Комментарии:
Your videos don't make any sense. One video you will say the s400 has proven to be a disappointment and clearly not able to do what it says. Then the next video it is the best in the world... make up your mind
ОтветитьI don't see the UK and France leaders saying no to the idea because those 2 are also just so happen to be in best support for Ukraine as well. If Germany really do believe that the EU is next if Ukraine falls, Germany should give up all there current share to Ukraine just to be battle tested in a real war.
ОтветитьYou are crazy! Stop the war!
ОтветитьLol. Will never happen.
ОтветитьThe only reason the Taurus won’t be used just yet is, because NATO are still preparing for all out war with Russia, so the bridge as well as many other Russia targets are being strategically factored into Battle Plans. The UK and Europe need to be thinking about what this war is going to mean to them and their families, depending on where in the world they reside, and concentrate on that.
ОтветитьUkraine get Crimea back 😂😂😂😂 hilarious!
ОтветитьDo not underestimate the engineers in Ukraine ...
ОтветитьThe citizens of Crimea voted to be under russian control and not Corrupt Ukraine. Zelensky/Ukraine will never get Crimea back and have lost 30% of their land, because they were murdering their own citizens before Putin stopped the Ukraine military. The Bridges in crimea are not even being used..
ОтветитьEven in your own pictures the bridge is empty no traffic..Your liars!
ОтветитьUkraine has showed that they are very good at using air drones and decoy drones to get cruise missiles into the real target. Taurus flying at 30 meters above the sea to only pop up at the last moment would have a very good chance to destroy the bridge. That will get a lot of Russians fleeing crimea and upset Putin. Ukraine should send a SU25 to taurus to get started on the modifications and get the pilots trained on usage. Ukraines learn fast.
ОтветитьIt comes across that Germany is not so interested in Ukraine driving Russia out completely.
Ответить3g
ОтветитьDoes it have the accuracy to take out a bridge pillar? If not then it's just another bunker buster.
Ответитьthat bridge has to go; Its a valuable asset to Russia to defend both Crimea and Southern Ukraine. Secondly has a dash to Putins pride as this could cause him to give up. Thirdly to demonstrate that in future Ukraine wants no connections with Russia. Its not just the Bridge arches that are vulnerable, there is plenty else to destroy inclurail the road and rail inferstructure either end of it. The Ferry terminals also need negating.
ОтветитьUkraine have more than proved the are very well capable of modifications to existing weapons to achieve the desired outcome. Germany are allocating huge financial support to Ukraine. I find it hard to understand why they wouldn't supply tool that could possibly help end this war much quicker and save themselves possibly millions if not billions of dollars and save so many lives. Give them what they need...Ukraine have already proved they are more than capable of delivery!!!
ОтветитьI don't remember seeing Ukraine make any drone submarines if Ukraine can build some drone submarines, that can use the same, means of creating energy by ocean currents, and solar, if you had about 20 of those, since they're very good at making cedars it would need to be as big as one of the McGraw drone boats, put a submarine, that thing would need help from in particular Sweden, there's subs some of the hardest in the world to detect, but you'd have to put a device to totally destroy this submarine drawing if you lose control of it because Russia got their hands on this, they figure out a way how to make them and give the technology to China and North Korea, just as I think that they have some of the sea baby drones and given them to North Korea and China to have them come up with something for them.
ОтветитьReally enjoy your insightful commentaries. Thank-you. But at the same time, I am sure at times, you must reflect how sad it is that the abilities of mankind are directed to the horrors of war.
ОтветитьI think the Kerch Bridge is where a ceasefire starts, and peace begins. When UK decides to show they can destroy the bridge, a ceasefire will occur. Along with leaving it intact will show UK is still will to accommodate to interaction with Russia.
ОтветитьThe bridge ties up significant Russian resources that will move to front lines when no longer needed. In addition the road box spans are easily replaced and the rail spans are very heavily built.
ОтветитьInterest. MEPHESTO was a German tank captured by Australian troops and was on display for many years outside the Queensland Museum in Australia before being requisitioned by The Australian National War Museum
ОтветитьWas it this channel that ran the story of Turkey having bought an S-400 system from Russia? They tested it out and found that it pretty much could only hit its targets if they cam in on at high altitude, didn't evade, and were flying over flat terrain on a clear sunny day. In other words, the system was over hyped. Turkey (I think) decided against buying more of them.
