EXAMINING THE DELUSION OF "NO GOD" ATHEISM #1: LOGICAL FALLACIES IN THE ATHEIST'S ARGUMENTS

thank God real wisdom is ageless and stays true not matter what year you hear it.

@imnotthisoldlol Of course atheists worship their idols whether it be sports, movie stars, lust, money, pride, etc. I like the way you said "when an atheist BELIEVES" & "his [the atheist's] ASSUMPTION ...the BELIEF that the evidence ..." Out of your own mouth you prove the proposition that atheists are RELIGIOUS with your "beliefs" & "assumptions" about God & His existence. Why should we believe an atheist's brain (evolved from monkeys according to them) actually puts them in touch with reality?

@Onetruthrgv We'll have to disagree on this one. Atheism actually requires more religious faith than a natural faith or belief in God (Romans 1:18-32). I find it interesting that athesits themselves are obsessed with God & religiously strive to disprove the existence of God with fervor. If God really & truly doesn't exist then why are they so concerned about Him? There's a religious pattern among atheists as they try to justify their ungodly lives. Their religious high priests: Darwin & Dawkins.

@Shaobaal Your argument would hold water if you didn't mix adjectives with nouns. In grammar, an adjective is a word whose main syntactic role is to qualify a noun or noun phrase, giving more information about the object signified. While we use atheism as a noun you prefer to use it as an adjective, get it? What is religion? It depends on how you define it. Religion (noun) "body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices." You just don't like our use of the noun, get it?

@imnotthisoldlol Your comment is a religious statement in support of your atheistic religion. You religiously believe (by faith & "assumption") that the "evolving" took place over "3.4 billion years" (although many evolutionists "believe" religiously that the universe is over 15 billion years old & that God or some intelligent creator could not have done it). You "assume" (by faith) that there "has not been sufficient evidence to support his existence" even though you've not studied everything.

@TaylorThaHick If we did not agree with the points in this video we would not have posted this video, logical, huh? I'm very busy & have to keep up with comments coming in on our 287 videos currently posted on all kinds of subjects. Time is of the essence (Ephesians 5:16) & wasting a lot of time with unbelieving heretics & reprobates (Romans 1:22-32, Titus 3:10) is not fruitful. Our videos do most of the talking. "Chatting" back & forth forever is not something I plan to do (again Titus 3:10).

@Onetruthrgv There are a couple of new books out that deal with atheism in case you're interested. One is entitled, "Is God Just a Human Invention? & Seventeen Other Questions Raised by the New Atheists" written by Sean McDowell & Jonathan Morrow, published by Kregel Publications, 304 pages; (just got my free review copy last month). Another is an English publication out of London @ 2009 entitled, "10 Arguments That Don't Hold Water? - The "New" Atheism" by Michael Poole, Lion books. Psalm 9:17.

@SiriusMined The "tie that binds" atheists together despite your claim that they don't "have a specific system of belief or code of ethics" is their denial that God exists, get it? Their "specific system of BELIEF" is - GOD IS NOT THERE. That's what an atheist is. The atheist does not BELIEVE there is a God or gods at all, especially the God of the Bible so their "code of ethics" may vary on how evil they may want to become (whether to murder, rape, steal etc.) but God is NOT in their equation.

@SiriusMined Ah, this is a fun one to respond to. You've only proved the proposition of this video (the title of which is "Logical Fallacies in the Atheist's Arguments") in your illogical comment here (except for the part where you say I'm right). You've committed the classic logical fallacy of "THE STRAWMAN" by putting words in my mouth as if I had agreed with you in the first place about "code of ethics." I never said they all have the same "code of ethics," get it? That's what YOU said, see?

@ikvsabre You're making an illogical assertion. The logical fallacies you're committing are called BEGGING THE QUESTION (making an assertion that hasn't been proven, "different code of ethics...cannot share a religion") , EQUIVOCATION (inserting a different definition for the word "religion" than I have used), AD HOMINEM (saying I "cannot be honest") & GENETIC FALLACY ("fellow believers"). You stand CORRECTED. Atheists have a religious faith that God is NOT REAL, forget the "codes," get it?

