Комментарии:
777x.9 is the winner for me as I am a big fan of the 777 family group
ОтветитьLol. I love the political correctness when speaking about the state of the 777x development.
ОтветитьOne which fly
ОтветитьWow!
I like that both are amazing!😊
A350 1000 ❤💕
ОтветитьSince B777X will be 10 YEARS newer than the A350 it must be ALOT better not just match the older design.
ОтветитьB777
ОтветитьOn wide- body A/C Boeing is clearly ahead
ОтветитьThe biggest difference: The A350 is on the market.
ОтветитьYeah I've already known the conclusion when I heard the accent in this video
ОтветитьA350 is actually flying ....
ОтветитьWhos watching this in 2024
ОтветитьThe A350-900 or A350-1000. All Day. Every Day.
ОтветитьOK since Airbus does seem to be more fuel efficient the thing I think would make a difference is pick a destination like LA to Tokyo with both planes full add the average cost on the flight times the seat capacity. Then calculate the fuel burn for the flight. Minus that figure from the revenue then minus the crew salary and see which one comes on top. Now I know there are more factors involved like meals etc... can anyone come up with the two figures and let me know. I'm just too lazy to do the math.
ОтветитьI didn’t know the test pilots flight in that protective gear! Hopefully they can eject is something wrong happens! Only time will tell which is better!
ОтветитьBoeing 777 is the best!
ОтветитьIn terms of long range and versatility, The A350 is the best. In terms of capacity and compactability, The 777x is the best.
ОтветитьAirbus all the way
ОтветитьGE9X isn't the most efficient engine in the world.
ОтветитьI have yet to fly on the A350. I mainly fly American, Delta, and United....
ОтветитьAn A350-1100 or whatever it is called would marginalise the 777x, simply the A350 is far, far lighter. What is needed is an engine to make this possible. In 5 years the RR innovations should make it worthwhile to introduce a neo across the range but in particular a larger stretched version. Not sure whether the wing on the A350 can be extended with the patented downward folding wingtips, if it is economically feasible then an aspect ratio of 10+ should be within the grasp of Airbus. Those two improvements would drag the A350 into an unassailable position from an efficiency perspective. It would be nigh on impossible for the B777x in its current to compete, its heavy fuselage handicaps it too much.
ОтветитьEmirates: Boeing 777X
Singapore Airlines: Airbus A350
Lufthansa: A350
Qatar: Both
That's what I would prefer more for Each Airline.
Only A350😃
ОтветитьCant handle the loud ass flaps on Airbus airplanes. They need to fix that and I'm a fan
ОтветитьBoeing 777X is the clear winner 🎉🎉
ОтветитьThe A350 wins it for me but the 777 looks better
ОтветитьThe 777x could be Boeing's last chance to save themselves.
Ответить777x
ОтветитьWhen comparing two - the word is "better".
ОтветитьWhen do airplane delivery schedules ever change for the better? Go shovel it somewhere else. I'm not buying it here.
ОтветитьStay safe fly Airbus😆👍
ОтветитьA350 XWB
Ответить777x is better than a350 in anything but it loses in range and cruise speed
ОтветитьBoeing vs europoor plane
Ответить777x is the clear winner
ОтветитьSo far only one of them is flying 🤣 so ... hard to say ?
ОтветитьAirbus is the winner especially when it comes to safety. Boeing used to make great planes but they have made too many mistakes in the recent past, it’s unacceptable.
ОтветитьInitially imagine 777x but reality is A350
ОтветитьThe only bad thing about the a350 is that a had so many flights with hard landings because the a350s gear are out of the basement
ОтветитьTriple 7 for me,bigger & more powerful is better but both very good.
ОтветитьThe original 777 was just great. I am European, so of cause I lean towards Airbus. What I wonder most is, that the 777X although quite a bit newer does not offer too much advantage on paper over the now "older" A350; or am I missing something?
ОтветитьThe A350 it is my favorite aircraft...
ОтветитьStrange comparison.
ОтветитьOne thing nobody has talked about is why the 777-9 is heavier per seat than the A350-1000. Yes, it's because it has an aluminum fuselage -- traditional aluminum too, not even aluminum lithium. But why? It's not like Boeing doesn't know how to do carbon or AlLi structures. Because Boeing wanted an aircraft that is both bigger and CHEAPER to build than the A350. That cheaper part is important because list prices are bullshit and the flexibility to either make great margins or out discount Airbus in a bid often decides who gets the order.
ОтветитьI ❤ Boeing !
Boeing should have also gone for designing an aircraft as a replacement of 757, having single aisle, regional range aircraft with contemporary look instead of sticking to various models of max as it has atleast the same 56 yrs old outlook _ may like that 787.
Lhe
B777 better
ОтветитьAnything is better than a 737 max , the 777x is out of the same stable as the 737 max , and Boeing are responsible for covering up the 737's fatal flaws , .......you decide , which one would you put your children / mother / father /family on , ....seriously....do not trust Boeing, they do not deserve your trust , ask the families of previous passengers ,
ОтветитьWhat I liked most about the Airbus A350 XWB is in fact the tail and fuselage cameras, which is perfect for me to use during takeoff, landing, and even if my window shade is closed.
ОтветитьA350 is a better aircraft. I loved flying in it! A350-900 is out selling the -1000 by a wide margin. Larger capacity without much better efficiency of 777-9 will hinder its sales. More likely to fill a smaller and make money instead of flying a larger plane that is not full.
Ответить