Комментарии:
i thought steven crowder supported states rights?
ОтветитьThere is one sure fire way to fix this, but I cannot mention it without getting banned.
ОтветитьMarines against United States citizens??? Doesn't the LAPD have experience roughing people up already?
ОтветитьOn a somewhat unrelated note, I heard about Chinese students getting caught by the FBI (I believe) trying to smuggle biological weapons into the US. I hope Steven talks about this so I can hear the fake Chinese accent again. “We are Chiney!” 😂
ОтветитьI'm sure that MS13 and the cartels are really angry about their drug and human traffic being shut down by ICE. These were big money makers for them.
ОтветитьDont forget the activist judges Crowder.
ОтветитьThey need to cut this out. They talk about masks law and trump taking over. Ummmm... you keep doing this, he'll be fully within his rights to do it. They are just providing the justification.
ОтветитьThose who are carrying a Mexican flag should be sent to Mexico. It doesn't matter what country they are from. If they care more for the Mexican flag than the American flag, Mexico is where they should be.
ОтветитьTheir newest strat now involves using children and toddlers as human shields. Genius, there is no line they won't cross for victimhood status.
ОтветитьThe true power for change is not with the flag burning, store looting, anti-police, anti-ICE or anarchists againts Constitutional Law, no, the true most powerful entity are the law-abiding, taxpaying legal citizens of Los Angeles and California in general. Once again, the law-abiding taxpayers of Los Angeles will feel the brunt of the riot's destruction for the many police vehicles burned down, the shattered windows and graffiti paint that has to be removed plus other destruction of city property; all from the lawless actions of rioters.They are the true most powerful who can change the unfair, the insipid regulations and the detrimental negative impact on their lives, businesses and wellbeing. Californians have the resiliency and strong unified ability with their vote, their vote, to right the wrongs they are faced with by the current California administration. Peace in Los Angeles and throughout their beautiful state of California can be realized again if they vote change for progress and not tradition.🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷
ОтветитьHALLELUJAH 🎉
ОтветитьThey’re lawless. They don’t care about the rule of law.
ОтветитьMy genuine question is who keeps bringing pallets of brick/ cinder blocks, mysteriously show up every riot. From bmore to la
ОтветитьRiot was preplanned when ICE arrived by governor and mayor Bass, truth will come out. Somebody should go to jail.
ОтветитьDemocrats are the party of lawlessness, international terrorists, domestic terrorists, criminal gangs, antisemites and open borders. Full stupidity of the democrats on display for all to see.
ОтветитьI keep saying this and not a single liberal can answer,where was this energy when Obama was deporting illegals?You know,the deporter in chief?Where was the protests and the riots?
ОтветитьIm sure the website Crowds On Demand business is up for the upcoming weekend and also Mobilze.
ОтветитьBass is a Veceremos Fidel Castro trained Communist Agitator 1970’s
CHIRLA funded by Front group PFL gets money from US AID and is laundered through Newsom Nancy Pelosi’s Nephews Office.
45 BILLION IN DEBT STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNDER NEWSOME DUE TO 85 MILLION A YEAR IN FREE HEALTH CARE FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS. 3000 DOLLARS A MONTH LIVING EXPENSES FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS.
Steven Crowder please help bring to light what is going on with Nuxanor and Tectone vs Piker and his friends please help them get info to out to on them please thank you for what you and parents and friends and worker do . Please help and look in to it.
ОтветитьBut who will pick the cotton (avocados)?
This sounds like the democrats won’t give up the cheap labor again.
All protestors should be deported along with the aliens.
ОтветитьSteven chowder have you learned nothing? 😠 your ex wife is right your nothing but an embarrassment husband!!! I’m calling you out right now !!!
ОтветитьWhy does that insane L.A. Mayor constantly smile when she’s talking about the city burning, both this intentional man made…I mean “they-them” made fire and the one when she ran off to Africa?
ОтветитьL.A. voted#1 for Riots.
ОтветитьAbsaloutly an insrection
ОтветитьHow is someone with Antifa never held accountable?
ОтветитьIf people can't go to work?
You mean like when Governor Newscum locked the state down and kept EVERYONE from going to work? Or to a park? Or to the beach?
That is authoritarian.
This is a President using the authority of the Powers vested in his office by the Constitution to uphold the LAW.
Illegal immigrants are not immigrants, the legal process of immigration must be adhered to. This absolute nonsense the democrats spew is tiresome and is running it's course.
ОтветитьSoros goons
ОтветитьSerfs is the word you're looking for Crowder.
ОтветитьDon't start using their language. Don't make this a thing.
You sound weak.
When the pendulum comes back, this tactic you want to use WILL backfire.