@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You've given us two different belief systems while trying to merge them into an "atheism" definition which is a LOGICAL FALLACY called EQUIVOCATION. Atheism is the ABSOLUTE disbelief in God & His EXISTENCE. An atheist is a person who doesn't believe in any kind of SUPREME BEING. Agnostics, on the other hand, are neither believers or non believers. This group has doubts over the existence of God. They can't for sure say that they believe or disbelieve in the existence of God.

@ZelphKinderhook It's totally logical since a belief doesn't need to be stated in traditional terms to fall within First Amendment protection. The Supreme Court has deliberately avoided establishing an exact or a narrow definition of religion because freedom of religion is a dynamic guarantee that was written in a manner to ensure flexibility and responsiveness to the passage of time and the development of the United States. Thus, religion is not limited to traditional denominations, get it?

@ZelphKinderhook This "stupid" comment wasn't meant to reflect on the IQ quotient of atheists (many are very smart) but on the "common sense" quotient of atheists in relation to seeing this sophisticated & complex universe around them & concluding there is no possibility of a higher intelligence in the universe that could have created everything we see. The Bible describes atheists as "fools" (Psalm 14:1) & the definition of a fool is "One who is deficient in judgment, sense, & understanding."

@ZelphKinderhook Once again you're totally wrong. Take the American Atheist Center here in Austin, Texas. They receive charitable contributions from tax payers who receive tax write-offs for their donations from the Federal Government just like any church does. In fact if you check the organizations eligible to receive contributions from tax payers through the "Combined Federal Campaign" (check it out on the internet) there the atheists are. They're promoting their philosophy of "religion".

@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I'm wondering if you even bothered to watch the 1 hour video presentation before making this comment? If you'd have bothered to watch the video the speakers would've explained why they're calling atheism a "religion", get it? Despite this, you still try to define "religion" as something that doesn't encompass the concept of "don't believe in God." Your definition is not the same as our definition. Religion is a "faith system of beliefs" which is what Atheists have, get it?

@steadwik Your definition of atheism isn't the same as our defined definition. If you had bothered to watch the video you'd know that, get it? Is your definition of atheism the same as Madalyn O'Hair's? Is your definition the same as Webster's Dictionary? Your definition of atheism is a REDEFINITION attempting to merge AGNOSTICISM & atheism into one which doesn't work (logical fallacy of EQUIVOCATION). Your argument isn't worth bad spaghetti since an atheist is "deficient in understanding" God.

@steadwik Your committing the logical fallacy of BEGGING THE QUESTION when you say "i do not merge agnosticism & atheism". What is AGNOSTICISM to you? What is your definition of it? How does AGNOSTICISM differ from ATHEISM to you? You didn't answer my questions & why not? Do you believe Madalyn Murray O'Hair's definition of atheism & do you believe she was a real atheist or was she an agnostic? Is it your practice to go to videos without watching them & just make comments underneath them? Well?

@steadwik The reason the video has 27 dislikes is because the main audience "supposedly" watching this video are atheists, get it? Christians, mostly, aren't going to watch it because they already know that atheism is "foolish" (Psalm 14:1). Atheists aren't going to like their beliefs about God being called a religion (which it is) & they're certainly not going to agree with the video. If you had watched the video you'd know who O'Hair is. You're not an atheist at all but rather an AGNOSTIC.

@DakkaKing The problem is atheists are now trying to take over the definition of AGNOSTICISM which is a different philosophical position than ATHEISM. The classic definition of atheism is "NO GOD" (that's what the word means) but atheists run to AGNOSTICISM (without knowledge whether God exists or not) thus "atheists" are really "agnostics" claiming to be atheists. Dawkins says "an atheist ... believes [has faith] that there is nothing beyond the physical world" meaning his religion says NO GOD.

@DakkaKing Lack of supporting evidence? There's so much evidence it's overwhelming, atheists just don't want to accept any of it. Any Biblical archaeologists is amazed when people try to claim there is no evidence what they use the Bible as a road map to find archaeological sites, and it is never wrong. They just found Solomon's Wall.

