Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@prbmax
@prbmax - 25.04.2023 22:12

Could Mills be right and it's hydrinos.

Ответить
@thatomofolo452
@thatomofolo452 - 25.04.2023 22:13

Nice one 👍👍☺️

Ответить
@ArtisanTony
@ArtisanTony - 26.04.2023 01:01

but I thought dark matter did not interact with light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation?

Ответить
@backonyeon
@backonyeon - 26.04.2023 06:25

Why would they be ultra massive (high Kg) or ultra light (low #)?
I've been told for years that the two are (1) "different ", (2) not linear referencial and, (3) I'm dumb if I can't understand that without the argument having to reference to as a direct method of separation....oh good...were tracking if that sounds like absolute BS.
Now you use them in direct opposition. Almost as if they are interrelated (if not interreferential) terms.
Please explain what you are saying in this video to a self proclaimed dummy.
Start by explaining weight vs mass without self reference. ?
Whatever.

Ответить
@shawns0762
@shawns0762 - 26.04.2023 18:51

Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "the essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. This is illustrated in a common 2 axis relativity graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason.
Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy.
According to Einstein's math, the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the missing mass is dilated mass.
According to Einstein's math, galaxies with very, very low mass would show no signs of dark matter because they do not have enough mass at the center to achieve relativistic velocities, therefore they are not infused with dilated mass. This has recently been confirmed with 5 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4.
The shape of a galaxy is common in nature. From atoms to our solar system, the overwhelming majority of the mass is in the center. The same must be true for galaxies. Where there is mass there is energy. The night sky should be lit up from the galactic center but it isn't.
The modern explanation for this is because gravitational forces there are so strong that not even light can escape. Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is dilated relative to an Earthbound observer.
The reason why we cannot see light from the galactic center is because there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid.

Ответить
@jamestanny849
@jamestanny849 - 29.04.2023 22:14

In regard to the issue relating to the actual brightness of the galaxies, does this imply that Wien's displacement law could possibly be inaccurate?

Ответить
@RobertParish-yz5pz
@RobertParish-yz5pz - 30.05.2023 22:17

Dark matter is just dust. The universe is full of dust.

Ответить
@thekid5353
@thekid5353 - 31.05.2023 02:32

It should be avalanche caused by radioactive material that decomposes the phenomenon in which the intensity differs from the colossal to radioactive material itself from point A to point B

Ответить
@photografr7
@photografr7 - 31.05.2023 22:42

Please post a paper on this topic.

Ответить
@shibashishdas7982
@shibashishdas7982 - 27.03.2024 21:59

Could it be that the Universe just is someone's prototype that didn't work!!

Ответить