Someone gotta remind Shumer if an insurrection lasts more than 4 hours to see a doctor.
Ответить18 U.S. Code § 2383 addresses the crime of rebellion or insurrection against the U.S. government, stating that anyone who incites, assists, or participates in such an act is subject to penalties. While it doesn't explicitly define "insurrection," it describes actions that constitute this offense, such as inciting or engaging in rebellion.
ОтветитьMartin v. Mott (1827), a Supreme Court case, dealt with the President's authority to call forth the militia to suppress insurrections. The Court ruled that the decision of whether an exigency requiring the militia has arisen rests exclusively with the President, making his decision conclusive. This means that Martin v. Mott clarifies that the President has broad discretion to determine what constitutes an "insurrection" for the purpose of invoking the Insurrection Act, but it doesn't provide a specific legal definition of the term itself.
ОтветитьNobody lives Mexico more than people that refuse to live there
ОтветитьImagine the BS were in for when the dems inevitably take back power in a few years...wish I could afford to move to Russia
Ответитьi dont think they understand what Marines are for.....go home kids, those people arent trained to make arrests....DO NOT POKE THE FKING BEAR
ОтветитьIf you read the insurrection act again, you could easily make the case that sanctuary laws (city or state) are an insurrection
ОтветитьI say we split northern and southern california. It can become its own state that is part of USA, but doesn't receive anymore federal funding. Americans are sick of paying them everything. Yeah you can argue they have massive GDP because of the microelectronic companies there. But that is the only reason is because of the monopoly big tech created in cali. It is nearly impossible to start a microelectronic business unless you have billions in backing. Intel is a major reason we don't have many in USA because they manipulated the system buying up smaller tech asap to prevent other growth. Look at their BS now.
ОтветитьFor the leftists and Democrats in California to say, to claim that the riots in Los Angeles and the riots that are spreading throughout the United States, is all Trump's fault and doing is very misleading and it doesn't expose the real truth. I mean, who's the Governor of California? Hmm? Who's the mayor of LA? Trump? No. Trump's not the Governor of California nor is he the mayor of Los Angeles. Gavin Newsom is the Governor of California. And he, he is the one who is letting these riots in Los Angeles happen. It's on him, not on Trump. Trump doesn't run California. Newsom does. This is all on him. And that Bass lady, she's the mayor of Los Angeles. She's the one who runs that city. Not Trump. She runs the city because she is the mayor. She is supposed to govern the entire city and is supposed to prevent riots, which are different from protests, from happening. The riots in Los Angeles are totally on Bass. She failed to stop them from happening. She could've prevented the riots from happening, but didn't. And Newsom, as the guy who runs and governs the entire state of California, could've prevented the riots from happening as well, but didn't. This is all on Newsom and Bass. This is they're fault. And everyone knows it. It's they're fault that now these riots are spreading across the country now, literally. Alex Jones actually said this was going to happen. And it's happening. And for what? Because their mad at Trump because he is actually doing the job regarding the border that the United States has literally been doing for decades and decades and decades and decades since literally almost the beginning of the country and that is actually detaining violent illegals who commit atrocious acts on innocent Americans and actually deporting illegals including violent ones back to where they came from? That's what their mad at? It's our job to deport people who aren't supposed to be in this country back to where they came from if they have the proper legal documents to even be here. That's our job. It's been our job literally since almost the beginning of the United States. The Constitution of the United States of America states that the United States must deport and detain illegals including violent ones back to where they came from in order to secure the border or borders and to ensure the safety of the American people from being harmed or killed by illegal immigrants, especially those violent ones, who attempt to enter into this country. The Constitution of the United States literally tells us to do that. Trump is only following the Constitution of the United States, like an actual American President is supposed to do. And yet, you leftists are upset about that? So much so that you want to burn down buildings and cars and houses and businesses and harm or worse, kill innocent people, just because you are upset that an actual American President is actually doing the job of actually deporting illegals back to where they came from and actually detaining violent illegals who commit atrocious acts on innocent Americans like this country has literally been doing on and off since literally almost the beginning of the United States and that literally almost every single President and political figure of all political parties have said that one of the major priorities for the United States and the American people is to secure the border to prevent the invasion of millions of illegals including violent ones and to ensure the safety of the American people so that they wouldn't be harmed and or killed by the millions of illegals including or especially the more violent ones, who attempt to enter into the United States? Literally almost every single President since the beginning of the United States, including Obama, Trump, Clinton, etc and literally almost every single political figure including Hillary Clinton, etc, since literally almost the beginning of the United States, have all said, some of whom who unfortunately didn't fall through with they're promises(Obama and Biden being two of them who didn't do that), but they've all said, word for word, that one of the biggest priorities of the United States and the American people is to secure the border or borders to ensure the safety of the American people and to ensure that no American, of any background, race, color, political affiliation or religious affiliation, should be harmed or killed by the millions of illegals, but especially the more violent ones, who come or attempt to enter into this country and that we must deport any illegal citizen who doesn't have the legal documents to even be here in the United States of America and that we must detain any violent illegal citizens who choose to do harm on innocent Americans in the United States. Literally almost every single President and political figure since literally almost the beginning of the United States have all said that. And yet, the leftists and Democrats in this country want to be upset about that, so much so that they will literally start riots, including burning down buildings, vehicles, assault people, etc, just because they are upset about that. And this unfortunately happens elsewhere across the globe. Leftists creating riots because they're upset because of common sense minded policies or views. And this is exactly why the approval rating of the Democrats nationwide are at historic lows and why the trust in them and the mainstream media platforms like MSNBC and the other ones are at historic lows, in the United States and globally. This is exactly why the leftists and Democrats are failing nationwide and globally. So much so that now, they're reverting to doing this. Sad and a real shame too.