@shadapple Great comment! The real problem with atheists is spiritual, they just hate the God of the Bible & want absolutely nothing to do with Him. Thus actual "evidence" for Christianity means absolutely nothing to them. A great example of this is a new video we just uploaded called,"DEBATE: THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS - A REAL PERSON OR NONEXISTENT? WATER MARTIN VS. MADALYN O'HAIR." Facts & evidences mean nothing to O'Hair & she seems to pride herself in her own ignorance. Roman 1:18-32, Ps 14:1

@mrdarkevilme You prove that the Bible is true whether you only watch 5 minutes of the show or not (which is probably longer than most atheists are willing to listen to arguments for God). Hypocritically talking about "insults" proves nothing since "insults" are mainly what we get from atheists. Romans 3:10-18 perfectly describes atheists. This condition is caused by God turning atheists over to a "reprobate" mind (Rom 1:22-32) & "delusion" (2 Thess 2:9-12). If God "deludes" you, what can we do?

this is garbage, if u prove to me god exists i will logicaly have to accept it... i'm waiting

@BLUEGENE13 The only "garbage" that exists in this comment section are the deluded comments by God hating atheists. Your comment is a good example. You have plenty of evidence all around you in the known world & your own complicated body with a brain, nervous system, eyes, internal organs, etc to know that all of this just couldn't have happened by random chance & luck. Instead of admitting that a Creator might exist you just deny it out of hand & wait for death. Jesus said it, Luke 16: 28-31.

@CAnswersTV you don't know that, prove to me GOD exists not the things around me

@uberd00b Who said we were trying to convert atheists in this video series? This series is really for believers, not atheists. It just so happens that atheists continue to show up here & naturally make comments like you are but are unable to stomach the material of the series so they don't watch it or very little of it. Your comment is full of assumptions & logical fallacies (that's what atheists do). God gives atheists & other unbelievers over to a reprobate mind (Romans 1, 2 Thess 2:9-12).

@UnchainYourMind2 Wow! Whatever happened to free speech in America? If you don't like it just change the channel but that's not good enough for you, eh? I see people trash Christianity all of the time on television, radio, the movies, etc but that doesn't seem to bother you. You don't like the fact that people can speak negatively about atheism & therefore you want to "dismantle" & "legally put" us "down"? You'd have loved Joseph Stalin or Mao Tse Tung because they would've followed your advice.

@articfox10 It's doubtful that any atheist has totally watched this video to end (let alone the other videos in this series). Many have already admitted that they could only view a few minutes before turning it off. Other atheists admitted that they didn't watch any of it, they just wanted to make comments here in the comments section. This series is for theists anyway, not you atheists. This series reveals the nonsense atheists believe (the same thing we do with other religious cults). Ps 14:1

If there's no God, there's no truth; no truth, no logic; no logic, no science; no science, no knowledge; no knowledge, no beauty; no beauty, no morals; no morals, no society; no society, no humans. Atheism is in denial of all these things. Worst of all, atheism denies the existence of love; it's not love, it's lust. The only God atheism is willing to believe in is one that's a doormat for the atheist's worldly lusts. the atheist is all about me, Me, ME, MEEE!!! The atheist thinks he's God.

Haha, I love that, you caught a morally high-standing (!) atheist (!!?) hypocrite right in the act. Good work. :) Thank you. I think they truly are all politicians or jurists in the end.

Numbers 23:19 makes Psalm 14:1 read thusly: The fool hath said in his heart, There is no person who does not lie." (God is the Person who does not lie.) The fool's statement is therefore self-contradictory (untrue) whether or not he actually believes his statement. He is inadvertently calling himself a liar (as his statement implies), or believes himself a liar by spouting a falsehood. Either way, his utterance is nonsensical as the Bible graciously declares instead of calling him a liar..

You've made several very accurate comments here in this comments section. Good stuff!

Good video and comments. The preaching of the cross is foolishness to those who don't believe, but to those who do believe it is the way of salvation. The foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men. Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe.

Unfortunately the high pitch tone made it impossible to watch.