ОтветитьMost of the residents of Crimea want to go back to being Ukraine.
ОтветитьHello, I try really hard to like your show but there is to much repeating things already said and just a little new information. Then filled with stuff you talked about 2 to three weeks ago, many time contradicting what was said before. I will watch to see if things change in the next few shows.
ОтветитьIf the Taurus flies at 30m then the S400 cannot be employed.😊
ОтветитьDonald we love you . And this world is a disaster . I wonder if somewhere some rich man with enough money would be willing to buy a number of FPV-drones , say in Russia , and send them to Trump , Vance and Musk as a gift and recognition for their excellent work worldwide ? A big thank you for a job well done ?‼️
ОтветитьIsn't the Indian government selling the Brahma series of missiles? Make up for aircraft joint development billions lost from Russia?
ОтветитьHow did you look yourself in the mirror reporting this absolute BULLSHIT nonsense 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьDreamers
ОтветитьUkraine has the perfect weapon to strike it? The Taurus cruise drone?
Since when?
I suspect that Merz made the decision NOT to disclose specific aid to Ukraine because he will give Taurus to Ukraine, and doesn’t want to give putin the advance knowledge. I think that not announcing these aid packages is a good idea.
ОтветитьGermany needs to stay out of everything...
Why in the hell did the world let them have any form of weapons?
That bridge should have been gone from the beginning.
ОтветитьPutin is known to be a criminal defendant wanted by the International Criminal Court on charges of child abduction, and will likely also be indicted for three years of attacks on civilians that caused massive casualties.
ОтветитьIt is exactly the time
Ответить😂😂lol
ОтветитьDon't poke the bear.
ОтветитьUkraine can't get back Crimea.
ОтветитьHow many feet in 30 meters?
ОтветитьHow exactly does this plan propose Germany gets involved or aid Ukraine regarding Crimea, legislatively or militarily?
ОтветитьRussians have limited resources and don't tend to defend places that they think are safe (like the sea of Azov). If Ukraine could get a Taurus missile to the Azov sea, I suspect that it would be clear sailing all the way to the Crimean Bridge.
ОтветитьBullshit that's why they don't send it.
ОтветитьThat bridge has got to go.
ОтветитьCome on @TheMilitaryShow get your facts straight!
The Taurus KEPD-350 is not solely German — it's a joint German-Swedish development between MBDA Deutschland and Saab Bofors Dynamics. Mislabeling it as only German dismisses Sweden’s key contribution to its design and production.
Also, the Moskva wasn’t sunk by unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). It was struck by two Ukrainian R-360 Neptune anti-ship cruise missiles launched from land. The USVs are a newer threat that came later and have been highly effective against Russia’s Black Sea Fleet — no doubt about that — but mixing up the timeline or attribution just spreads confusion.
Give credit where it’s due, and check the facts before publishing.
It's surprising Taurus integration with NATO F-16s and Mirages weren't already made. Alternatively, send Gripens, already Taurus ready, but longer time to deploy due to pilot training and experience accumulation. The best bet is this using Fencers (should have already been secretly upgraded) covered by Mirages, and F-16 doing SEAD by HARM (capability not yet known, but should already have been trained); all after extensive SEAD by drones and other missiles being the tell. And Crimea is Ukraine, so Taurus is only being used within Ukraine. 🤣
ОтветитьBullshit😂😂😂😂😂
ОтветитьSound's like this is a solution
ОтветитьSólo en vuestras fantasías enfermizas podéis derrotar a Rusia que no en el plano real.
ОтветитьThis will nevr be happen.
ОтветитьDo the crimean people get a say in any of this? Lol
ОтветитьMy question is, and has been for a long time; How come that bridge is still standing?
If all else fails (or is off the board ... ) can't they persuade the Yanks to send Rambo to swim out to it in the dead of night with a bomb in his teeth, and erase it? Or if Rambo is now pensioned off, then any three US marines can do it before breakfast and not raise a sweat. Sheesh ... and they call ME dumb!