ОтветитьDestiny is NOT a good debater, my guy.
ОтветитьThank god Jesus is white or we’d have to deport him
ОтветитьThe claim that the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol was an insurrection is supported by various lines of evidence, including legal definitions, documented events, and judicial findings.
Legal Definition of Insurrection
U.S. federal law (18 U.S. Code § 2383) addresses "Rebellion or Insurrection." While the term "insurrection" isn't explicitly defined, courts and legal scholars generally interpret it as a violent uprising or organized resistance against the government or its regulations, often involving acts intended to overthrow, disrupt, or challenge the authority of the United States or impede the enforcement of federal laws.
Evidence from the January 6th Attack:
* Intent to Overturn Election Results: The primary goal of many participants, incited by then-President Trump's false claims of a stolen election, was to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power and prevent the certification of the 2020 presidential election results by Congress. This intent to obstruct a constitutional process is a core element of an insurrection.
* Violence and Force: The attack involved significant violence against law enforcement officers, breaches of the Capitol building, vandalism, and property damage. Rioters used various weapons, including flagpoles, a crutch, and a hockey stick, and some were armed with firearms, knives, and other dangerous objects.
* Targeting Government Authority: The mob directly targeted the seat of the U.S. government while lawmakers were in session. They sought out members of Congress and Vice President Mike Pence, with disturbing intentions towards them for their role in certifying the election.
* Organized and Planned Aspects: While some aspects may have appeared spontaneous, investigations have revealed significant planning and coordination among certain groups, such as the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, who aimed to obstruct the electoral count. Discussions about a violent overthrow were openly circulating among Trump supporters for weeks prior to the event.
* Charges and Convictions:
* Seditious Conspiracy: A number of individuals, including leaders of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, have been charged and convicted of seditious conspiracy (18 U.S. Code § 2384), which involves conspiring to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the United States, or to oppose by force the authority thereof. These convictions are strong legal affirmations of an insurrectionary intent.
* Obstruction of an Official Proceeding: Many participants have been convicted of obstructing an official proceeding (the certification of electoral votes), highlighting their intent to interfere with a core government function.
* Assaults on Law Enforcement: Hundreds of individuals have been charged with and convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers, demonstrating the violent nature of the attack.
* Trespassing and Disorderly Conduct: While seemingly lesser charges, the sheer volume of these charges against individuals who unlawfully entered and disrupted the Capitol further illustrates the widespread disregard for legal authority.
* Congressional Investigations: The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol conducted an extensive investigation, presenting testimony, documents, and video evidence that detailed the events and concluded that the attack was part of a broader effort to overturn the election.
* Statements and Rhetoric: Then-President Trump's rhetoric leading up to and during the event, including his repeated false claims of election fraud and his urging the crowd to "fight like hell" and march to the Capitol, has been cited as a significant factor in inciting the crowd.
In summary, the sheer scale of the violence, the explicit goal of disrupting a constitutional process, the targeting of government officials and property, and the subsequent legal charges and convictions, particularly for seditious conspiracy, provide substantial evidence to support the characterization of the January 6th attack as an insurrection.
I mean it's essentially the Democrats encouraging and promoting the riots and violence praising them and telling them not to stop the same s*** they were never held accountable for the last time. Our city and our state will defend you is just telling them to continue rioting breaking the law and trying to hurt people.
ОтветитьI'm retired at 47, This video here reminds me of my transformation from a nobody to having over 65,000 biweekly profit, a honest partner and a good daughter full of love ❤
ОтветитьI like this video, thank you, like like like
ОтветитьJAN 6th JAN 6th JAN 6th JAN 6th
Ответить