Комментарии:
That's only 50 % true statement, what's she's not saying is the launch site from a submarine, aircraft, or outter space , those can not be detected until they reach around 50-60 thousand from the surface and from a orbiting satellite equipped with a nuclear weapons rocket 🚀 only within a range of 10- 20 minutes because of space debris surrounding our planet 🌏.
ОтветитьWow
ОтветитьWho cares. What about when a submarine sneaks into a US bay and launches a nuclear missile from our shoreline and the missile explodes as soon as it leaves the water. There is zero reason why what I just said could happen. 72 minutes? bull crap more like 1 second.
ОтветитьIt doesn't matter what she is talking about. If Annie is speaking, I'm either swiping to another video or any other option I may have just so I don't have to listen to her talk!
ОтветитьYeah right, show me one, just one f picture of a satellite in space!
ОтветитьConfirmed complete bullshit😂
ОтветитьIf she’s telling you about that tech, it’s already 20 years old and has been replaced by tech that is even better.
ОтветитьThat’s the scariest part of all they cannot be redirected or recalled. So wherever they are programmed to strike, they are going to strike or hopefully be destroyed before a strike.
ОтветитьIs it "sibrs" or "spit sibrs"? I am confused now.
ОтветитьYa ya ya. But let me ask this. What happens if china uses its space drones that can grab a American Satalight and push them off geostationary position. Our Satalight s do not have stabilization thrusters. chinese drones already there.
ОтветитьThe real question here is who is the enemy
ОтветитьPatiently waiting for everyone to hit the button
ОтветитьSO AI FAKES IT AND WE ALL DIE GREAT
ОтветитьIt's like the movie with will Smith Gene Hackensack that technology is unreal
Ответить