Комментарии:
👏🙏🙇♂
ОтветитьWas Saint Germain a an avatar
ОтветитьHe is wrong. Not all avatars are born in India
ОтветитьGreat! Thanks! Yes all Avatars are born in India, a land of great and constantly flowing and flourishing spirituality where Hundred-thousands of sages, seers enlightened masters, divine beings, Buddhas, great saints are born in India and more and more keep coming.
These sages, saints, Buddhas, messiahas are not Avatars, they're the ones who themselves identify and worship & tell the world of who are the Avatars (Rama, Krishna two of the complete Avatars)
This is due to the sheer magnitude & volume of spirituality that still exists here (despite 1000 years of Islamic & Christian oppression, brutalities and attempted destruction of India and its spiritual culture)!
With more and more Indians adopting westernism, many Indians have also got into material pursuits and life of sensual gratification as the primary thing. Due to which spiritual culture has reduced in many places in India (especially urban centres), however, its still too rich and flows incessantly.
OM SHRI SAI RAM
ОтветитьMahadev 🙏🙏
ОтветитьOne thing is interesting. Imram says that we are not in Kali yuga, and Sai Baba and Haidakhan Babaji, whom he mentions so much in his videos, said that we are in Kaliyuga. It would be good if he clarified things. I don't think Sai Baba would say things that are not true.
ОтветитьHere’s the thing sir. For most parts you’re right. For some you’re wrong.
Krishna or Ram are Purn avatars and not merely avatars of Vishnu. Vishnu is just an aspect of the all encompassing intelligence- the Brahm. Just as Shiva and Bramha are. Most people end up confusing Brahm for Vishnu. BTW Brahma and Bramha are different. One is supreme while the other is just an aspect of it. In the Gita, Krishna clearly shows his true form to Arjun, which is all encompassing. Please read it again for clarity. Similarly, Ram Chandra, when he interacts with munis like Bharadwaj and Atri while in Vanvas, he clearly accepts himself as the poorn Brahm.
Since they are both doing leela, in human form, they both respect everyone worthy of respect, including his gurus like vishvamitra, vashista and rishish like kunbhaj, atri, yagyavalik, bharadwaj and many more. That doesn’t mean he was inferior to them. This was just the modesty expected from a role model human. Ram worshiping lord shiva doesn’t make him inferior. As about Bramha, Vishnu, Mahesh, Jagdamba they are just the manifestation of the Brahma.
Hence the Mahamantra is not just recitation of lord Vishnu. It’s the recitation of the name of the all encompassing intelligence.
Clearly, you’ve not read the shastras.
Now, you need to understand the Upasana methods. There’s is nirgun- without form and shagun- in whatever form the bhakt wants to see the brahm. Shagun Upasana is similar to freezing the formless water into a shape. Water and ice are essentially same.
So if somebody calls for brahm in form of Shiva, beleiving that shiva is the param brahm, the intelligence takes that form for the devotee. And the form is not restricted. If one can devote oneself truly and believe that you as in you, are actually brahm, the brahm will manifest itself as you for the person, even if (just for the sake of example) you might be the worst person in the universe. Ramcharitmanas by Tulsidas clearly explains this phenomenon.
Hari is not Vishnu again, by the way.
As about Saibaba, most sanatan dharmavlambi reject him. His documented history doesn’t record him as a good human being , let alone a saint. This doesn’t mean one cannot believe Sai baba to be the form of some great entity. If one actually does, and puts faith in him, Sai baba would actually grant him everything he needs/wants, including knowledge, wisdom, happiness, guidance. प्रधानता तत्व की है।
Anybody believing Shiva to the supreme entity or Vishu to be it or Durga to be it or Jesus to be it, will all eventually end up at the same destination, that is moksha. Might not be this life. But the collected efforts of multiple lives.
Edit: Forgot to tell that the mahamantra was not given by Srila Prabhupad. The mantra had existed way long before him. Chaitanya mahaprabhu used to sing the same mantra as well. Prabhupad merely popularised it in the west. Disseminating of misinformation is dangerous. Watch out.
Hara Hara Mahadeva..❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Ответить