Комментарии:
Dr. Wolf even SAID “hitting the floor!” Not the ground… Ouf “From the trauma…” Dr. — I dissent.
ОтветитьI don't deny drinking a beer when shoveling snow. Jeeze. The dude made us sound like a bunch of drunks. Rude.
ОтветитьHappy Sunday Blessings DutyRon & Ed💙🙏
ОтветитьWell at least we can be sure the local police are likely not responsible for the JFK situation
ОтветитьNo one disputed he died as a result from injuries to the back of his head, he said he fell backwards that could be from a few things he said he sees it in people who slip when drunk
Ответитьhear from Torrington WY while doing spring cleanups on 4closed houses 4 Freddie Mac & fannie mae
ОтветитьI agree I caught that. Gravity. That was great for the defense
ОтветитьThe other thing were drunk and fell down
ОтветитьThis case is who's trying to fool who. Can you imagine what these jurors are thinking each time one of thm are caught in a lie. I'm sure there is someone in the jury know that this judge is bias.
ОтветитьAlways so glad to see you two 😊
ОтветитьIt was a koo koo katchu injury
ОтветитьSo I didn’t understand why the medical examiner didn’t rule his death a homicide until the doctor testified. I think his testimony alone is reasonable doubt.
ОтветитьWas Dr Wolf saying an animal came up to JO, while his brain was separated from his brain stem ? And had an auto response, while in vegetative state ???
ОтветитьI hate these missing children cases 😢
ОтветитьIt is very possible he simply fell because he was drinking and unsteady and fell with glass in hand and it got embedded in his face. As I say that a fall like that does not explain boxers rash and raccoon eyes.
ОтветитьWasn’t John found face down?
ОтветитьSo he fell in the light snow with that much force it ripped his back pocket and caused skid marks on his jeans and gave him a severve skull fracture ???? Then the police planted all the tail light in his clothes and around his body then took the car to the sally port and planted evidence . Then everyone in the house and the first resopnders all colluded together to make up a story about what happened that night and what karen said ???? Then they rigged the phone data to make sure it all lined up correctly with a collision and karen told her dad she thought she hit somthing etc etc etc Hmmm ... Think im missing something
ОтветитьDoing an amazing job covering this sham of a case, thank you Duty Ron & Ed, ive been recommending folks come over to cjeck out the break downs of evidence and how a professional court is supposed to be run. Anyone not sure needs to watch you guys, real deal calling out the BS! 🙌🫡🫡
❤💙❤️
Did he say the hit to the face was the originating injury?
ОтветитьIf I was watching this witness testify and didn’t know the background I wouldn’t know if this is a defence or a prosecution witness. He definitely didn’t prove the case of John being hit by the car. And I found his testimony very interesting at times captivating m.
ОтветитьJohn was beat up in the basement of the house
ОтветитьOnly, in the 911 call Jen made, she said they had "turned him over", so he didn't hit the ground on his back; he was face first in the snow.
ОтветитьMy husband got hit by a car (he’s 6ft 4 and weighs 23 stone ) The car was going no more than 15 miles an hour and his wrist was broken through his skin !! If johns arm was the point of impact at even 20 miles an hour by massive SUV my own brain process tells me his arm would have been shattered not just cut .
Ответитьl ❤ the recaps. I thought Dr W contradicted himself.
ОтветитьThese short clips are very helpful for sharing! Thank you.
ОтветитьI forgot until yesterday that Morrissey got up and gave that press conference several years ago. Are you fucking kidding? You wanna talk about painting in the jury pool good Lord
ОтветитьRon & ed where and what about all the blood from his head and wounds????
ОтветитьForce was linear from front to back with a coup contrecoup injury but that doesn’t explain temporal lobe injuries which he also had.
ОтветитьWhy are johns socks being hidden? Have Chloe dog hair on them?
ОтветитьThe defense Must bring up about the blood loss and where it was or wasn’t.
ОтветитьHow could John fly through the air and still hold on to his phone and cocktail glass and be found face down with a blunt trauma injury to the back of the head? Jen mcabe said he had a large contusion or swollen area over his right eye. If someone was backing up their car to hit a police officer don't you think he could jump out of the way?
ОтветитьNo car injury, not guilty.
ОтветитьHow can you fracture an artery?? you can fracture your skull but an artery!
ОтветитьReplay watch… totally awesome both of you. Thank you.
ОтветитьGreat defence witness!! I thought the CW was still presenting, why is there a defence witness on the stand?
ОтветитьJudge is scared Karen will be found innocent.
ОтветитьOh damn I missed s live again, thank you Duty Ron and Ed Wallace for explaining all of this mess because it is a Mess,We all shouldn't be hear and especially Karen Read this is a damn shame, Can't believe that they actually want us to believe all of the 🐂 they're putting in this case
ОтветитьNot necessarily! It depends on where he got hit. Obviously the head, which was a fatal injury. Yes they did find lots of evidence around John's body. For one thing lots of pieces of Karen's taillight. His sneaker was found and black cap and let's not forget his or Karen's drink glass that was taken away from her. The Forensic Data is not bias and don't lie. GUILTY without reasonable doubt for sure!
Ответитьsneaky Brennan trying to say the facial injuries were a result of the back of head injury
Ответитьwhat i don't understand is how he was found as described by jenn mccabe as they had to turn john over meaning from his stomach to his back so they could lay on him and try to generate heat yet this man says that he wouldn't have been able to move from front to back once these injuries occurred and if that's true then where did injuries occur.
Ответитьyes. he would've been damaged first on his legs. his legs would've impacted first
ОтветитьWe don't need a neurosurgeon period. How can anyone explain the slices on his arm? They don't line up with any slices in the arm of the sweatshirt. It's IMPOSSIBLE! And a car didn't do that.
ОтветитьThis doctor's testimony is completely irrelevant. his attitude and ego are a bit much he shoukd use his brain to tuck his Collar properly.
ОтветитьAfter the prosecutor has shown the clip in which Karen told aboout pulling a fragment of glass out of O'Keefes face i think he might suggest a theory like "she hit him with a cocktail glass into his face and he fell backwards." After all that guy who looks like a beaver (Brennan) is called a "special prosecutor" = either he parks on a handicap- spot or then he really pulls rabbits out of his hat. I dont know. Yes the case against Read is 100% bs and should have been deleted before the first trial but if there is a reason to try anyway = it makes me wonder who/what are they trying to hide so hard in the PD they just need a escapegoat so badly.
ОтветитьI would just like to add what if he was hit in the face then fell backwards. Mr Wolf can they cause the same injuries
ОтветитьThey still haven't explained where all the blood went from his head injury. Because it wasn't on the snow and ground they said. Because the ground should have been covered with that much blood from his head injury.
ОтветитьThe judge needs to be charge and arrested corruption in Canton Massachusetts.Karens car on sean had small pice now who thing smashed is this why brian was at P/D that night didn't move one car arround went inside came out why smashed light they killed john and the dog !
Ответить