehow became a new aged cult for the bad men that are 'atheists' and 'materialist', in the sense of giving them grounds so to disseminate their anti life dogma, their anti God, ways of unpurposeful life, pointless living, that matter is the source; everything is mere chance and accidents.
What reason is there for giving respect to this series, the spineless men involved, which I really wanted to advocate and simply cannot because of the pseudo skeptical standards -- there isn't any. Listen, agnosticism is fine, and after 21 years you're still stuck at the bus stop than one must face the facts - either your teachers and colleagues are worthless or you allowed others to do the work for you thus you never went through the proper initiative rites so to 'see'.
And most importantly, because this series has influenced so many men of poor funds of knowledge, leaving them much more lost than found, I can not respect this here what is taking place.

I have a simple explanation for all what they are talking about, but laymen will call me a psychopath, all I need is a quantum science expert & a philosopher to tell them what I have learnt while undergoing a successful heart transplant surgery through which I have experienced the NDE phenomenon and learnt knowledge beyond my imagination ... Is anyone available?

I would love to talk to you about all the questions that have still been left unanswered; which should include all the important and fundamental ones 😁🙏

Start with Occam’s razor. Accept that you can’t cut butter with a knife made of butter. Then let’s examine our questions. Why are we still interested in so-called “free will.” Clearly, we like talking about it, so we won’t explain it away. But it is NOT Fermat’s Last Theorem which requires a proof. Since there isn’t anything else, mind and brain are different aspects of the same thing.

Like praying at the ancient temples of mystery, neurons have become the modern temples.

These are some great topics

I think our mentality is related to our morality not neurons.

I can’t say for sure… 🤔
But this might be the FUNNIEST comment section I’ve ever read ever.
😂
Thanks for all the laughs wether serious comments or not I enjoyed them all. ❤

could neural correlates measured in brain activity represent a recoherence of quantum probabilities?

I think it is important to realise that there are only the two extremes: outright materialism vs the existence of some immaterial aspect of consciousness. To any empiricist philosopher mind - specifically experience - is primary. We can’t say anything whatsoever about the world of science without being conscious. That is the Hard Problem for physicalism.

Chalk and cheese!
Neuroscience is the chalk, philosophy is the cheese.
Neuroscience explores and tries to explain human mind and behaviour from a physio/biological standpoint utilising the most up to date technology. Meanwhile, philosophy endeavours to ascertain the higher cognitive functions through reasoned 'logical' argument.
You may as well try to eat chalk and draw with cheese rather than attempt to marry these two incompatible approaches to come to an understanding of what mind is or how it functions holistically.

😏🙄🥴

No mention of spirit?

Do not stray from science. Other fields might inform science, but science should have the final say.