Комментарии:
Unfortunately pete couldnt win french open 🤔
ОтветитьBut still he played well on clay courts !!!
ОтветитьA packed stadium for a 2nd round is impressive...people probably knew Pete could go out at any point at RG.
ОтветитьSampras, quel beau champion!
ОтветитьSampras's best run at the French open by far. Beating the likes of Courier and Bruguera on clay in other years might have given him the title, but it left him exhausted. I'm not sure many people expected him to beat Bruguera here on clay - Bruguera also being one of the players who had a winning head to head against him.
ОтветитьSampras style is not suitable for the slow court so he couldn't get the title at RG.
ОтветитьPete’s craziness on clay means he could never be in GOAT debate. He was too impatient and didn’t adapt his game. But nice to see he could occasionally pull off an upset.
ОтветитьSampras in 96 was virtually unbeatable. This is a moral victory for the grasscourt stud. The dirt was never in the cards for him.
ОтветитьSampras very impressive here on clay..Not winning RG that year only proves how difficult opposition was in those years and how great he was winning other slams!
ОтветитьThat back hand of samras was super weak on clay ... even i could beat him on that day
Ответить1st & 2nd set = 1 hour of pure Aussie 60's style from Sampras vs a double FO champion
So classic technic, 2 strokes max to finish the point, most of the time to the net or with his 100 % flat forehand, a true dream style of play
Pete had the most beautiful yet the most aggresive and attacking game ever.❤️❤️❤️
Ответитьit was a very dry dry year , that year in Paris, which favored petes attacking game , still, after 26 years, hard to believe he beat a 2 time champ there.
ОтветитьWhy didn't he play like this against Kafelnikov ?
ОтветитьPete has never won the french open, but he beat both Bruguera & Courier (double champion each) in 5 sets. In these conditions, dry & very sunny, he could beat anybody by serving and volleying this way. At his best, his game was a delight to watch. We would need more Pete on the 2022 ATP tour...
ОтветитьWhat a forehand
ОтветитьSampras was one of the most skilled, but poorly conditioned Champions in all of sport.
Ответитьhis volley was so beautiful! even on clay court
ОтветитьIf Pete Sampras would serve 1st Service close to 70% , he would give only 1 break point (worst case 2 break point) in the entire match.
Pete Sampras service was accurate in later part of set.
Prime Sampras would have stopped Federer, Djokovic & Nadal to less than 8 Grand slams like he did to Courier, Agassi, Becker etc.
I think Sampras was the best ever. Unfashionable, I know.
ОтветитьSamprass best player ever. So simlple and attac tennis. Serv and volley.
ОтветитьSampras best player to watch. Pure class. No bully, simply tennis. No screaming and acting.
ОтветитьHe could’ve won this tournament with a different racquet
ОтветитьThe fact that Pete Sampras - a serve-&-volley specialist who had a clay-court record of 90-54 (62.5%) and significantly his weakest surface - was abe to beat a two-time Roland Garros champion Brugeura in five sets (e.g. to eliminate the possibility that Bruguera had an off-day and lost in straight-sets) really shows you how good Sampras and how strong that era was.
Ответить10年以上前のラケットを使わずに最新の使えよ おそらく フレンチオープン 取れてる
ОтветитьSampras was a true gentleman on court. See his shorts here. He would not even bother the other player's momentum by taking a bathroom break. He just goes on court not worrying how it looked with his shorts and all.
ОтветитьPete sampras, asi como era invencible cuando realmente se lo proponia, de igual manera regalaba los partidos y no luchaba, cuando su mente se negaba, esa es la verdad, no es justificacion para sampras, lo que se ve no se juzga ni se niega
ОтветитьThe funny thing is that If Roger had Pete's serve, he probably doesn't become such a pigeon to Nadal. Federer had better ground game than Pete but he didn't have a serve ( his serve was still great) that could give him automatic free points.
ОтветитьPara mim foi uma delícia ver Pete Sampras jogar. Puro talento e classe. Juntamente com Stefan Edberg e Roger Federer, foram os jogadores mais talentosos e que melhor jogaram num court de tênis. É claro que depois vêem os resultadistas a dizer que o melhor é o que tem mais grand slams e isto e mais aquilo. Mas eu prefiro ver um grande jogador e que tenha classe pura a um que jogue com potência e físico. Hoje em dia os jogadores á parte de 2 ou 3 não têm jogo de rede e passam a vida a correr de um lado para o outro no court. Não há criatividade. Essa é que é a verdade. Jogam com o fisico e pouco mais.
ОтветитьPete had a great tournament but he arrived in the semifinals absolutely exhausted and against Kafelnikov he only lasted one set competitively. By the way, this was a great match between two of my favorite players with totally opposite styles.❤️
ОтветитьPete's best win on clay. against prime Bruguera (1993 - 1997 in Paris: Win, Win, Semifinal, lost to Pete in 2nd round, Final)
ОтветитьAwesome smile he has! As beautiful as his serve
ОтветитьDamn fine tennis Pete really had to play well to beat Bruguera on clay and man, these points are so fun to watch both players make so many good shots!
ОтветитьSampras serve and volley..
ОтветитьSampras playing in his pajamas
ОтветитьPete简直就是神
ОтветитьBetween 93 and 97 only one man beat Bruguera at RG before the semis, and that was Pete in this match.
ОтветитьQue Bruguera ganará tantos Rolando Garros me parece inconcebible. Le tocó una época débil, sin grandes rivales.
Ответить